Menu
Recruiting NCT06507189

Multidimensional Predictive Modeling to Understand Mechanisms of Exercise Response Heterogeneity in Older Adults (M3AX)

No phase Interventional Aging Aging Well

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Combined endurance and resistance training.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Aging, Aging Well. Basic parameters: from 60 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Multidimensional Predictive Modeling to Understand Mechanisms of Exercise Response Heterogeneity in Older Adults

Overview

Aging-related functional declines are thought to be caused by hallmark biological processes that ultimately manifest in physical, mental, and metabolic impairments that compromise healthspan and quality of life. Exercise is a multipotent treatment with promise to mitigate most aging hallmarks, but there is substantial variability in exercisƒe responsiveness. Combining endurance and resistance training in alignment with public health guidelines will be used to better understand variable exercise responsiveness in older adults with the ultimate goal of improving each older adult's capacity to attain the many health benefits of exercise.

Detailed description

Aging-related functional declines are thought to be caused by hallmark biological processes1 that ultimately manifest in physical, mental, and metabolic impairments - compromising healthspan and quality of life (QoL). Exercise is a multipotent treatment with promise to mitigate most aging hallmarks, but there is substantial variability in individual exercise responsiveness. This inter-individual response heterogeneity (IRH) was first identified and extensively interrogated by Bouchard and colleagues in the context of endurance training (ET). Subsequently, the investigators have demonstrated resistance training (RT) IRH and have studied potential IRH mechanisms. The investigators then led multiple trials in older adults examining dose titration, adjuvant nutrition or medication in attempts to lower poor response rates. Many knowledge gaps remain as summarized in the National Institutes of Aging (NIA) workshop on IRH seeding this Requests for Applications (RFA). The investigators have assembled an interdisciplinary team to address the RFA's central goal, "to better understand factors underlying response variability to exercise training in older adults." Although Health and Human Services (HHS) guidelines specify combined ET and RT to maximize health benefits in aging adults, large-scale exercise trials studying IRH (i.e., HERITAGE, MoTrPAC) have restricted participants to a single exercise mode. For this project, the investigators propose the innovative, but logical, strategy to use combined ET and RT. Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF, VO2max) and low functional muscle quality (fMQ; strength/muscle mass) are multi-system manifestations of the deterioration of the cellular hallmarks of aging. Importantly, both CRF and fMQ are modifiable with ET and RT. Thus, the investigators design premise is that combined ET+RT is an excellent strategy for elucidating factors underlying IRH, as it forges a path toward understanding and mitigating IRH in aging with direct translatability to best-evidence public health recommendations.

It is yet to be determined how the hallmarks of aging interact to influence exercise responsiveness. For example, muscle mitochondrial energetics and proteostasis are inextricably linked, and poor responder status may be caused by lack of energetic resources to maintain proteostasis throughout an exercise program. Similarly, aging disrupts circadian clocks, leading to inflammation and disrupted cell signaling, which may also contribute to IRH.

While sources of IRH are a constellation of modifiable and non-modifiable factors, the investigators will test the hypothesis that factors central to aging itself - aging hallmarks such as proteostasis, mitochondrial energetics, and inflammation, as well as systemic and muscle-specific circadian clock function and output - are chief contributors to the multidimensional circuitry that determines whether an individual achieves the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CRF and/or fMQ with exercise training. The investigators will also test the hypothesis that altered exercise dosing coupled with lifestyle recommendations will promote attainment of MCIDs among older adults who do not initially respond. With CRF and fMQ as primary clinical outcomes, the investigators will use a 2-phase Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) of combined ET+RT with clinical phenotyping and blood/muscle molecular and cellular analyses.

Interventions

  • Other Combined endurance and resistance training
    ET will consist of 3x/wk training (MWF) with MF being steady state cycling, treadmill, or elliptical at 70-75% HRR for 30 min and the W session being a 20 min high intensity interval session on a cycle ergometer (1 min on/off; 10 cycles) targeting 85-90% HRR. The treadmill and elliptical on M or F will be provided for variety but the mainstay will be cycle ergometry. On MF participants will complete 3 sets x 8-12 repetitions for leg press, knee extension, hamstring curl, chest press, seated row,

Primary outcome measures

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) [Time frame: 23 weeks]
  • Functional muscle quality (fMQ) [Time frame: 23 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Balance [Time frame: 23 weeks]
  • Cognitive performance [Time frame: 23 weeks]
  • Body composition [Time frame: 23 weeks]
  • Metabolic health [Time frame: 23 weeks]
  • Metabolic health [Time frame: 23 weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female aged 60 or above
  • Free of chronic disease
  • No structured exercise program (2 or more bouts/wk) within previous 12 months
  • Cognitively capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder that would limit ability to perform the exercise and/or testing bouts
  • Cardiopulmonary disorders or reduced breathing capacity
  • Metabolic diseases including markers of liver disease (ALT > 52 U/l) and type 2 diabetes (HbA1C = or > 6.5, fasting blood glucose = or > 126 mg/dl)
  • Any other disease or disorder that would influence exercise response (e.g., chronic kidney disease, dementia, current cancer diagnosis or within 2 yr remission, cerebrovascular disease)
  • Any current infectious disease
  • Life expectancy < 1 year
  • Insulin sensitizing/blood glucose lowering agents such as metformin or metabolic weight loss agents (e.g. GLP-1 agonists)
  • High dose statin (dose equivalent of 40 mg/d or higher simvastatin)
  • Lidocaine allergy
  • Regular tobacco use and/or vaping
  • Excessive alcohol consumption (3 drinks/d or 7 drinks/wk for females; 4 drinks/d or 14 drinks/wk for males)
  • BMI 35.0 kg/m2 or higher
  • Unable to commit to \~6 months required to complete the study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition — Pensacola
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — Oklahoma City

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06507189 · IRB-2024-0083

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗