Menu
Recruiting NCT06598852

To Compare the Analgesic Effects of Different Nerve Block Analgesia Methods in Thoracoscopic Surgery

No phase Interventional Postoperative Analgesia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: TPVB group, ESPB group, TPVB combined ESPB group, ICNB group.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Postoperative Analgesia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 70 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Official title

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block, Erector Spinae Muscle Block, Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined with Erector Spinae Muscle Block, and Intercostal Nerve Block in Thoracoscopic Surgery

Overview

Comparison of analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae muscle block, thoracic paravertebral block combined with erector spinae muscle block, and intercostal nerve block in thoracoscopic surgery

Detailed description

120 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into ESPB group (E group, n=30), TPVB group (T group, n=30), ESPB combine with TPVB group (ET group, n=30), ICNB group (I group, n=30). Patients in ESPB group underwent erector spinal block under ultrasound after anesthesia induction; Patients in TPVB group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block after anesthesia induction; Patients in ESPB group combined with TPVB group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with erectoralis muscle block after anesthesia induction; Patients in INB group received intraoperative intercostal nerve block by the operator. All groups of patients received postoperative controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain 1h (T1), 24h (T2) and 48h (T3) after surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate at T1-T3 were recorded, as well as the number of effective analgesic pump compression, the amount of sufentanil and the number of relief analgesia within 48h after surgery. The occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, retention time of thoracic drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusion, respiratory failure, etc.) were recorded.

Interventions

  • Other TPVB group
    Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in TPVB Group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block with 0.33% ropivacaine 30ml under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction for postoperative analgesia.
  • Other ESPB group
    Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in ESPB Group received erector spinae muscle block with 0.33% ropivacaine 30ml under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction for postoperative analgesia.
  • Other TPVB combined ESPB group
    Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in TPVB combined ESPB group received thoracic paravertebral block combined with erector spinae muscle block with 0.33% ropivacaine 30ml under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction for postoperative analgesia.
  • Other ICNB group
    Patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery underwent general anesthesia and patients in ICNB Group received intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia.

Primary outcome measures

  • Postoperative pain score [Time frame: 48 hours after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Incidence of postoperative complications [Time frame: 48 hours after surgery]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I-II; (2) Age: 18-70 years old (3) double-hole thoracic surgery was performed; (4) Agree to participate in this study and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • (1) People who are allergic to anesthetics used in this study; (2) Patients with coagulation disorders (3) patients with severe heart disease, liver or renal insufficiency; (4) have a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid users (5) have a co-existing mental illness and are not fully capable of cooperating

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • First hospital of Qinhuangdao — Qinhuangdao

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06598852 · liuzhuo

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗