Menu
Recruiting NCT06406569

A Qualitative and Usability Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Home Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Post-stroke

No phase Interventional Stroke

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: H-Man Robot, ReHandyBot, MyoPanda.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Stroke. Basic parameters: 21 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Singapore
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Home RehabGym: a Qualitative and Usability Evaluation of Advanced Technologies for Home Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation Post-stroke

Overview

Due to limited resources such as the low therapist to patient ratio or high costs associated to rehabilitation therapy, providing higher therapy dose to patients after discharge is highly challenging. This often results in non-use of the impaired limb as a result of the decreased therapy dose, causing partial loss of the functional improvements previously gained during early rehabilitation. In this study, the investigators plan to pilot the HomeRehab Gym concept via the deployment of three rehabilitation devices at patients' homes: MyoPanda, H-Man and ReHandyBot.

Detailed description

Previous research has proven that technology-aided upper limb rehabilitation is non-inferior in terms of feasibility and efficacy when compared to conventional therapy in stroke patients. These rehabilitation devices can be set up as a 'rehabilitation gym' (RehabGym), where patients can interact with several devices that target different body and rehabilitation domains and, thus allows for a holistic and complementary therapy.

Despite recent studies having shown that training with a RehabGym under reduced supervision in a hospital is not only feasible but also equally beneficial in terms of clinical outcomes, however, a RehabGym has never been set up at a patient's home to the best of our knowledge.

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of a RehabGym at home concept using three different upper-limb technologies (H-Man, ReHandyBot, MyoPanda) that are established, clinically tested and allow for on-demand therapy. Objective measures of clinical efficacy will also be examined, and cost-analysis to determine the economic feasibility of a commercial implementation of RehabGym at home in the future will be performed.

Interventions

  • Device H-Man Robot
    The HMAN is certified as a CE class 2A upper limb rehabilitation robot suitable for hospital, clinic and home-based use in 2020 by Health Sciences Authority, Singapore. It has since been employed in post-stroke neurorehabilitation therapy and assessment of sensorimotor functions in stroke patients.
  • Device ReHandyBot
    ReHandyBot is the portable version of ReHapticKnob a robot developed at ETH Zurich that provides neurocognitive therapy, focusing on hand opening and closing movements as well as prono-supination of the forearm.
  • Device MyoPanda
    MyoPanda is a passive wrist/hand device which patients use to train the hand and wrist function by controlling a virtual avatar with EMG activity measures.

Primary outcome measures

  • Compliance Rates [Time frame: Through study's data collection period, up to 2 years.]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Fugl Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 3 (mid-intervention assessment), 6 (post-intervention assessment), 12 (1st follow-up assessment), 24 (last follow-up assessment)]
  • Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 3 (mid-intervention assessment), 6 (post-intervention assessment), 12 (1st follow-up assessment), 24 (last follow-up assessment)]
  • System Usability Scale (SUS) [Time frame: Weeks 3 (mid-intervention assessment), 6 (post-intervention assessment))]
  • Hr-QOL scales using SS-QOL (Stroke specific Quality of Life scale) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 6 (post-intervention assessment), 12 (1st follow-up assessment), 24 (last follow-up assessment)]
  • Box and Block Test (BBT) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), 3 (mid-intervention assessment), 6 (post-intervention assessment), 12 (1st follow-up assessment), 24 (last follow-up assessment)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) confirmed by admitting doctors and CT, CT angiography or MRI brain imaging
  • Age 21 to 80 years, both males and females
  • At least 28 days post-stroke
  • Upper limb motor impairment of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale 20 to 50
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) > 21/30
  • Ability to sit supported and continuously for 60 minutes
  • Stable home abode with enough space to place technologies
  • Has a carer/next of kin to supervise home-based exercises

Exclusion criteria

  • Functional impairment of the upper limb due to other pathologies
  • Medical conditions incompatible with research participation: uncontrolled medical illnesses (hypertension or diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, bronchial asthma, severe /untreated depression, agitation, end stage renal/liver/heart/lung failure, unresolved cancers)
  • Anticipated life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Pacemakers and other active implants
  • Active seizures within 3 months
  • Local factors potentially worsened by intensive technology-aided upper-limb therapy and computer-based training:
  • Spasticity - modified Ashworth Scale MAS > 2 of any upper limb muscle groups
  • Severe pain in affected arm - Visual Analogue Scale for pain VAS > 5/10
  • Skin wounds
  • Cognitive impairment precluding study participation
  • Severe visual impairment or visual neglect affecting ability to use technologies
  • History of dementia, depression or behavioural problems
  • Pregnant or lactating females will not be allowed to participate

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Singapore · 1 center
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital — Singapore

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06406569 · DSRB 2023/00527

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗