Menu
Recruiting NCT06459388

Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization vs Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Stroke Patients

No phase Interventional Stroke, Ischemic

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Stabilizing Reversals and Rhythmic Stabilization, Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke, Ischemic. Basic parameters: 40 years — 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Pakistan
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Effects of Stabilizing Reversal and Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Trunk Control, Postural Stability and Mobility in Stroke Patients

Overview

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patients? Researchers will compare stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization to pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation to see if there any difference in effects of stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization versus pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control, postural stability and mobility in stroke patient. Participants will be divided into two groups: Group A will receive stabilizing reversals and rhythmic reversals technique. The patient will perform 3 sets with 15 repetitions in each session, 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Group B will receive Pelvic PNF protocol. The treatment protocol will be followed 5 days a week for 8 weeks (i.e. 20 sessions) and each session will last for 30 minutes.

Detailed description

It will be a randomized clinical trial study in which non-probability convenience sampling will be used. The sample size will be 50. The participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be divided randomly into two groups through computerized table generator method of randomization. Baseline assessment of both groups will be done before the execution of interventions. Group A will receive stabilizing reversal and rhythmic stabilization protocols for 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Group B will receive pelvic PNF protocol 5 days per week for 8 weeks. Trunk Impairment scale will be used to assess trunk control, Postural assessment Scale and Functional Reach Test will be used to assess postural stability and Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment will measure the mobility at the baseline, at 4 weeks and after the completion of intervention at 8 weeks to find out the outcome measures of the participants. The data will be analyzed using SPSS version 24. Normality of data will be assessed through Kolmogorov-smirnov test. Difference between preintervention, mid-intervention and post-intervention readings will be calculated using repeated measure ANOVA for parametric data. For non-parametric data Kruskal Wallis test will be used. For between group analysis Independent sample t test will be used for parametric data and Mann Whitney test will be used for non-parametric data.

Interventions

  • Other Stabilizing Reversals and Rhythmic Stabilization
    3 sets with 15 repetitions in each session, 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
  • Other Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
    The treatment protocol will be followed 5 days a week for 8 weeks (i.e. 20 sessions) and each session will last for 30 minutes.

Primary outcome measures

  • Trunk Impairment Scale [Time frame: 0 week, 4th week, 8th week]
  • Postural Assessment Scale [Time frame: 0 week, 4th week, 8th week]
  • Functional Reach Test [Time frame: 0 week, 4th week, 8th week]
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment [Time frame: 0 week, 4th week, 8th week]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed cases of ischemic stroke.
  • Both genders of stroke patients.
  • Age of stroke patients between 40-65 years.
  • Duration of stroke less than 6 months.
  • Participants should be able to understand and follow simple verbal commands (MMSE
  • 24).

Exclusion criteria

  • Recurrent history of stroke.
  • Recent history of any trauma.
  • Musculoskeletal disorders such as low back pain, arthritis, degenerative diseases of the lower limbs affecting motor performance, spinal deformity and contractures.
  • Spasticity (modified Ashworth scale grade ≥3) or flaccidity in lower limbs and upper limbs.
  • PNF treatment given to the pelvic region within 6 weeks.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Pakistan · 1 center
  • Lahore General Hospital — Lahore

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06459388 · REC/RCR & AHS/23/0276

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗