Menu
Recruiting NCT06386835

Collagen Paste vs Mucosal Advancement Flap for FIA

No phase Interventional Fistula-in-ano

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Collagen Paste, Mucosal advancement.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Fistula-in-ano. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Collagen Paste Injection Compared With Mucosal Advancement Flap for the Treatment of Fistula-in-ano: Single Centre Non-inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview

The treatment for fistula-in-ano (FIA) remains a challenge to General and Colorectal Surgeons Worldwide. A variety of surgical treatments have been described for high anal fistulas, but none offers the panacea of fistula eradication with guaranteed preservation of continence. This study compares Collagen paste injection to mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of fistula-in-ano.

Detailed description

Rectal advancement flaps have been advocated as a means of closing high fistulas with preservation of the external sphincter muscle. With this technique, it shows promising results with success rate of approximately 60%. However, complications have been reported, in particular with a change of continence in 30-35% of patients.

Collagen paste is a novel sphincter-preserving method for fistula closure. Permacol (Medtronic, USA) is a sterile acellular cross-linked porcine dermal collagen matrix suspension. The paste-like suspension form a matrix that accelerates neovascularization, cellular infiltration which promotes healing and fistula closure. The theoretical benefits of paste form compared to previous collagen plug design is that the collagen can moulded into the fistula cavity or tract. This allows better tissue contact with the collagen thus improves healing and reduces the chance of dislodgement. Limited data is available to date. Success rates of collagen paste range from 47.6% to 63%. Hence it has a potential to be the first-line treatment for high FIA with low complication rates and without causing disruption to the anal sphincter complex.

Interventions

  • Procedure Collagen Paste
    Collagen paste injection
  • Procedure Mucosal advancement
    Mucosal advancement flap

Primary outcome measures

  • Clinical healing of Fistula-in-ano [Time frame: 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • 30-day morbidity [Time frame: 30 days]
  • Quality of life score [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Postoperative pain score [Time frame: 1 week]
  • Faecal incontinence rate [Time frame: 1 year]
  • Hospital readmission rate [Time frame: 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of high cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano.
  • Patients must have undergone a prior EUA to characterise the nature of the fistula.
  • The fistula tract should be ≥ 2 cm in length.
  • Only a single internal fistula opening should be present at EUA, such that the fistula is suitable for treatment by insertion of a seton drain.
  • Patients must have been treated with a draining seton for a minimum period of 6 weeks prior to randomisation.
  • Patients must be aged ≥ 18 years and able to provide informed consent.
  • Fistulas must be of cryptoglandular aetiology.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent.
  • Contraindication to general anaesthesia or spinal anaesthesia.
  • Low trans-sphincteric fistulas.
  • Non-cryptoglandular fistulas (e.g. Crohn's disease, obstetric, irradiation, malignant, etc.).
  • Other perineal fistulas (e.g. rectovaginal fistulas, pouch-vaginal fistulas, etc.).
  • Complex disease in which more than one internal fistula opening is present and requiring concurrent insertion of more than one fistula plug.
  • Clinical evidence of active perianal sepsis. In the event that there is disagreement between clinical and radiological assessment of active sepsis/collection, the clinical opinion will prevail.
  • Cultural or religious objection to the use of pig tissue.
  • Absolute contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (e.g. cardiac pacemaker).
  • Patients with recurrent anal fistulas previously treated with a fistula plug.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Hong Kong · 2 centers
  • Department of Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong — Shatin
  • Prince of Wlaes Hospital — Shatin

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06386835 · CREC2021.724-T

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗