Menu
Recruiting NCT06662279

Hyrax Vs. Invisalign Palatal Expander Clinical Study

No phase Interventional Malocclusions Narrow Maxilla Narrow Maxillary Arch Crowding

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Removable Rapid Palatal Expander, Banded Palatal Expander.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Malocclusions, Narrow Maxilla, Narrow Maxillary Arch, Crowding. Basic parameters: 6 years — 11 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The purpose of this study is to compare expansion result and the overall experience between the Invisalign Palatal Expander and the Hyrax expander.

Interventions

  • Device Removable Rapid Palatal Expander
    Removable palatal expander where expanders are changed to obtain up to .25mm expansion per expander
  • Device Banded Palatal Expander
    Palatal expander cemented into mouth where a screw is turned to obtain .25mm expansion per turn

Primary outcome measures

  • width of palate after expansion [Time frame: from enrollment to study completion, approximately 4 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject ages 6-11 years old
  • Subject must need maxillary expansion
  • Subjects must have erupted dentition in the area of the primary molars or permanent premolars and the first permanent molar

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with palatal exostosis/surface aberration/ cleft palate
  • Subject's dentition not compatible with device or allergy to device materials
  • Subject with active caries, periodontal disease, TMD

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 4 centers
  • Orange Coast Orthodontics — Laguna Hills
  • Spillers Orthodontics — Warner Robins
  • Innovative Orthodontic Centers — Naperville
  • The Orthodontic Studio — Chevy Chase

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06662279 · A025375

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗