Menu
Recruiting NCT06604572

TAPP and Open Repair for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

No phase Interventional Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Transabdominal preperitoneal approach.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Recurrent Inguinal Hernia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Clinical Study of Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach Versus Open Tension-free Hernia Repair for the Treatment of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia

Overview

The objective of this study was to explore the clinical efficacy of transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) and open tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia. This study aims to provide a basis for selecting the optimal treatment methods for recurrent hernias.

Detailed description

The patients were randomly allocated to the TAPP group and the open tension-free repair group. We recorded the general situation, operation time, and intraoperative complications; postoperative visual analogue pain scale (VAS) scores at 24 and 48 h; and the incidence of complications such as seroma, chronic pain, inguinal numbness, foreign body sensation, and recurrence at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. These indicators were compared between the two groups of patients.

Interventions

  • Procedure Transabdominal preperitoneal approach
    The enrolled patients underwent either open tension-free hernia repair or Transabdominal preperitoneal approach

Primary outcome measures

  • Postoperation pain [Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, three months after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • Numbness and foreign body sensation [Time frame: The mean follow-up time was 10 months after surgery]
  • Operating time [Time frame: During surgery]
  • Hemorrhage [Time frame: During surgery]
  • Urinary retention [Time frame: One week after surgery]
  • Seroma [Time frame: The mean follow-up time was 2 weeks after surgery]
  • Recurrence [Time frame: The mean follow-up time was 1 year after surgery]
  • Fever [Time frame: One week after surgery]
  • Length of hospital stay [Time frame: Within a week of surgery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years
  • the diagnosis of recurrent inguinal hernia made by ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) during the present visit
  • ability to tolerate general anesthesia and local anesthesia surgery
  • all patients and their families agreed to participate in this study and sign relevant informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • patch infection during the first surgery
  • multiple (≥ 2) relapses
  • inability to cooperate to complete follow-up after surgery

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Clinical study of recurrent inguinal hernia — Kunming

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06604572 · PJ-2022-85

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗