Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation With Optimized Settings on Wet Mucus Volume During Invasive Ventilation
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: MI-E Intervention protocol, Standard MI-E setting.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Mucus Retention, Mechanical Ventilation Complication. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Spain
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation With Optimized Settings on Suctioned Wet Mucus Volume During Invasive Ventilation
Overview
Retention of airway secretions is a frequent complication in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV).This complication is often due to excessive secretion production and ineffective secretion clearance. Mechanical insufflator-exsufflator (MI-E) is a respiratory physiotherapy technique that aims to assist or simulate a normal cough by using an electro-mechanical dedicated device. A positive airway pressure is delivered to the airways, in order to hyperinflate the lungs, followed by a rapid change to negative pressure that promotes a rapid exhalation and enhances peak expiratory flows. However, there is no consensus on the best MI-E settings to facilitate secretion clearance in these patients. Inspiratory and expiratory pressures of ±40 cmH2O and inspiratory-expiratory time of 3 and 2 seconds, respectively, are often used as a standard for MI-E programming in the daily routine practice, but recent laboratory studies have shown significant benefits when MI-E setting is optimized to promote an expiratory flow bias. The investigators designed this study to compare the effects of MI-E with an optimized setting versus a standard setting on the wet volume of suctioned sputum in intubated critically ill patients on invasive MV for more than 48 hours.
Detailed description
Retention of airway secretions is a frequent complication in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). This complication is often due to excessive secretion production and ineffective secretion clearance. One of the main causes is the presence of an endotracheal tube (ETT) which has been shown to decrease mucociliary clearance and hinders the generation of adequate peak expiratory flows when coughing. Other factors such as suboptimal airway humidification, inspiratory flow bias, semi-recumbent position, prolonged immobilization and respiratory muscles weakness further impair sputum clearance. Mucus retention may impede optimal gas exchange, and lead to atelectasis, increased work of breathing, bacterial colonization and development of pulmonary infections, prolonging the need for MV. These conditions, added to initial factors, increase morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, making secretion clearance an essential factor for patients' prognosis.
Secretion removal techniques, such as, manual or mechanical hyperinflations, chest vibrations or expiratory rib cage compressions, prior to suctioning, are commonly used by physiotherapists in intensive care units (ICU). However, the evidence assessing respiratory physiotherapy techniques in critically ill patients is scant and sometimes inconsistent, making it difficult to extrapolate the results and standardize the clinical practice. Moreover, the execution of these techniques often differs among professionals based on their experience, training, and resources availability.
Mechanical insufflator-exsufflator (MI-E) is a respiratory physiotherapy technique that aims to assist or simulate a normal cough by using an electro-mechanical dedicated device. A positive airway pressure is delivered to the airways, in order to hyperinflate the lungs, followed by a rapid change to negative pressure that promotes a rapid exhalation and enhances peak expiratory flows. MI-E is commonly used in patients with ineffective cough mainly due to respiratory pump failure (i.e: neuromuscular patients), and has been proposed in recent years as a technique with great potential to non-invasively clear secretions in the critically ill. Indeed, recent studies have evaluated safety and efficacy of MI-E in intubated critically ill patients with promising results and no associated adverse events. However, there is no consensus on the best MI-E settings to facilitate secretion clearance in these patients. Inspiratory and expiratory pressures of ±40 cmH2O and inspiratory-expiratory time of 3 and 2 seconds, respectively, are often used as a standard for MI-E programming in the daily routine practice, but recent laboratory studies have shown significant benefits when MI-E setting is optimized to promote an expiratory flow bias. For instance, Volpe et al. achieved significant differences in artificial mucus displacement when inspiratory flows were lowered, inspiratory time was increased to 4 seconds, and expiratory flow bias was enhanced by increasing the expiratory pressure over the inspiratory pressure. More recently, evidence from a swine model confirmed the improvement in mucus movement velocity when expiratory pressure was enhanced to increase the difference between inspiratory and expiratory pressures (i.e: +40/-70cmH2O). Importantly, increased inspiratory pressures should be avoided to prevent movement of mucus toward the lungs and potential associated detrimental effects such as alveolar damage or hemodynamic impairment.
The investigators designed this study to compare the effects of MI-E with an optimized setting versus a standard setting on the wet volume of suctioned sputum in intubated critically ill patients on invasive MV for more than 48 hours.
Interventions
- Device MI-E Intervention protocol
The endotracheal tube cuff will be inflated to 40 cmH2O and MI-E device will be used to deliver MI-E in automatic mode, with 4 sets of 5 respiratory cycles each and a 1-minute interval between each set. Before initiation of the MI-E intervention protocol, the investigators will carry out a short-period test to find the appropriate MI-E settings to achieve inspiratory volumes of ≥1 liter and PEF ≥80 L/min. Concretely, inspiratory and expiratory time will always be set at 4 seconds and 2 seconds, - Device Standard MI-E setting
Cough Assist E70 device (Philips Respironics, USA, Andover, Massachusetts) will be used to deliver MI-E in automatic mode, with 4 sets of 5 respiratory cycles each and a 1-minute interval between each set. During the 1-minute pause between sets, the patient will be reconnected to the ventilator to avoid desaturation and de-recruitment during procedures. PEEP will remain stable during the protocol. The standard MI-E setting will consist of in-expiratory pressures of +40/-40 cmH2O, medium inspira
Primary outcome measures
- Wet volume of sputum [Time frame: Immediately after each intervention]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
- Respiratory parameters: Inspiratory flow (PIF) [Time frame: Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated]
- Respiratory parameters: Peak expiratory flow (PEF) [Time frame: Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated]
- Respiratory parameters: difference between PEF-PIF; [Time frame: Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated]
- Respiratory parameters: PEF:PIF ratio [Time frame: Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated]
- Pulmonary mechanics parameters: Static Compliance (Cst) [Time frame: Airway pressures will be recorded before, immediately after MI-E intervention, after endotracheal suctioning, and 1h after endotracheal suctioning. Respiratory system compliance and airway resistance will be calculated using standard formulas.]
- Pulmonary mechanics parameters: Airway resistance (Raw) [Time frame: Airway pressures will be recorded before, immediately after MI-E intervention, after endotracheal suctioning, and 1h after endotracheal suctioning. Respiratory system compliance and airway resistance will be calculated using standard formulas.]
- Hemodynamics values: Heart rate [Time frame: Before, immediately after MI-E interventions and after endotracheal suctioning.]
- Hemodynamics values: Mean arterial pressure [Time frame: Before, immediately after MI-E interventions and after endotracheal suctioning.]
- Gas exchange: Arterial blood gas analysis [Time frame: Before, immediately after endotracheal suctioning and 1 hour after interventions.]
- Gas exchange: Pulseoximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) [Time frame: Before, immediately after endotracheal suctioning and 1 hour after interventions.]
- Adverse events [Time frame: During the intervention/procedure and immediately after the intervention/procedure.]
- Numbers of participants with adverse events [Time frame: During the intervention/procedure and immediately after the intervention/procedure.]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adults (> 18yo).
- Endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48h and active humidification for > 24h.
- Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale -3 to -5.
- Signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with hemodynamic instability (MAP < 60 or > 110, Heart Rate < 50 or > 130, new onset arrhythmias), respiratory instability (PEEP > 12cmH2O, SpO2 < 90% or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) > 60%).
- Undrained pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum.
- Unstable intracranial pressure (ICP > 20mmHg or MAP < 60).
- Severe bronchospasm.
- Post cardiothoracic surgical patients.
- Active pulmonary tuberculosis.
- Bronchoesophageal or bronchopleural fistulas.
- Prone position.
- Pregnancy.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Spain · 1 center
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona — Barcelona
Publications
- Konrad F, Schreiber T, Brecht-Kraus D, Georgieff M. Mucociliary transport in ICU patients. Chest. 1994 Jan;105(1):237-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.237. PMID 8275739
- Sackner MA, Hirsch J, Epstein S. Effect of cuffed endotracheal tubes on tracheal mucous velocity. Chest. 1975 Dec;68(6):774-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.68.6.774. PMID 1192854
- Gal TJ. Effects of endotracheal intubation on normal cough performance. Anesthesiology. 1980 Apr;52(4):324-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198004000-00008. PMID 7362053
- Kilgour E, Rankin N, Ryan S, Pack R. Mucociliary function deteriorates in the clinical range of inspired air temperature and humidity. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1491-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2235-3. Epub 2004 Mar 16. PMID 15024566
- American Association for Respiratory Care; Restrepo RD, Walsh BK. Humidification during invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation: 2012. Respir Care. 2012 May;57(5):782-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01766. PMID 22546299
- Li Bassi G, Zanella A, Cressoni M, Stylianou M, Kolobow T. Following tracheal intubation, mucus flow is reversed in the semirecumbent position: possible role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):518-25. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000299741.32078.E9. PMID 18176317
- Wu MF, Wang TY, Chen DS, Hsiao HF, Hu HC, Chung FT, Lin TY, Lin SM. The effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on lung function and complications in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 9;16(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01738-x. PMID 34886881
- Kuroiwa R, Tateishi Y, Oshima T, Inagaki T, Furukawa S, Takemura R, Kawasaki Y, Murata A. Mechanical Insufflation-exsufflation for the Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan;25(1):62-66. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23508. PMID 33603304
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06491017 · HCB/2023/1101