Alveolar Recruitment in Obese Patients in Major Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: alveolar recruitment strategy applied group, group without alveolar recruitment strategy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Gynecologic Cancers. Basic parameters: from 18 years · Female.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
The Effect of Alveolar Recruitment on Perioperative Outcomes in Obese Patients in Major Gynaecological Cancer Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
Overview
In this study, the investigators planned to evaluate the effect of alveolar recruitment strategy primarily on postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients undergoing lung protective ventilation in major open gynaeco-oncological surgeries. Our other aim was to evaluate perioperative haemodynamics, respiratory mechanics,inpatient length of stay.
Detailed description
In the gynaecological oncology clinic of our hospital, open major surgeries for endometrial or ovarian cancer are performed very frequently. In these surgeries, the abdomen is open to the operating theatre environment and the lithotomy and trendelenburg position may have negative consequences on the respiratory system in patients. Intraoperative lung protective ventilation strategies are recommended to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. In the lung protective ventilation strategy, positive end-expiratory pressure is recommended in addition to 6-8 ml/kg tidal volume according to ideal body weight. In addition, alveolar recruitment strategy can be applied. For this purpose, the investigators planned to evaluate the effect of alveolar recruitment strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who underwent lung protective ventilation in major open gynaecooncological surgeries. Our secondary aim was to evaluate perioperative haemodynamics, respiratory mechanics, inpatient length of stay.
Interventions
- Device alveolar recruitment strategy applied group
the effect of alveolar recruitment strategy on the mechanical parameters of the patients - Drug group without alveolar recruitment strategy
effect on mechanical parameters of patients without alveolar recruitment strategy
Primary outcome measures
- postoperative pulmonary complications [Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- intraoperative haemodynamic parameters [Time frame: intraoperatively]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients with ASAII and III
- BMI>30 kg/m2 ,<40 kg/m2
- Patients with an ARISCAT risk score of 26-44
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with an Assessment of Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT) risk score > 44
- BMI > 40 kg/m2 patients
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
- Duygu Akyol — Istanbul
Publications
- Pereira SM, Tucci MR, Morais CCA, Simoes CM, Tonelotto BFF, Pompeo MS, Kay FU, Pelosi P, Vieira JE, Amato MBP. Individual Positive End-expiratory Pressure Settings Optimize Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Reduce Postoperative Atelectasis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Dec;129(6):1070-1081. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002435. PMID 30260897
- Park SH. Perioperative lung-protective ventilation strategy reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracic and major abdominal surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Feb;69(1):3-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.1.3. Epub 2016 Jan 28. PMID 26885294
- Spieth PM, Guldner A, Uhlig C, Bluth T, Kiss T, Conrad C, Bischlager K, Braune A, Huhle R, Insorsi A, Tarantino F, Ball L, Schultz MJ, Abolmaali N, Koch T, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M; PROtective Ventilation (PROVE) Network. Variable versus conventional lung protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery (PROVAR): a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;120(3):581-591. PMID 29452815
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06619626 · 2023-583