Menu
Recruiting NCT06454617

Calibr-Ì: Comparative Evaluation of Phantomless Calibration Methods to Quantify Bone Mineral Density for Opportunistic Analysis of CT Scans

Observational Osteoporosis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Phantom.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Osteoporosis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Italy, New Zealand
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparative Evaluation of Phantomless Calibration Methods to Quantify Bone Mineral Density for Opportunistic Analysis of CT Scans

Overview

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) and qualitative alteration of the skeleton, resulting in increased bone fragility and fracture risk. The epidemiological impact of osteoporosis is extremely high. Proper diagnosis and clinical management of osteoporosis are critical to reducing the incidence of fragility fractures and preventing their complications. The diagnosis is generally confirmed by instrumental analysis of bone mineral density. The standard method is X-ray bone densitometry (DXA), which allows diagnosis based on criteria defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) by virtue of the T-score. DXA is a relatively quick and inexpensive examination with low exposure to ionizing radiation. However, this method has limitations in detecting fracture risk, and in addition, not all patients are properly referred for DXA services, which, among other things, require specific criteria to be reimbursed by the National Health System. Currently, computed tomography (CT) scanning is the most widely used three-dimensional diagnostic modality in clinical practice, and the number of investigations performed in high-income countries is continuously growing. Quantitative assessment of bone mineral density by CT is possible by proper calibration of the machine for the purpose of converting the CT numbers (or Hounsfield units) measured by the scanner into BMD units.

Interventions

  • Other Phantom
    The patients will be simultaneously scanned with a QCT phantom

Primary outcome measures

  • Comparison of different internal calibration methods [Time frame: At baseline (Day 0)]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Definition of performance of internal calibration methods [Time frame: At baseline (Day 0)]
  • Optimization of existing internal calibration methods [Time frame: Through study completion, up to 2 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Both sexes.
  • All ethnicities.
  • Age equal or above 18 years.
  • Any clinical indication (no specific pathology is required) for a CT scan of the lumbosacral spine or abdomen in which the entire lumbar spine (L1 to L5), paravertebral muscles, abdominal aorta, and subcutaneous adipose tissue are visible.
  • Ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • General contraindications to CT examination, including pregnancy or body weight/size exceeding scanner limits.
  • Severe degenerative manifestations of the lumbosacral spine.
  • Severe scoliosis of the lumbosacral spine.
  • Surgical hardware that prevents adequate CT scanning.
  • Oncologic pathology in progress or in recent history.
  • Any other situation deemed incompatible with the study by the designated physician or investigator.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

Italy · 1 center
  • The Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute — Bologna
New Zealand · 1 center
  • Auckland Hospital - Greenlane Clinical Centre - National Women's Hospital — Auckland

Publications

  • Rossini M, Adami S, Bertoldo F, Diacinti D, Gatti D, Giannini S, Giusti A, Malavolta N, Minisola S, Osella G, Pedrazzoni M, Sinigaglia L, Viapiana O, Isaia GC. Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of osteoporosis. Reumatismo. 2016 Jun 23;68(1):1-39. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2016.870. PMID 27339372
  • Willers C, Norton N, Harvey NC, Jacobson T, Johansson H, Lorentzon M, McCloskey EV, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA; SCOPE review panel of the IOF. Osteoporosis in Europe: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Jan 26;17(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00969-8. PMID 35079919
  • Engelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, Qin L, Zysset P, Leslie WD, Shepherd JA, Shousboe JT. Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Advanced Techniques in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part III. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):393-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.010. PMID 26277853
  • Michalski AS, Besler BA, Michalak GJ, Boyd SK. CT-based internal density calibration for opportunistic skeletal assessment using abdominal CT scans. Med Eng Phys. 2020 Apr;78:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Feb 12. PMID 32059948

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06454617 · Calibr-I

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗