Menu
Recruiting NCT06483074

Empagliflozin on Residual Kidney Function in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Phase II Interventional End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis Peritoneal Dialysis Complication Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Residual Kidney Function

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Empagliflozin 10 MG.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis Complication, Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor, Residual Kidney Function. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Empagliflozin on Residual Kidney Function in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Empagliflozin, a new class of diabetes medication, has demonstrated a reduction in renal function decline among patients with chronic kidney disease, regardless of their diabetes status. However, all previous studies excluded dialysis patients. Patients starting dialysis may still produce a certain amount of urine. Importantly, patients with better preserved residual kidney function tend to have better control of blood pressure and volume status, improved nutrition status, higher quality of life and reduced mortality rate. The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety of empagliflozin in patients on peritoneal dialysis, in preparation for a future large clinical trial. Participants who newly initiate peritoneal dialysis will be randomly allocated to either empagliflozin on top of standard of care, or standard of care alone. Over a follow-up period of six months, the investigators will collect information on urine volume, blood pressure and glucose control. Safety, tolerability and drug compliance of empagliflozin will also be evaluated. If empagliflozin is found to be safe and well tolerated in patients on peritoneal dialysis, further large-scale randomized controlled trial may be conducted to evaluate its impact on residual kidney function and other relevant clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

Diabetes is the leading cause of end stage kidney disease in developed countries. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based and cost-effective modality of kidney placement therapy. Maintenance of residual kidney function (RKF) is one of the most crucial objectives to improve outcomes of PD patients. Observational studies showed that residual urine volume or residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but not peritoneal creatinine clearance, independently predicted patient survival. This benefit is likely attributed to better volume control, improved nutritional status, preserved endocrine function and enhanced clearance of uremic toxins in the presence of RKF. However, current therapeutic strategies to preserve RKF were most limited to the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and biocompatible PD solutions.

Hong Kong adopted the 'PD-first' policy since 1985, and has the highest proportion of PD patients in the world. Inadequate dialysis, which is directly related to the loss of RKF, is the second most common reason for a permanent transfer to hemodialysis among PD patients. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce albuminuria and delay progression of chronic kidney disease even in patients with advanced stages of kidney disease. It is postulated that the renoprotective effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors may be extended to dialysis population since a considerable proportion of patients still have urine output. SGLT2 inhibitors may potentially attenuate GFR decline in PD patients because heavy proteinuria independently predicted decline in residual GFR and onset of anuria. Moreover, preclinical studies suggested that empagliflozin reduced inflammation and oxidative stress by decreasing proinflammatory cytokines, inducing expression of anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype of macrophages, and antagonizing the effect of advanced glycation products. This beneficial effect may be particularly relevant to PD patients, where subclinical inflammation is common and inversely correlated with RKF.

Despite the potential promising effect of SGLT2-inhibitors in RKF in PD patients, dialysis patients were excluded in previous randomized controlled trials. In the present study, the investigators hypothesize that oral empagliflozin in addition to RAAS inhibitor, compared to RAAS inhibitor alone, better preserves RKF in patients newly started on PD. After a run-in period of 6 to 8 weeks where the dose of RAAS inhibitors are uptitrated to maximally tolerated dose, 48 incident PD patients will be randomized to empagliflozin or control (no empagliflozin) for a total of 6 months. This study aims to explore the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, adequately powered randomized controlled trial that investigates the effect of empagliflozin on RKF in incident PD patients.

Interventions

  • Drug Empagliflozin 10 MG
    empagliflozin oral 10mg daily for 6 months

Primary outcome measures

  • Recruitment rate [Time frame: During randomization]
  • Medication adherence [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Retention rate [Time frame: 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Slope of residual GFR [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Time to anuria [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Difference in residual urine volume [Time frame: Month 0, 2, 4, 6]
  • Difference in volume of overhydration [Time frame: Month 0, 2, 4, 6]
  • Difference in plasma N-terminal pro-brain type natriuretic peptide [Time frame: Month 0, 2, 4, 6]
  • Difference in systolic blood pressure [Time frame: Month 0, 2, 4, 6]
  • Difference in volume of ultrafiltration per day [Time frame: Month 0, 1, 2, 4, 6]
  • Incidence of urinary tract infection [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Incidence of genital tract infection [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Incidence of ketoacidosis [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Incidence of lower limb amputation [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Incidence of severe hypoglycemia [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Incident PD patients within 90 days of Tenckhoff catheter insertion
  • Age 18-75 years old
  • Patient with or without history of Type 2 diabetes
  • Residual GFR (defined as the average of 24-hour urinary urea and creatinine clearances) > 2ml/min/1.73m2 AND urine volume > 400ml per day
  • Patients who are willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with history of hemodialysis (≥ 3 months) or renal transplant
  • Life expectancy <6 months
  • Prior use of any type of SGLT2 inhibitors within 1 month before screening visit
  • Poorly controlled diabetes with HBA1c >11%
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • History of any active malignancy within 5 years (except curatively resected basal cell or squamous cell skin cancers)
  • Peritonitis within 4 weeks
  • Ketoacidosis within 5 years
  • Known hypersensitivity to empagliflozin or other SGLT2 inhibitors
  • Any active acute or chronic physical or mental conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the compliance of participants to or the performance of this study
  • Participation in any clinical trial or use of any investigational medicinal product 1 month before screening visit

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Hong Kong · 1 center
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06483074 · CREC 2024.090-T

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗