Manual Debridement vs Phototherapeutic Keratectomy in the Treatment of Corneal Basement Membrane Dystrophy
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Manual debridement, Phototherapeutic keratectomy.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Canada
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Manual Debridement and Phototherapeutic Keratectomy (PTK) in the Treatment of Corneal Basement Membrane Dystrophy
Overview
Of the few comparisons made in the existing literature, the results of PTK are comparable to those documented for manual debridement (MD). However, the shorter length of follow-up in patients with MD may have underestimated the associated complications. Our study, therefore, aims to offer a comparison between these two techniques to clarify the choice of effective treatment with a good safety profile.
Detailed description
Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy (EBMD) affects the anterior cornea, impacting about 2% of the population. EBMD is characterized by alterations and duplications of the basement membrane, a tissue layer that connects the epithelium to the underlying eye tissue. Dysfunction of the basement membrane prevents proper adhesion of the overlying epithelium, leading to recurrent corneal erosions. Additionally, tissue protrusions infiltrate the epithelium, creating surface irregularities that cause symptoms like blurred vision and irregular corneal topographies. This abnormal proliferation results in microcysts and corneal irregularities resembling fingerprints and maps. These surface irregularities can be observed in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images showing epithelial thickening. Non-invasive medical treatments are the first line of therapy, including lubricating drops and hypertonic solutions to protect the ocular surface and promote epithelial adhesion. For corneal erosions, soft contact lenses are used to aid healing. Surgical interventions such as manual debridement and phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) are required in refractory cases. These are also indicated for patients preparing for cataract surgery to optimize preoperative corneal measurements and postoperative optical outcomes. Manual debridement (MD), a technique since 1952, involves scraping off the irregular epithelium to allow a new layer to form. Some surgeons use 20% ethanol on the cornea before scraping with a blade or sponge, preserving the basement membrane. This method is simple, cost-effective, and has an 85% success rate in treating recurrent corneal erosions. However, recurrence rates are up to 24%, with the first recurrence typically within six months. Corneal opacities can form between 7 and 41 days post-procedure. Over the past two decades, PTK has become increasingly used for anterior corneal pathologies, including EBMD. PTK uses a 193nm excimer laser to break molecular bonds between cells on the epithelial surface. It is considered a more reliable, safe, and precise alternative to manual debridement, completely obliterating the basement membrane and potentially reducing recurrence rates. Success rates without recurrence range from 46% to 100%, with minimal complications. Unlike manual debridement, PTK may induce a hyperopic shift, which stabilizes within a year. Corneal erosions and pain recur at about 13% over an average of 9.7 months. Comparative studies between these two methods are scarce, and more data is needed to favor one technique over the other. Limited comparisons suggest PTK results are comparable to manual debridement, though shorter follow-ups in MD patients may underestimate associated complications. Our study aims to compare these techniques to describe the efficacy and safety of both treatments.
Interventions
- Procedure Manual debridement
Traditional technique which consists of scraping off the irregular epithelium to allow a new layer to form. - Procedure Phototherapeutic keratectomy
New technique which has been increasingly used and which consists of a 193nm excimer laser that breaks molecular bonds between cells on the epithelial surface.
Primary outcome measures
- The recurrence rate of corneal basement membrane dystrophy [Time frame: Day 1, week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
- Corneal haze formation assessed by a corneal haze gradation scale [Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months]
- Contrast sensitivity with the CSV-1000 Contrast Sensitivity chart with glare [Time frame: 1,3,6,12 and 24 months]
- Patient comfort using the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale [Time frame: Day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12]
- Post-operative complications [Time frame: Day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, month 6 and month 12]
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) [Time frame: 1,3,6,12 and 24 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patient over 18 years of age;
- Ability to give free and informed consent
- At least 1-year follow-up possible
- Patients with bilateral basal membrane corneal dystrophy who are symptomatic (recurrent corneal erosions, visual disturbances) and are candidates for bilateral surgery.
Exclusion criteria
- Patient under 18 years of age;
- History of ocular infection with herpes simplex virus.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Canada · 1 center
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) — Montreal
Publications
- Lee WS, Lam CK, Manche EE. Phototherapeutic keratectomy for epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 16;11:15-22. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S122870. eCollection 2017. PMID 28031698
- Pogorelov P, Langenbucher A, Kruse F, Seitz B. Long-term results of phototherapeutic keratectomy for corneal map-dot-fingerprint dystrophy (Cogan-Guerry). Cornea. 2006 Aug;25(7):774-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214801.02195.d4. PMID 17068452
- Gaster RN, Ben Margines J, Gaster DN, Li X, Rabinowitz YS. Comparison of the Effect of Epithelial Removal by Transepithelial Phototherapeutic Keratectomy or Manual Debridement on Cross-linking Procedures for Progressive Keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2016 Oct 1;32(10):699-704. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160712-01. PMID 27722758
- Deshmukh R, Reddy JC, Rapuano CJ, Vaddavalli PK. Phototherapeutic keratectomy: Indications, methods and decision making. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2856-2866. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1524_20. PMID 33229661
- Yeu E, Hashem O, Sheha H. Treatment of Epithelial Basement Membrane Dystrophy to Optimize the Ocular Surface Prior to Cataract Surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 15;16:785-795. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S356421. eCollection 2022. PMID 35321046
- Buffault J, Zeboulon P, Liang H, Chiche A, Luzu J, Robin M, Rabut G, Labetoulle M, Labbe A, Baudouin C. Assessment of corneal epithelial thickness mapping in epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0239124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239124. eCollection 2020. PMID 33237913
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06618508 · 2025-12106