Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06560723

Implementation of a Personalised Health Plan (PHP) on Patient Quality of Life Score at 2-year Follow-up

No phase Interventional Elderly, Frail

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Quality of life test.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Elderly, Frail. Basic parameters: 70 years — 100 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Identifying and Managing Frailty in the Elderly in a Multiprofessional Health Home

Overview

"Healthy ageing" is not limited to the absence of disease, but implies the "development and maintenance of the functional skills that enable the elderly to enjoy a state of well-being": (for example : the ability to walk, go out, engage in leisure activities, memorize...) It is interesting to study whether the implementation of a Personal Health Plan (PHP) in a Multiprofessional Health Home improves the quality of life of frail elderly people.

Detailed description

"Healthy ageing" is not limited to the absence of disease, but implies the "development and maintenance of the functional skills that enable the elderly to enjoy a state of well-being": (for example : the ability to walk, go out, engage in leisure activities, memorize...) Between "good health" and "dependence", there is a precarious, reversible state of transition known as frailty. There are several simple tools for identifying frailty, such as the GFST (Gerontopole Frailty Screening Tool).

The Gerontopole Frailty Screening Tool and the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, Loss of Weight questionnaire have proved more sensitive. The gold standard for diagnosing and assessing frailty is a comprehensive geriatric assessment based on the multidimensional model of the Standardized Geriatric Assessment (SGA). Its aim is to identify all the medical, functional, psychological and social problems that may affect a frail elderly patient, in order to set up a long-term follow-up project, taking into account the patient's needs.

It is interesting to study whether the implementation of a Personal Health Plan in a Multiprofessional Health Home improves the quality of life of frail elderly people.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test Quality of life test
    The results of the various quality-of-life scores used to compile the study statistics (ADL, iADL, MMS, GDS, MNA, EPICES, SPPB, SF-36) will be provided to the doctor, but without any specific comments or recommendations, and then presented to the patient. Number of emergency room visits and hospitalization days, drug untake evalautions and thepareutic compliance (GIRERD score) will be also collected.

Primary outcome measures

  • Evaluate the effect of implementing a personalized healthcare plan (PPS) on patient quality of life at M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
Secondary outcome measures (11)
  • Patient quality of life at M6 and M12 [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Emergency room visits and hospitalizations at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Drug intake at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Therapeutic compliance at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Patient autonomy at M6, M12 and M24. [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Falls and patient mobility at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Patient nutritional status at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Patient's cognitive status at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Patient's emotional state at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Patient's social fragility at M6, M12 and M24 [Time frame: 2 years]
  • Patient autonomy at M6, M12 and M24. [Time frame: 2 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient ≥ 70 years
  • Autonomous patient (ADL ≥ 5)
  • Patient identified as frail according to the Gérontopôle de Toulouse GFST grid
  • Patient whose primary care physician is in the MSPs of Charleval or Romilly sur Andelle for the intervention group, and in the MSPs of Gaillon and Pont de l'Arche for the control group.
  • Patient living at home or in an RPA
  • Understanding of the French language
  • Patient having read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form
  • Affiliation with a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

  • Hospital geriatric follow-up
  • Geriatric assessment already carried out
  • Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision, or placed under court protection / sub-guardianship or curatorship
  • History of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol, or from giving informed consent.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Non-randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Diagnostic

Study locations

France · 4 centers
  • Charleval — Charleval
  • GAILLON — Gaillon
  • Pont de L'Arche — Pont-de-l'Arche
  • Romilly Sur Andelle — Romilly-sur-Andelle

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06560723 · 2022/0348/HP · 2023-A02358-37

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗