Menu
Recruiting NCT06471127

Neuroplasticity Biomarkers in Aphasia

No phase Interventional Aphasia Language Stroke

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Pseudoword learning paradigm task.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Aphasia, Language, Stroke. Basic parameters: 40 years — 90 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Genetic and MRI Biomarkers of Neuroplasticity Predict Aphasia Recovery and Phenotypes

Overview

Patients with stroke frequently suffer from aphasia, a disorder of expressive and/or receptive language, that can lead to serious health consequences, including social isolation, depression, reduced quality of life, and increased caregiver burden. Aphasia recovery varies greatly between individuals, and likely relies upon the capacity for neuroplasticity, both at a systems level of reorganized brain networks and a molecular level of neuronal repair and plasticity. The proposed work will evaluate genetic and neural network biological markers of neuroplasticity associated with variability in aphasia, with a future goal to improve prognostics and identify therapeutic targets to reduce the long-term burdens of aphasia.

Detailed description

Aphasia is an acquired neurologic language disorder that is among the most challenging long-term disabilities for stroke survivors, often leading to social isolation and reduced quality of life. Recovery from aphasia relies on plasticity in residual brain networks. However, neuroplasticity varies substantially across individuals, making the presence, severity, and phenotype of language impairments challenging to predict. A vital step toward post-stroke precision medicine is identifying neuroplasticity-related biological markers that can improve prognostic models and targeted neurorehabilitation therapies for people with aphasia. The proposed research will test the central hypothesis that individual differences in neuroplasticity, measured through genetic polymorphisms and longitudinal neuroimaging connectivity biomarkers, will account for significant variance in post-stroke aphasia recovery. This 5-year project will include three specific aims. Aim 1 is to index spontaneous recovery by determining relationships between genetic biomarkers of plasticity, longitudinal neural network connectivity, and changes in language during sub-acute to chronic stroke recovery. Aim 2 is to identify genetic and MRI biomarkers predictive of chronic post-stroke aphasia severity and phenotypes. Aim 3 is to characterize genetic and MRI biomarkers associated with verbal learning variability in chronic aphasia. These data will support the development of a larger, multi-site R01 study to examine interactions between multiple biomarkers of neuroplasticity that inform longitudinal aphasia prognostics and treatment efficacy.

Interventions

  • Behavioral Pseudoword learning paradigm task
    Pseudoword learning is an experimental learning task by which participants view two novel objects (a target and a foil) and simultaneously hear an audio recording of the pseudoword name of one of the two objects. Participants must choose (via mouse click) which object corresponds to the word presented, immediately after which feedback is provided.

Primary outcome measures

  • Aphasia presence/severity [Time frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year post-stroke]
  • Semantic processing [Time frame: At least 1 year post-stroke]
  • Phonological processing [Time frame: At least 1 year post-stroke]
  • Noun processing [Time frame: At least 1 year post-stroke]
  • Verb processing [Time frame: At least 1 year post-stroke]
  • Pseudoword learning [Time frame: At least 1 year post-stroke]
  • Verbal learning [Time frame: At least 1 year post-stroke]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM) Score [Time frame: 1 year post-stroke]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 40-90
  • Right-handed (prior to stroke)
  • Proficient English speakers
  • History of a single ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory that is lateralized to the left or right (Aim 1) cerebral hemisphere.
  • Presence of aphasia (Aims 2-3)
  • Capacity to understand the nature of the study and provide informed consent
  • Acute or subacute stroke at the time of Aim 1 enrollment; Stroke #12 months old (chronic) at the time of Aims 2-3 enrollment
  • Medically stable

Exclusion criteria

  • History of significant medical or neurological disorder (other than stroke)
  • History of significant or poorly controlled psychiatric disorders
  • Current abuse of alcohol or drugs, prescription or otherwise
  • Clinically significant and uncorrected vision or hearing loss
  • Anything other than standard of care stroke treatment such as Plavix, aspirin (81-300 mg daily), beta-blockers, diabetes medications or choles- terol-lowering agents, thrombolytics (e.g., tPA), anticoagulation agents such as Heparin, Warfarin/Coumadin

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Other

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • UW School of Medicine and Public Health — Madison

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06471127 · 2023-1101 · 1K23DC021744 · A481800 · L&S/COMMUN SCI & DISORDERS · Protocol Version 6/18/2026

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗