Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06672289

Comparison of the Analgesic Effectiveness of Pericapsular Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliac Block Application

Observational Hip Surgery

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Hip Surgery. Basic parameters: 18 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of the Analgesic Effectiveness of Pericapsular Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliac Block Application in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy

Overview

Suprainguinal Fascia iliac compartment outlet and Pericapsular nerve reduction, which is a routinely successful method for postoperative analgesia in anesthesia practice; the aim is to investigate information regarding postoperative pain level, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction and discharge time after arm arthroscopy.

Detailed description

Patients will be monitored with routine monitoring under operating room conditions. After the patient's baseline VAS score and vital signs are recorded, patients will be intubated after induction of general anesthesia. After the site is cleaned, a pericapsular nerve block (PENG) or suprainguinal fascia iliac block (SFIB) will be performed under USG guidance. After the procedure, the patient will be transferred to the surgical team for positioning. Blood pressure and pulse values will be recorded after the procedure and at the 30th minute of surgery.

After the patients wake up, another anesthesiologist in the recovery unit will rate the pain of patients in both groups on a scale of 0-10, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to describe their pain intensity. Heart rates and noninvasive blood pressures of patients taken to the recovery unit will be measured and recorded. Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) will be used for postoperative analgesia for all patients, as is routinely done, and total analgesic consumption will be evaluated. Hemodynamic data, VAS pain scores, and observed hemodynamic data of the patients were examined at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, and 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24 hours in the postoperative period. Side effects will be recorded. The evaluation of the pain occurring when the hip is immobilized (VASd) and when it is moved (VASh) will be made by the anesthesiologist with VAS.

Patients' 24-hour postoperative satisfaction will be evaluated. Within the scope of the study, patients' gender, age, height, weight, ASA risk scores and operation times will be recorded.

In the statistical evaluation of the study; Analgesic consumption during the procedure, VAS scores, and analgesic consumption and patient satisfaction in the postoperative period will be evaluated and compared between groups.

Primary outcome measures

  • Visual Analogue Score [Time frame: 2-3 hours after surgery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over the age of 18 and under the age of 65 who will undergo hip arthroscopy
  • ASA I-II group patients
  • Patients without allergies
  • Patients without psychiatric disorders
  • Patients without opioid addiction
  • Patients who have the ability to use the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and perform VAS scoring
  • Patients with no contraindications for peripheral blocks

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not want to participate in the study
  • Patients with uncontrolled hypertension
  • Patients with chronic pain or receiving pain treatment,
  • Significant Cardiac Disorder (Coronary Artery Disease, Arrhythmia, Electrocardiography Anomaly, Heart Failure, etc.)
  • Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06672289 · 2024/162

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗