Menu
Recruiting NCT06624826

Visual Performance of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality

No phase Interventional Cataract

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Emmetropic modality, Monovision modality.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Cataract. Basic parameters: 21 years — 105 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Austria
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Difference in Visual Performance of a Refractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality

Overview

Comparison of the visual performance of a refractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens in an emmetropic or monovision modality

Detailed description

With an expanding market of different types of intraocular lenses (IOL), spectacle independence is a rising aim in modern cataract surgery. The procedure has in many cases changed from a vision restoring to a presbyopia correcting approach. Although bilateral monofocal IOL implantation, aiming for emmetropia, leads to high levels of patient satisfaction for distance vision, spectacle dependence for reading and intermediate vision tasks is the usual result.

The option commonly used to achieve spectacle independence at intermediate distance (e.g., PC work) is the implantation of enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. These IOLs have an extended far focus area which reaches to the intermediate distance, providing high-quality vision over a continuous range of focus, rather than distinct foci with blur in between. In the last years several technologies for EDOF IOLs appeared on the market. The spectrum ranges from small aperture design, bioanalogic design, to diffractive and non-diffractive optics. The disadvantage compared to monofocal lenses in all the technologies mentioned is the potentially worse distance vision and contrast sensitivity as well as dysphotopsia.

A new refractive EDOF lens segment with an extended depth of vision was introduced which promises an increased range of functional vision and less dysphotopsias compared to diffractive EDOF lenses. These non-diffractive IOLs are believed to be a presbyopia correcting alternative for people with existing corneal or macula pathologies, which would preclude them from receiving premium lenses because of the loss of light in the diffractive process. To increase spectacle independence for these patients, IOLs may be used in a monovision modality, with an offset of up to 1.5dpt. This method showed good results in the literature so far for monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.

Aim of the study is to compare a new non-diffractive EDOF-IOL, namely the PureSee, set for emmetropia or monovision.

120 eyes of 60 patients will be included into this study. Patients will be either randomized in the emmetropia or the monovision group

Follow-up visits will be 1 week after each surgery and 3 months post-surgically. During these visits, the clinical variables to be assessed will be visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and binocular defocus curves.

Interventions

  • Device Emmetropic modality
    PureSee IOL, emmetropic modality
  • Device Monovision modality
    PureSee IOL, monovision modality

Primary outcome measures

  • Corrected and uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near distance [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Corrected and uncorrected binocular visual acuity for distance [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Corrected and uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate distance [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Contrast sensitivity [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Subjective quality of vision [Time frame: 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Age-related bilateral cataract
  • Age 21 or older
  • Visual acuity \> 0.05
  • Axial length: 21.00-27.00mm
  • Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically relevant
  • Written informed consent prior to surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • Active ocular disease (e.g chronic uveitis, diabetic retinopathy, chronic glaucoma not responsive to medication, corneal dystrophies, etc.) precluding good post-operative visual acuity
  • Relevant other ophthalmic diseases such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX)
  • Irregular astigmatism on corneal tomography
  • Pronounced dry eye disease
  • Previous ocular surgery or trauma
  • Persons who are pregnant or nursing (pregnancy test will be taken in women of reproductive age)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Austria · 1 center
  • Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery — Vienna

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06624826 · PureSee MiniMonovision

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗