Menu
Recruiting NCT06578767

Decompression of Pudendal and Inferior Cluneal Nerves Using Robot-assisted Laparoscopy for Entrapment Neuralgias : the X-DECO Study

Observational Pudendal Neuralgia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
This is an observational study: the protocol does not assign a study treatment.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Pudendal Neuralgia. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Decompression of Pudendal and Inferior Cluneal Nerves Using Robot-assisted Laparoscopy for Entrapment Neuralgias: Results After 1 Year of Follow-up (the X-DECO Study)

Overview

The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of the laparoscopic robot-assited approach after 1 year of follow-up, on pain experience, and anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress syndrome and quality of life.

Detailed description

Pudendal and inferior cluneal neuralgias are responsible for chronic pelvic perineal pain. The compression of both of the nerves are thought to be associated in approximately 25% of the pudendal neuralgias. The failure of the isolated pudendal decompression led in the early 2000s to the identification of an entrapment syndrome of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve and its inferior cluneal branche around the ischial tuberosity. This subsequent neuralgia affects the posterior part of the perineum, lower buttock, and the posterior part of the thigh, without any associated neuro-vegetative symptoms, unlike in pudendal neuralgia. In case of failure of the medical treatment, the open trans-gluteal decompression was proposed as a gold standard. However, this technique remains invasive and requires a long recovery. In a previous study, the investigators demonstrated the feasibility of double decompression via a minimally invasive robot-assisted laparoscopic approach, and described a 4-step technique.

Primary outcome measures

  • Evaluate the efficacy of the surgical technique on pain experience related to pudendal and inferior cluneal chronic entrapment neuralgias, using a composite criteria (Numeric pain scale, time seated, PGIC score) [Time frame: Pré-operatively, 2 days, 4 months, 1 year after surgery]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Report all complications during the follow-up [Time frame: 2 days, 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years after surgery]
  • Evaluate the effect of the surgical technique on anxiety [Time frame: Pré-operatively, 2 days, 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years after surgery]
  • Evaluate the effect of the surgical technique on depression [Time frame: Pré-operatively, 2 days, 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years after surgery]
  • Evaluate the effect of the surgical technique on post-traumatic stress syndrome [Time frame: Pré-operatively, 2 days, 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years after surgery]
  • Evaluate the impact on quality of life [Time frame: Pré-operatively, 2 days, 4 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years after surgery]
  • Long-term efficacy of the surgical technique on pain experience using the composite criteria [Time frame: 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery (24 months ± 2 months; 36, 48 and 60 months ± 3 months)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 18 years old
  • Patients presenting a pudendal and inferior cluneal entrapment neuralgia with 5 positive"Nantes criteria", and failure of the medical treatment
  • Patient having given consent after reading the information note

Exclusion criteria

  • Absence of any "Nantes criteria",
  • Patient non suitable for surgery/general anesthesia

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • UBOSGA — Bordeaux

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06578767 · CERU_2024-034

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗