Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06587672

Factors Affecting Selection of Leadless Pacemaker and Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Status

Observational Pacemaker Atrioventricular Block Clinical Trials Pacing

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Micra AV implantation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pacemaker, Atrioventricular Block, Clinical Trials, Pacing. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Factors Affecting Selection of Leadless Pacemaker in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing Status With a Micra AV: a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study

Overview

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study ,the aim of this study is to find factors affecting selection of double-chamber leadless pacemaker in patients with atrioventricular block and ambulatory atrioventricular synchronous pacing status over time using a leadless ventricular pacemaker.

Detailed description

Traditional pacemakers consist of a pulse generator and leads. Infections of the pulse generator pocket and lead-related complications are unavoidable issues in the application oftraditional pacemakers.Leadless pacemakers have emerged to address complications associated with the pacemaker pocket and leads in specific patients.The initial design of leadless pacemakers focused on single-chamber (right ventricular)sensing and pacing,However, patients with sinus rhythm may experience pacemakersyndrome symptoms due to atrioventricular desynchrony. Furthermore, a high proportion of atrioventricular dyssynchronous ventricular pacing might increase hospitalization rates for atrial fibrillation and heart failure.Recent developments in leadless dual-chamber pacemakersutilize a built-in triaxial accelerometer.This study aims to investigate factors considered by patients with atrioventricular block and clinical pacemaker implanting physicians when make sure the use of Micra AV. 2). It also seeks to evaluate the atrioventricular synchrony of Micra AV pacing in patients during both exercise and rest, while analyzing factors that influence the AV synchrony.For all screened patients, a questionnaire is required to be finished with data including age, gender, occupation, educational level, clinical history, comorbidities, previous infections, history of implanted electronic devices, economic status, and medical insurance conditions. At same time, all physicians are asked to complete a questionnaire for analyzing the factors influencing the decision of device option.An ambulatory electrocardiogram will be performed at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up after device implantation. Data regarding the proportion of atrioventricular Research Protocol Template (Observational Study)\_V1.0\_2023.10.04 7/10 synchrony, atrial sensing atrial contraction mechanical wave (A4) threshold, ventricular pacing threshold, sensing, and impedance will be tested and collected. Postoperative exercise related symptoms and adverse events will be routinely tracked.

Interventions

  • Device Micra AV implantation
    Patients received Micra AV implantation

Primary outcome measures

  • Complete the survey questionnair before implanting a pacemaker [Time frame: 1 day before implanting a pacemaker]
  • The percentage of atrioventricular synchrony at 3 months after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3 months post-implant]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Immediate success rate of Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: During implantation on day 0]
  • The percentage of atrioventricular synchrony at 6, 12 months after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 6, 12 months post-implant]
  • Ventricular pacing threshold, at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3, 6, 12months post-implant]
  • Ventricular sensing at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-implant]
  • Impedance at 3 months, 6months, and 1 year after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-implant]
  • Major complications related to the device implantation at perioperative period, and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after Micra AV implantation [Time frame: Days 0,1 and 3, 6, 9, 12 months post- implant]
  • All-cause mortality rates at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3, 6, 9, 12 months post-implant]
  • Rehospitalization events related to heart failure at 3 months, 6 months, and 1year after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months post-implant]
  • Tachycardia related to the pacemaker, or adverse events related to the device or algorithm at 3, 6, 12 months after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 3,6,12 months post-implant]
  • Left venriculat ejection fraction measured by echocardiography at 6, 12 months after Micra AV implanted [Time frame: 6, 12 months post-implant]
  • Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter measured by echocardiography at 6, 12 months after Micra AV implantation. [Time frame: 6, 12 months post-implant]
  • Parameter adjustment events related to the synchrony less than 70% at 3, 6, 12 months after Micra AV implantation.. [Time frame: 3, 6, 12months post-implant]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with atrioventricular conduction block, meeting the indications for dual-chamber leadless pacemakers as per the "Chinese Expert Consensus on Clinical Application of Leadless Pacemakers (2022)".
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Expected lifespan ≥1 year.
  • Consent to sign an informed consent form and cooperate in the collection of baseline data and subsequent follow-ups

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients anticipated to have a high ventricular pacing proportion (>40%) and with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%.
  • Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and a high expected ventricular pacing proportion.
  • Post-tricuspid valve mechanical valve replacement surgery.
  • Patients with inferior vena cava pathway anomalies, precluding passage of the leadless pacemaker's delivery sheath.
  • Patients with an expected lifespan of less than 1 year. 6 Patients who are pregnant, planning pregnancy, or undergoing cardiac transplantation.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

China · 2 centers
  • Fu Wai Hospital — Beijing
  • Peking University First Hospital — Beijing

Publications

  • Wilkoff BL. How to treat and identify device infections. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Nov;4(11):1467-70. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Aug 11. No abstract available. PMID 17954409
  • Johansen JB, Jorgensen OD, Moller M, Arnsbo P, Mortensen PT, Nielsen JC. Infection after pacemaker implantation: infection rates and risk factors associated with infection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutive patients. Eur Heart J. 2011 Apr;32(8):991-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq497. Epub 2011 Jan 20. PMID 21252172
  • Knops RE, Tjong FV, Neuzil P, Sperzel J, Miller MA, Petru J, Simon J, Sediva L, de Groot JR, Dukkipati SR, Koruth JS, Wilde AA, Kautzner J, Reddy VY. Chronic performance of a leadless cardiac pacemaker: 1-year follow-up of the LEADLESS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 21;65(15):1497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.022. PMID 25881930
  • Reddy VY, Knops RE, Sperzel J, Miller MA, Petru J, Simon J, Sediva L, de Groot JR, Tjong FV, Jacobson P, Ostrosff A, Dukkipati SR, Koruth JS, Wilde AA, Kautzner J, Neuzil P. Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial. Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1466-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987. Epub 2014 Mar 24. PMID 24664277
  • Reynolds DW, Ritter P. A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 30;374(26):2604-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1604852. No abstract available. PMID 27355552
  • Ann HW, Ahn JY, Jeon YD, Jung IY, Jeong SJ, Joung B, Lee M, Ku NS, Han SH, Kim JM, Choi JY. Incidence of and risk factors for infectious complications in patients with cardiac device implantation. Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;36:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 14. PMID 25980618

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06587672 · 2024-ZX028

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗