The Crosstalk Between the Epigenome and Mitochondria in SCI

Official title

The Crosstalk Between the Epigenome and Mitochondria as a Novel Therapeutic Target to Counteract Remote Degeneration Induced by Spinal Cord Injury

Overview

SCI is a devastating neurological disorder for which there are not yet restorative therapies. Thus, there is a need to explore new therapeutic strategies to treat SCI patients. To this end an appropriate selection and enrolment of suitable participants is crucial for the success of the therapeutic protocol. The selection of participants in SCI trials is often based on injury categories (e.g. sensorimotor complete vs incomplete), and neglects biological aspects (e.g. biomarkers released into the CSF and/or blood) that may be amenable to specific therapeutic interventions. On a biomolecular standpoint, it is renown that CNS lacks the ability to sustain a complete regenerative response after damage, which is partially due to the inability of damaged neurons to sustain an epigenetic pro-regenerative response. The background of the present protocol study stands in pre-existing data which showed a crosstalk between the epigenome gene and mitochondria activated upon SCI. The clinical branch of this study protocol aims to investigate if and how targeted proteomic changes following the acute and chronic phase of SCI may play a role in determining the severity of neurologic impairments, as determined with ASIA gradingscale system, at the time of patients' presentation and in the conversion of ASIA grade during follow-up. A previous pilot study conducted by Wichmann et al. has shed light on proteomics after SCI enabling a profiling of inflammatory responses after spinal cord injury, timing of proteomics changes involved in inflammatory responses and differences between proteins title in CSF and peripheral blood. On the other hand, authors failed to prove a correlation between inflammatory proteins expression and timing of expression and neurologic status. However, previous studies proved that proteome expression variations SCI-induced can be detected into patients' CSF and serum and that biomarkers released into the CSF and/or blood may provide a plethora of information as to the patients' biological response to SCI. These samples may contain a unique fingerprint that can be used by scientists and clinicians to elucidate the mechanisms underlying irreversible central nervous system (CNS) degeneration following SCI. This could allow treatments to target specific molecules which promote CNS degeneration. Within this context the identification of prognostic biomarkers of SCI will help to assign SCI patients to the correct therapeutic treatment that, in association with canonical therapies, may synergistically act to improve functional recovery. The aim of the present study is to investigate the presence of prognostic markers in SCI patient-derived serum and CSF with respect to a control group of healthy patients.

Detailed description

SCI is a devastating neurological disorder for which there are not yet restorative therapies. Thus, there is a need to explore new therapeutic strategies to treat SCI patients. To this end an appropriate selection and enrolment of suitable participants is crucial for the success of the therapeutic protocol \[1,2\]. The selection of participants in SCI trials is often based on injury categories (e.g. sensorimotor complete vs incomplete), and neglects biological aspects (e.g. biomarkers released into the CSF and/or blood) that may be amenable to specific therapeutic interventions. On a biomolecular standpoint, it is renown that CNS lacks the ability to sustain a complete regenerative response after damage, which is partially due to the inability of damaged neurons to sustain an epigenetic pro-regenerative response \[3\].

The background of the present protocol study stands in pre-existing data which showed a crosstalk between the epigenome gene and mitochondria activated upon SCI. In particular, previous experimental studies conducted on mice red nuclei (RN) demonstrated proteome changes at 7 days and 28 days post-SCI. Further pathway analysis pointed out to the epigenetic enzyme KDM5A as the upstream regulator of this phenotype. KDM5A is a H3K4me3 demethylase protein that plays a fundamental role in mitochondria biogenesis and function whose activity is regulated by mitochondrial metabolites \[4,5\]. Thereby, preliminary data suggest that downregulation of KDM5A activity and increased mitochondrial metabolism are involved in early neuronal response to remote damage. However, its role in brain pathologies such as in SCI remains still unexplored. Since it is well-established that structural and functional damages of mitochondria is an early event that contributed to neuronal cell death, hindering the possibility of axonal regeneration \[6\], the molecular background of the experimental branch of the present protocol study stands in the investigation of epigenetic regulation by KDM5A and mitochondrial function. The clinical branch of this study protocol aims to investigate if and how targeted proteomic changes following the acute and chronic phase of SCI may play a role in determining the severity of neurologic impairments, as determined with ASIA grading scale system, at the time of patients' presentation and in the conversion of ASIA grade during follow-up. A previous pilot study conducted by Wichmann et al. has shed light on proteomics after SCI enabling a profiling of inflammatory responses after spinal cord injury, timing of proteomics changes involved in inflammatory responses and differences between proteins title in CSF and peripheral blood. On the other hand, authors failed to prove a correlation between inflammatory proteins expression and timing of expression and neurologic status \[7\]. However, their paper proved that proteome expression variations SCI-induced can be detected into patients' CSF and serum and that biomarkers released into the CSF and/or blood may provide a plethora of information as to the patients' biological response to SCI. These samples may contain a unique fingerprint that can be used by scientists and clinicians to elucidate the mechanisms underlying irreversible central nervous system (CNS) degeneration following SCI. This could allow treatments to target specific molecules which promote CNS degeneration. Within this context the identification of prognostic biomarkers of SCI will help to assign SCI patients to the correct therapeutic treatment that, in association with canonical therapies, may synergistically act to improve functional recovery.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the presence of prognostic markers in SCI patient-derived serum and CSF with respect to a control group of healthy patients.

Interventions

• Other Data collection
  The data to be collected are the following: * Demographic data: gender and age of the patient at diagnosis of SCI; * Drug assumption and drug abuse at the time of SCI; * A complete assessment of patients' comorbidities; * Complete neurological examination on admission and at 6-8 months follow-up according to ASIA protocol; * Neuro-radiological data: spinal CT and MRI performed within 48 hours of admission to document the type, level and extent of the lesion of the spine and the spinal cord; * C

Primary outcome measures

• Changes from baseline in the proteome profile in serum and CSF samples of SCI patients [Time frame: Months 1-24]

Secondary outcome measures (1)

• Correlation of the proteome profile of SCI patient's with their clinical profile. [Time frame: Months 1-24]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

• ASIA impairment scale grade A, B, or C upon admission;
• neurological level of injury between C1-L1;
• patient older than 18 years;
• ability to collect a valid, reliable baseline neurologic examination within 24h of injury.

Exclusion criteria

• Concomitant TBI;
• major axial or appendicular trauma;
• in case of sedation or intoxication making unreliable the neurological examination.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model

Cohort

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06537427 · 6884

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗