Access to Genetic Testing in Underserved Patients With Cancer
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Best Practice, Educational Intervention, Electronic Health Record Review, Genetic Counseling.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Breast Carcinoma, Male Breast Carcinoma, Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Increasing Access to Genetic Testing in Underserved Patients Using a Multilingual Conversational Agent
Overview
This study compares the experiences of people who receive information about genetic testing from a computer-generated character to patients who receive information from a human genetics healthcare provider. Patients with cancer are increasingly recommended for genetic testing as standard of care. Multiple factors contribute to low usage of genetic testing but for many patients the lack of access to genetic counseling and testing is an important and flexible factor. Lack of access is especially relevant to racial/ethnic minority patients and those living in non-metropolitan rural settings who are frequently cared for at safety-net hospitals with limited genetics services. Alternative delivery models are necessary to improve rates of access to genetic testing in patients with cancer. Health information technology is under used by genetics providers. A patient-facing relational agent (PERLA) will provide pre-test genetics education in both English and Spanish across two clinical settings to facilitate more timely access to genetic testing. Using the PERLA intervention may help researchers learn different ways to provide education about genetic testing to patients with cancer compared to usual care.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To obtain patient and provider input on the optimal content and format of a new relational agent (RA) intervention ("PERLA") for automated pre-test genetics education.
II. To obtain patient feedback on the usability of the English- and Spanish-language PERLAs.
III. To determine the acceptability of the newly designed English- and Spanish-language PERLAs among patients with cancer.
IV. To evaluate the impact of the English- and Spanish-language PERLAs on the proportion of patients who meet cancer-based genetic testing guidelines who receive genetic test results within 3 months of initiating cancer care.
V. To evaluate the potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of PERLA in the clinical setting.
OUTLINE:
DEVELOPMENT PHASE: Participants attend focus groups and provide feedback on the content, format, and usability of the PERLAs to enable to tailor the design of the intervention.
USABILITY PHASE: Participants attend usability testing and provide feedback through cognitive interviews.
PILOT TESTING PHASE: Participants evaluate the newly developed PERLAs and provide feedback through focused interviews and structured assessment.
INTERVENTION PHASE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive access to PERLA comprising pre-test genetics education and standard post-test provider-based genetic counseling over 20-60 minutes.
ARM B: Patients receive access to usual care pre- and post-test provider-based genetic counseling.
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE: Participants complete qualitative interviews to evaluate potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of PERLA in the clinic.
After completion of study intervention, patients are followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months.
Interventions
- Other Best Practice
Receive provider-based genetic counseling - Other Educational Intervention
Receive genetics education - Other Electronic Health Record Review
Ancillary studies - Other Genetic Counseling
Receive provider-based genetic counseling - Other Interview
Ancillary studies - Other Survey Administration
Ancillary studies
Primary outcome measures
- Proportion of participants who receive genetic testing [Time frame: Up to 3 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
- Patient-reported outcomes [Time frame: Up to 3 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Age > 18 years old
- Diagnosed with least one of the following:
- Epithelial ovarian cancer
- Exocrine pancreatic cancer
- Metastatic or high or very high-risk prostate cancer
- Breast cancer at or before age 50
- Bilateral breast cancer
- Triple negative breast cancer
- Male breast cancer OR
- Healthcare provider who treats patients with any of the above types of cancer
- Able to read and write in English or Spanish
- Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Patients who cannot provide informed consent
- Patients who cannot see, read, or write
- Patients who have the cancer and clinical characteristics defined in the inclusion criteria, but who do not speak English or Spanish
- Patients with none of the listed cancer diagnoses and clinical characteristics
- Healthcare provider who do not treats cancer patients
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
Study locations
United States · 2 centers
- USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center — Los Angeles
- University of Rochester — Rochester
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06422455 · 19PS-24-3 · NCI-2024-02187 · 19PS-24-3 · P30CA014089 · R01CA263532