Menu
Recruiting NCT06467747

The Efficacy of Music on Perioperative Pain Management

No phase Interventional Perioperative Pain Management

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Music, Mute.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Perioperative Pain Management. Basic parameters: 20 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Taiwan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

The Efficacy of Intraoperative Music Stimulation on Perioperative Pain Management

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if intraoperative music stimulation works to alleviate perioperative pain in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia. It will also learn about the possible mechanisms by how music affects pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does music lower the number of times participants need to use a rescue analgesic? What changes occur in electroencephalogram (EEG) and nociception monitors when participants listen to music? Researchers will compare music to mute or control (hear ambient sounds without earphones) to see if music works to alleviate perioperative pain. Participants will listen music or mute or ambient sounds throughout the operation, and receive routine anesthesia care.

Interventions

  • Other Music
    Music group: wear earphones to listen to music and receive standardized anesthesia protocol
  • Other Mute
    Mute group: wear earphones without music and receive standardized anesthesia protocol

Primary outcome measures

  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) [Time frame: 1. While in the post-anesthesia care unit, for an average of 1 hour. 2. 24 hours after surgery.]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Analgesic-frequency [Time frame: 1. During the operation. 2. While in the post-anesthesia care unit, for an average of 1 hour. 3. 24 hours after surgery.]
  • Analgesic-total amount [Time frame: 1. During the operation. 2. While in the post-anesthesia care unit, for an average of 1 hour. 3. 24 hours after surgery.]
  • Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) [Time frame: 1. While in the post-anesthesia care unit, for an average of 1 hour.]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Older than 20 years old and younger than 80 years old
  • male or female
  • Scheduled for minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy)
  • Ambulatory surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I\~III

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe hearing impairment
  • Severe pulmonary or cardiovascular disease
  • Brain or central nervous system (CNS) disorder
  • Long-term systemic steroid or daily morphine treatment
  • Pregnant women
  • Emergency surgery
  • The absence of informed consent

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Taiwan · 1 center
  • Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation — Taichung

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06467747 · REC113-11

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗