Evaluation of Performance, Safety and Benefit of the Wishbone HA as Bone Graft Substitute, a Pre-market Clinical Investigation
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Tooth extraction and bone graft procedure.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Bone Regeneration, Safety Issues. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Belgium
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Single Blinded and Parallel Controlled Clinical Investigation to Assess the Performance, Safety and Benefit of the Wishbone HA Medical Device, a Deproteinized Bovine Bone Material, as a Bone Graft Substitute in the Socket Management Indication Requiring Bone Grafting Procedure Before Implant Placement.
Overview
This investigation is a pre-market, prospective, multi-center, randomized, single blinded, parallel controlled clinical investigation performed in at least 5 clinical centers for confirmatory purposes of the use of WHA as intended in the filling of extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar socket.
Detailed description
In this study, the subjects will be pseudonymized and randomized in a 1:1 ratio between WHA and the selected comparator device Bio-Oss®. The sample size of the study has been computed based on a non-inferiority test between Bio- Oss® and WHA for device performance for the filling of extraction sockets. A total of 96 subjects will be enrolled.
The results will be used to demonstrate the safety, performance and benefit of the product WHA in the socket indication in compliance with the MDR 2017/745.
The endpoints are all accurately based on objective measurements:
* Primary Endpoint: Bone reconstruction as measured by CBCT (in mm) after bone grafting procedure. * Secondary Endpoints:
* Evaluation of implant stability at placement. * Assessment of bone density at the time of implant insertion. * Implant osteointegration at 3months after implant placement. * Evaluation of implant survival and success at 3-, 6-and12-months, 3-and 5- years after implant placement. * Rate of all Adverse Device Events (incidence, type, relatedness, severity, seriousness) from the time of grafting procedure up to 5 years after implant placement. * Patient satisfaction 6- and 12-months after implant placement. * Evaluation of the Sulcus index (peri-implant marginal tissue health status) at 6- and 12-months after implant placement.
Interventions
- Device Tooth extraction and bone graft procedure
The subject will receive a flash dose of 2 gr of amoxicillin or 600 mg of Clindamycin 1 hour before the surgery. Tooth will be extracted using gentle techniques to guarantee an atraumatic extraction. If the socket presents insufficient bleeding, the clinician must use an appropriate procedure to induce bleeding. The extraction site must be carefully cleaned. Extraction socket will then be filled with WHA or Bio-Oss previously hydrated with saline solution (0.9%). Extraction socket packed with t
Primary outcome measures
- Bone reconstruction as measured by CBCT (in mm) after bone grafting procedure. [Time frame: one year]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
- Assessment of the bone density at implant placement. [Time frame: one year]
- Evaluation of the implant primary stability. [Time frame: one year]
- Assessment of the implant osteointegration after implant placement [Time frame: 15 months]
- Implant survival rate and success evaluated at 3-, 6- and 12-months and 3- and 5- To evaluate implant survival and success 3-, 6- and 12- months and 3- and 5-years after implant placement [Time frame: 5 years]
- Collection of all adverse events (AEs) related to the device and/or procedure, and assessment of incidence, type, severity, seriousness [Time frame: 5 years]
- Evaluation of patient satisfaction at 6- and 12-months after implant placement using questionnaire. [Time frame: 2 years]
- Evaluation of the peri-implant marginal tissue health status at 6 and 12 months after implant placement. [Time frame: 2 years]
- Evaluation of the evolution of the interproximal bone level 3- and 12-months after implant placement. [Time frame: 2 years]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- The subject signed the informed consent form;
- The subject is ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old at surgery;
- The subject is in need of a tooth extraction prior to implant placement;
- All four bony walls are preserved after extraction;
- Minimum 8mm height of bone;
- Minimum 7mm thickness of lingual vestibular;
- The subject is willing and able to comply with all investigation related procedures (such as exercising oral hygiene and attending all follow-up visits);
- Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) lower than 25%;
- Full-mouth plaque score (FMPI) lower than 25%.
Exclusion criteria
- Subject with an acute infection (abscess) at the surgical site;
- Subject with untreated periodontitis or periodontal disease;
- Subject with autoimmune diseases or subjects that had received or were currently receiving treatment with antiresorptive drugs (e.g., bisphosphonates), or steroid therapy;
- Subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding;
- Subjects is a heavy smoker (>10 cigarettes a day);
- Subject with an inability to conduct basic oral hygiene (poor oral hygiene and motivation);
- Subject with metabolic diseases (diabetes, hyperparathyroidism, osteomalacia);
- Subject with severe renal dysfunction and severe liver disease;
- Subject with known severe osteoporosis;
- Subject with multiple sclerosis and/or acromegaly;
- Subject follows radiotherapy;
- Subject with psychiatric disorders or under substance abuse (drug or alcohol);
- Subject who participates in other clinical trials interfering with the present protocol;
- Mucosal diseases in the areas to be treated.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Single blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Belgium · 5 centers
- Clinique de la Source DentalMe — Louvain-la-Neuve
- Cabinet Debaty-Techy — Aubel
- Clinique du Faubourg DentalMe — Chaudfontaine
- Centre Hospitalier Université de Liège — Liège
- Centre Oxalys — Namur
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06383377 · Pre-market parallel study