Peer Support for Adolescents and Emerging Adults With Sickle Cell Pain
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: CBT+ Health coach, CBT w/o Health Coach ( self-guided), Usual Care.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Pain, Sickle Cell Disease. Basic parameters: 16 years — 30 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- United States
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Peer Support for Adolescents and Emerging Adults With Sickle Cell Pain: Promoting Engagement in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Overview
The study, known as the Peer suppoRt for adolescents and Emerging adults with Sickle cell pain: promoting ENgagement in Cognitive behavioral thErapy (PRESENCE), aims to determine the effectiveness of digital CBT in reducing pain, opioid use, and healthcare utilization among AYAs with SCD. It also seeks to understand the role of personalized peer support in enhancing engagement and outcomes of digital CBT interventions. By leveraging existing infrastructure for delivering virtual peer support interventions, tailored digital CBT programs for individuals with SCD, and partnerships with CBOs, the study aims to provide valuable insights into the feasibility and effectiveness of digital CBT as a pain management strategy for this vulnerable population.
Detailed description
The PRESENCE study aims to address the pressing issue of inadequate pain management for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with sickle cell disease (SCD). Despite pain being the primary clinical symptom of SCD, effective treatment options are limited, leading to repeated hospitalizations and negative impacts on patients' physical and mental well-being. Opioids, the primary treatment for chronic SCD pain, often fail to provide long-term relief and can result in harmful consequences.
Recognizing the need for alternative approaches, the study hopes to investigate the effectiveness of digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), both with and without personalized peer support delivered through community-based organizations (CBOs). CBT is a well-established method for managing pain in the general population, and digital CBT has shown promise in improving outcomes for individuals with chronic conditions.
The study will involve a multisite, randomized controlled trial with 470 AYAs with SCD who have experienced frequent pain over the past three months. Participants will be randomized into one of three groups:
1. Digital CBT with weekly one-on-one peer support (CBT+peer) 2. Digital CBT without peer support (self-guided CBT) 3. Usual care (UC)
The primary hypotheses of the study are:
Hypothesis 1. AYAs receiving any digital CBT (CBT + peer or self-guided CBT) will have greater improvements in primary pain outcomes (PEG-3 pain intensity and pain interference), and larger decreases in secondary pain outcomes (mean daily pain intensity, pain days, average weekly opioid dose, emergency department visits, hospitalizations) and in psychological outcomes (MoSCS internalized stigma, SCSES sickle cell self-efficacy, PHQ-9M depression, GAD-7 anxiety) than AYAs receiving UC at 6 months post initiation of intervention.
Hypothesis 2. AYAs receiving CBT + peer will have greater improvements in the primary and secondary outcomes described above at 6 months, and greater app engagement, than AYAs receiving self-guided CBT.
This study will have the following assessment time points.
* Baseline = pre-randomization baseline measures
o Rescreen if SCD verification is not provided within 30 days * At Randomization = Pain and mood diary using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) assessed daily for a total of 14 days with the first entry occuring immediately prior to randomization/intervention start and then continuing daily post-randomization * 3-month = end of intervention period assessment 90 days (3 months) post -randomization * 6-month = primary endpoint 180 days (6 months) post-randomization * 12-month = long-term endpoint 365 days (12 months) post-randomization
The study intervention and EMA data collection is performed via an iOS and Android application called CaRISMA that will be called "the app" or the "CaRISMA app" hereafter.
Interventions
- Behavioral CBT+ Health coach
Participants will complete the pre-enrollment clinical screening measures (PHQ-9M, GAD-7, and PEG-3) and will repeat those assessments, as well as outcome assessments, at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants in CBT w/ Health coach group will engage with the CaRISMA app to complete a daily pain and mood e-diary, daily record of opiate use, and weekly assessment of pain via the Painimation tool. In addition participants will have weekly contact with a peer health coach. - Behavioral CBT w/o Health Coach ( self-guided)
Participants will complete the pre-enrollment clinical screening measures (PHQ-9M, GAD-7, and PEG-3) and will repeat those assessments, as well as outcome assessments, at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants CBT w/o Health coach groups will engage with the CaRISMA app to complete a daily pain and mood e-diary, daily record of opiate use, and weekly assessment of pain via the Painimation tool. - Behavioral Usual Care
Participants will complete the pre-enrollment clinical screening measures (PHQ-9M, GAD-7, and PEG-3) and will repeat those assessments, as well as outcome assessments, at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Participants in the UC group will be asked to engage with the CaRISMA app to complete a daily pain and mood e-diary, daily record of opiate use, and weekly assessment of pain via the Painimation tool. All other care will be at the discretion of their treating provider
Primary outcome measures
- Determine the effectiveness of any digital CBT (CBT + peer or self-guided CBT) vs usual care (UC) to improve pain intensity for AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 6 months]
- Determine the effectiveness of any digital CBT (CBT + peer or self-guided CBT) vs usual care (UC) to improve pain interference for AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
- Determine the effectiveness of CBT+ peer vs. self-guided CBT to improve pain intensity for AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 6 months]
- Determine the effectiveness of CBT+ peer vs. self-guided CBT to improve pain interference for AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 6 months]
- Determine the sustained effectiveness of any digital CBT (CBT + peer or self-guided CBT) vs UC to improve pain intensity for AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months]
- Determine the sustained effectiveness of any digital CBT (CBT + peer or self-guided CBT) vs UC to improve pain interference for AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 12 months]
- Determine the sustained effectiveness of CBT+ peer vs self-guided CBT to improve pain intensity of AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 12 Months]
- Determine the sustained effectiveness of CBT+ peer vs self-guided CBT to improve pain interferences of AYAs with SCD and chronic pain [Time frame: Baseline and 12 Months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Aged 16 to 30 years of age at time of enrollment
- Sickle Cell Disease diagnosis of any genotype based on referral or documentation
- Reports chronic pain (≥4 days/week for past 3 months or more) OR A) Being prescribed pain medication to be taken (≥4 days/week for past 3 months or more) OR B) Taking pain medication (≥4 days/week for past 3 months or more) OR C) Receiving non-pharmaceutical pain treatment (≥4 days/week for past 3 months or more)
- Access to an iOS or Android mobile device with internet access
Exclusion criteria
- Unable to speak or read English
- Prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant for sickle cell disease
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
United States · 14 centers
- University of South Alabama Medical Center — Mobile
- UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital Ronald Reagan Hospital — Los Angeles
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — Hartford
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta — Atlanta
- Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — Chicago
- The Regents of the University of Michigan — Ann Arbor
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School — Newark
- Weil Cornell Medical College — New York
- … and 6 more centers
Publications
- O'Brien JA, Colvin AB, Radovic A, Oluwole OB, Smith WR, Palermo TM, Rollman BL, Dampier C, Zempsky W, DeCastro LM, Stinson J, Jonassaint CR. Digital cognitive behavioral therapy and peer support for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease and chronic pain: study protocol of a parallel, three-arm, randomized controlled trial (PRESENCE). Trials. 2026 May 12;27(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s130 PMID 42121176
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06374238 · STUDY24040171 · UG3HL165839