Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06522230

Post Exercise Recovery and FST

No phase Interventional Exercise Therapy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Fascial Stretch Therapy.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Exercise Therapy. Basic parameters: 19 years — 40 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Analyzing the Perceived Impact of Fascial Stretch Therapy on the Post-exercise Recovery Process.

Overview

In this pilot study the focus is to assess the perceived impact of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on post-exercise recovery in University athletes. The objective is to determine if FST can expedite recovery and enhance overall well-being by reducing muscle soreness and fatigue. The FST protocol will be implement by a certified FST level 2 practitioner. Upon completion of the FST intervention athletes will complete a self-assessment questionnaire. The study aims to provide empirical support for FST's efficacy in improving post-exercise recovery and contributing to the health and performance of university athletes.

Detailed description

Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the perceived effects of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on post-exercise recovery among university athletes at UBCO. By focusing solely on this aspect, the study aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how FST influences recovery processes in the context of rigorous athletic training.

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that integrating FST into the post-exercise routine of university athletes will result in expedited recovery, manifested through reduced muscle soreness and fatigue. We expect that the tailored FST sessions will contribute positively to the athletes' overall well-being, allowing them to maintain peak performance levels.

Justification: The justification for this study lies in addressing a gap in current research by honing in on the specific impact of FST on post-exercise recovery. As athletes constantly seek methods to optimize their performance, understanding the potential benefits of FST in this context becomes crucial for informed and evidence-based interventions.

Objectives: The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of FST in enhancing post-exercise recovery among university athletes. Specifically, the study aims to analyze the reduction in muscle soreness and fatigue, providing empirical support for the inclusion of FST in athletic recovery programs.

Research Design: This pilot study adopts a mixed methods one group post-test only design to a allow the understanding of perceived FST in enhancing post-exercise recovery. Participants will complete questionnaires and short semi-structured interviews.

Statistical Analysis: This study will employ descriptive statistical analysis for the questionnaire data and thematic analysis for the interview data.

Interventions

  • Other Fascial Stretch Therapy
    Fascial Stretch Protocol uses a combination of circumduction, traction, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and specific FST maneuvers. Stretch is applied in both active \& passive methods taking into consideration: (1) Oscillatory - slow passive joint oscillations (back and forth movement in a regular rhythm). Small controlled oscillations help with proprioceptors around the joints, acilitates blood flow, gently stretches the ligaments, tendons, nerves, \& muscles and slows the nerv

Primary outcome measures

  • Perceptions of Fascial Stretch Therapy (FST) on Post-Exercise and Post-Training Recovery Among UBCO Varsity Athletes [Time frame: Interviews will be conducted within one week after the completion of the 4th FST session.]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Improvement in overall range of motion and functioning [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month]
  • Improvement in overall range of motion - back [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month]
  • Improvement in overall range of motion - neck [Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be an UBCO student athlete who is at least 19 years of age and currently engaged in normal athletic training

Exclusion criteria

  • Student athletes under 19 years of age or currently have an existing musculoskeletal injury or medical condition preventing you from engaging in normal athletic training.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Batool SA, Shakil-Ul-Rehman S, Tariq Z, Ikram M. Effects of fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 5;24(1):789. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06769-0. PMID 37798756
  • Raja G P, Bhat N S, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Gangavelli R, Davis F, Shankar R, Prabhu A. Effectiveness of deep cervical fascial manipulation and yoga postures on pain, function, and oculomotor control in patients with mechanical neck pain: study protocol of a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Aug 28;22(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05533-w. PMID 34454582
  • Ruiz JJB, Perez-Cruzado D, Llanes RP. Immediate effects of lumbar fascia stretching on hamstring flexibility: A randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):619-627. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210274. PMID 36872764

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06522230 · H24-00681

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗