Menu
Recruiting NCT06605755

Safety and Immunogenicity of DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine in Chinese 2-month-old Infants

No phase Interventional Pertussis Diphtheria Tetanus Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Different immunization regiments with DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pertussis, Diphtheria, Tetanus, Haemophilus Influenzae Type B Infection. Basic parameters: 19 months — 22 months · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Extended Study on the Safety and Immunogenicity of DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine in Chinese 2-month-old Infants: a Randomized, Prospective, Open Clinical Study

Overview

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate immune persistence at 30 and 36 Months of Age and Pertussis Breakthrough Infections between 19 and 36 Months of Age following two regiments of DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine in Healthy 2-Month-Old Infants and Children in China.

Detailed description

This study was based on the DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine Basic Immunization Strategy Optimization Study Cohort ("Pentavalent Vaccine Cohort") and the Epidemiological Investigation of Carrying Status of Pathogens Causing Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) in Infants and Young Children Cohort ("Pathogen Surveillance Cohort").

DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccine basic immunization strategy optimization study is a single-center, randomized, prospective and open clinical trial. The study was designed for two groups: 2, 3, 4, 18 months of age (control group) and 2, 4, 6, 18 months of age (intervention group). Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups according to the principle of informed consent. Collect basic demographic information of children and their families. The control group received 3 doses of acellular DPT vaccine at 2, 3 and 4 months of age respectively, and 1 dose at 18 months of age; The intervention group received 3 doses of acellular DPT vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age respectively, and 1 dose at 18 months of age. The immunogenicity and safety were observed before and after 28 days of 3 doses of basal immunization, and after 28 days of enhanced immunization at 18 months of age.

The pathogen surveillance team included 2-month-old infants and caregivers with whom they shared a life history. After informed consent, the researchers followed up the subjects from 2 months of age to 19 months of age. The main contents of the visit are sample collection and unified questionnaire survey.

On the basis of the surveillance of ARI aged 2 to 19 months, follow-up was conducted for 17 months. During the follow-up period, ARI telephone visit was conducted twice a week. After ARI was found, pathogen sampling and testing were conducted for them (participants and their caregivers) to monitor the emergence of pertussis infection. Blood samples and throat swabs were collected at 30 and 36 months of age (caregivers were also required to take simultaneous samples), and penta vaccine immunity persistence was observed and multiple respiratory pathogens were monitored.

Interventions

  • Procedure Different immunization regiments with DTaP-IPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine
    The test vaccine in this study was Pentaxim®, a pentavalent vaccine produced by Sanofi Pasteur, France.This vaccine is a combination vaccine consisting of adsorbed acellular DTP and inactivated polio vaccine (DTaP-IPV) and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib). 1. Intervention group: 1 dose of experimental vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and 1 dose of enhanced vaccine at 18 months of age. 2. Control group: 1 dose of experimental vaccine at 2, 3 and 4 months of age, and 1 do

Primary outcome measures

  • Anti-pertussis toxin, anti-pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin, anti-pertussis adhesin, anti-pertussis FIM2, anti-pertussis FIM3 .Anti-diphtheria, anti-tetanus, anti-HIB PRP and anti-type 1, 2 and 3 poliomyelitis antibody levels . [Time frame: 30 months of age]
  • Anti-pertussis toxin, anti-pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin, anti-pertussis adhesin, anti-pertussis FIM2, anti-pertussis FIM3 .Anti-diphtheria, anti-tetanus, anti-HIB PRP and anti-type 1, 2 and 3 poliomyelitis antibody levels . [Time frame: 36 months of age]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • The positive rate of anti-pertussis toxin, anti-pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin , anti-pertussis adherin, anti-pertussis FIM2, anti-pertussis FIM3 ,anti-diphtheria , anti-tetanus , anti-HIB PRP and anti-type 1, 2, 3 poliomyelitis antibody [Time frame: 30 months of age]
  • The positive rate of anti-pertussis toxin, anti-pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin , anti-pertussis adherin, anti-pertussis FIM2, anti-pertussis FIM3 ,anti-diphtheria , anti-tetanus , anti-HIB PRP and anti-type 1, 2, 3 poliomyelitis antibody [Time frame: 36 months of age]
  • To evaluate the pathogen detection rates of ARI in 2-month-old healthy infants in China after different DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccination programs during 19-36 months of age. [Time frame: 19-36 months of age]
  • To evaluate the pertussis breakthrough infection rate in healthy infants and young children aged 19 to 36 months after receiving DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccine. [Time frame: 19-36 months of age]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

\- (1)Received 4 doses of DTaP-IPV/Hib pentavalent vaccines (2) Obtained consent from the participant's caregiver and sign an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

-(1) Diagnosed by a physician with a coagulation abnormality (e.g., coagulation factor deficiency, coagulopathy, platelet abnormality) (2) Any other factor considered to make participation in the trial unsuitable.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Jingsu Provincial Centre of Disease Control and Prevention — Nanjing

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06605755 · JSVCT-ZL03

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗