Menu
Recruiting NCT06485869

Impact of Virtual Reality on the Quality of Life of Oncology Patients

No phase Interventional Cancer

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Measure the improvement in quality of life, Measure the level of satisfaction of patients and nursing staff, Measurement of anxiety and pain, Measurement of depressive state.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Cancer. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Anxiety, nausea and vomiting are common side effects in paediatric patients receiving chemotherapy. chemotherapy. New evidence supports the efficacy of immersive virtual reality in improving symptoms of anxiety and distress, including nausea and vomiting, in this vulnerable group. This research will evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality in managing anxiety, nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving their first line of chemotherapy and will also measure the quality of life of these patients and evaluate patient and nursing staff satisfaction

Detailed description

For cancer patients, virtual reality proved more effective than other forms of distraction in relieving anxiety, depression and fatigue during chemotherapy. Although pain and anxiety in cancer patients are managed proactively, this study was designed to measure the quality of life of these patients, assess patient and carer satisfaction, evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality in reducing anxiety during the first three sessions of chemotherapy, and assess the impact of virtual reality on preventive and acute chemotherapy-induced fatigue, nausea and vomiting.

This is a clinical study with a therapeutic aim using a non-medicinal, interventional, prospective, multi-centre, controlled and randomised technique, with two parallel groups. It is clinical research involving the human person category 2, involving only minimal risks and constraints. The two arms are Arm A: study questionnaires with virtual reality (VR) Arm B: study questionnaires without virtual reality, standard care (SC)

A visit will be made during the 3 cycles of chemotherapy during which arm A will be immersed in Virtual Reality with the Healthy Mind VR programme.

programme, and patients in arm B will receive standard care without hypnotic support.

There will also be a pre-inclusion visit 7 days before the first cycle. and visits at 3, 6 and 9 months after the 3 cycles of chemotherapy.

Interventions

  • Other Measure the improvement in quality of life
    Improvment of quality of life is measured by the QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire
  • Other Measure the level of satisfaction of patients and nursing staff
    Patient satisfaction is measured using a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction.
  • Other Measurement of anxiety and pain
    Anxiety and pain is measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This measurement is complemented by physiological responses to anxiety, measured by heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (HR and BP)
  • Other Measurement of depressive state
    Depressive State is measured by HAD score
  • Other measuring fatigue levels
    Fatigue levels is measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
  • Other measurement of acute nausea and vomiting
    acute nausea and vomiting is measured by MASCC Antiemesis Tool (MAT)

Primary outcome measures

  • QLQ-C30 [Time frame: at the start of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days); 3,6,9 months post chemo, at the beginning of the 3rd month post chemo, at the beginning of the 6th month post chemo and at the beginning of the 9th month post chemo]
  • Measuring patient and nurse satisfaction with the chemotherapy procedure [Time frame: after the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1 and 3 (each cycle lasts 28 days)]
  • MAT [Time frame: after the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 2 and 3 (each cycle lasts 28 days)]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • VAS Score [Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days).]
  • Heart rate [Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days).]
  • Blood pressure [Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1, 2 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days).]
  • HAD Score [Time frame: Before the start of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1 (each cycle is 28 days) and after the end of the first chemotherapy session on day 1 of cycle 1 and 2 (each cycle is 28 days).]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Chemotherapy-naive patient
  • Patient with first-line indication for intravenous cyclic chemotherapy
  • Affiliated to a social security system
  • Having received full information on the organization of the research and having given free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator
  • Patient understands French or English
  • Expected duration of chemotherapy session for the first 3 cycles greater than 30 minutes

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient with communication disorders preventing informed consent
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)
  • Patients suffering from epilepsy
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment preventing use of headphones
  • Psychiatric pathologies such as delusional disorders, hallucinations or schizophrenia.
  • Patients with infections or facial wounds
  • Patients with severe claustrophobia
  • Patients with pacemakers
  • Patients with known cognitive or learning problems,
  • Patients with brain tumors or metastases,
  • Patients suffering from motion sickness
  • Expected duration of chemotherapy session for the first 3 cycles of 30 minutes or less.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

France · 2 centers
  • Centre Hospitalier de Chauny — Chauny
  • Centre Hospitalier de Saint Quentin — Saint-Quentin

Publications

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PMID 33538338
  • Colonna M, Boussari O, Cowppli-Bony A, Delafosse P, Romain G, Grosclaude P, Jooste V; French Network of Cancer Registries (FRANCIM). Time trends and short term projections of cancer prevalence in France. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;56:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 17. PMID 30125884
  • Carnio S, Galetta D, Scotti V, Cortinovis DL, Antonuzzo A, Pisconti S, Rossi A, Martelli O, Cecere FL, Lunghi A, Del Conte A, Montagna ES, Topulli J, Pelizzoni D, Rapetti SG, Gianetta M, Pacchiana MV, Pegoraro V, Cataldo N, Bria E, Novello S. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with advanced lung cancer during the first-line treatment: assessment by physicians, nurses, and PMID 29270827
  • Schneider SM, Workman ML. Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2(2):125-34. doi: 10.1089/cpb.1999.2.125. PMID 19178248
  • Chan A, Kim HK, Hsieh RK, Yu S, de Lima Lopes G Jr, Su WC, Banos A, Bhatia S, Burke TA, Keefe DM. Incidence and predictors of anticipatory nausea and vomiting in Asia Pacific clinical practice--a longitudinal analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2375-0. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PMID 25112561
  • Molassiotis A, Lee PH, Burke TA, Dicato M, Gascon P, Roila F, Aapro M. Anticipatory Nausea, Risk Factors, and Its Impact on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Results From the Pan European Emesis Registry Study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.317. Epub 2016 Feb 16. PMID 26891606
  • Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, Kirshner JJ, Hynes HE, Rosenbluth RJ. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in the era of 5-HT3 antiemetics. Support Care Cancer. 1998 May;6(3):244-7. doi: 10.1007/s005200050161. PMID 9629877
  • Dupuis LL, Sung L, Molassiotis A, Orsey AD, Tissing W, van de Wetering M. 2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: Prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):323-331. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3384-y. Epub 2016 Aug 26. PMID 27565788

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06485869 · 2023-A01543-42

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗