Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Pacing Post-CABG Surgery in Patients With HFrEF
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Atrial pacing with respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) variability, Monotonic right atrial overdrive pacing.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Basic parameters: from 22 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Australia, New Zealand
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to test a new type of pacemaker in heart failure patients following a heart bypass operation. The new pacemaker restores respiratory sinus arrhythmia which is a natural pattern where the heart rate increases when the participants breathe in and slows down when participants breathe out. The main questions the trial aims to answer are: * Is the new type of pacemaker safe? * Does the new type of pacemaker improve how patients' hearts work (also known as cardiac output)? Participants will have a range of tests before their operation and during their recovery in hospital while participants have the new type of pacemaker in place, and will be monitored very closely. Participants will also receive a phone call 1 month after their surgery. Researchers will compare the new type of heart pacing against standard treatment to see if it is as safe, and if it is any better for patients.
Detailed description
This is a first-in-human (FIH) clinical investigation of a modification of an existing medical device. It will be a comparative, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. RSA modulated atrial pacing will be compared against monotonic atrial pacing in patients with HFrEF who have had CABG surgery.
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to explore the risk/benefit profile of the use of RSA pacing in patients with HFrEF following CABG. Based on the prior animal models the investigators hypothesise an improvement in cardiac function over several days of RSA pacing, with no increase in risk compared to typical pacemaker use.
Primary hypothesis - Atrial pacing with additional RSA variability (for up to 10 days) is feasible and safe in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The primary outcome is measuring arrhythmia episodes.
Secondary hypothesis - Atrial pacing with additional RSA variability improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction following CABG surgery. The secondary outcomes is measuring cardiac function, cardiac output, apnoea episodes.
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is part of normal physiology and RSA pacing is looking to restore this. In heart failure, RSA is severely reduced. Therefore the investigators have identified that, post-CABG surgery patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction are the ideal candidates for this study. Following surgery it is standard of care for a surgeon to leave temporary pacing wires attached to the heart as a precaution and it is not uncommon to leave them in for 10 days or longer. Hence, these temporary wires can be used to deliver RSA pacing. Adjusting pacing rates is common in both implanted or temporary pacemakers.
Potential patients awaiting CABG surgery with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction will be identified using two routes - inpatients and outpatients.
The investigators would randomly allocate patients to either the RSA external pacemaker box or the normal external pacemaker for a maximum of 10 days. Patients will be connected to nasal prongs to monitor their respiration and in the RSA group, this signal will be fed to the external pacemaker to deliver RSA pacing.
Interventions
- Device Atrial pacing with respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) variability
The intervention in this study is a modification of the pacing output from a standard external pacemaker such that it will approximate the RSA variation found in healthy subjects. A pacemaker (PACE204, Osypka Medical AG), similar to those currently in common use in post-CABG patients, will be adapted to receive an additional input signal based on the respiratory signal (Ceryx device). The respiration signal will be combined with the ECG signal to determine the appropriate pacing interval. The pa - Device Monotonic right atrial overdrive pacing
Pacing is delivered by a PACE204 pacemaker (Osypka Medical AG) delivering standard monotonic right atrial pacing
Primary outcome measures
- Number of arrhythmia episodes per patient during pacing [Time frame: Up to 10 days]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Adult patients (≥ 22 years) selected for isolated, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
- Established diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Elective or urgent admission routes
- Echocardiography assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 20%-40% (within 1 month of planned surgery)
- Sinus rhythm
- Any number of coronary vessels replaced. Must include left anterior descending artery.
- Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Requirement for concurrent valve replacement surgery.
- Off-pump CABG.
- Emergency CABG
- History of paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation or flutter
- History of atrioventricular-node dependent tachycardia
- Patients lacking capacity to consent
- Patient testing positive for Covid-19 within 14 days of intended CABG (PCR or lateral flow test)
- Intrinsic resting heart rate > 100bpm
- Pregnancy
- Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
- Failure to obtain Uscom signals
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Australia · 2 centers
- Royal Adelaide Hospital — Adelaide
- Monash Health — Melbourne
New Zealand · 1 center
- Waikato Hospital — Hamilton
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06384963 · Cer22/02