Menu
Recruiting NCT06372132

G-POEM vs PEG-J in Gastroparesis Patients

No phase Interventional Gastroparesis

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: G-POEM.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Gastroparesis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Netherlands
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

'Treatment Outcome of Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Comparison With Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy With Jejunal Extension in Medically Refractory Gastroparesis: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial'

Overview

Study design: A randomized non-blinded controlled clinical trial with two study arms (G-POEM and PEG-J). Treatment success is measured using the GCSI at baseline before intervention and six months after intervention with a possible cross-over after six months of follow-up. Study population: 50 patients with therapy refractory GP on dietary advices, prokinetics and possibly tube feeding (gastric rest) who have already been referred for additional treatment options in the form of PEG-J/ G-POEM. Intervention: Group 1 will receive G-POEM treatment and group 2 will receive PEG-J treatment. Main study parameters/endpoints: A clinically meaningful treatment success six months after G-POEM treatment, measured using the GCSI-score defined as a decrease of 1 or more point.

Interventions

  • Procedure G-POEM
    Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy

Primary outcome measures

  • Number of patients with treatment success using the GCSI-score in patients with refractory GP undergoing G-POEM compared to patients receiving a PEG-J at t = 6 months. [Time frame: 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Number of patients with treatment success using the GCSI-score in patients with refractory GP undergoing G-POEM compared to patients receiving a PEG-J at t = 12 months. [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Degree of quality of life using the PAGI-QOL in the G-POEM group in comparison with the PEG-J intervention six months after intervention. [Time frame: 6 months]
  • Number and severity of (s)AEs in the treatment groups. [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Predictive value of the etiology of gastroparesis on treatment outcomes following G-POEM by measuring the rate of treatment success quantified by improvements in the GCSI-score. [Time frame: 6-12 months]
  • Predictive value of the etiology of gastroparesis on treatment outcomes following PEG-J by measuring the rate of treatment success quantified by improvements in the GCSI-score. [Time frame: 6-12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with GP
  • 13C octanoic acid test or gastric scintigraphy (minimal 4-hour measurement) within the past twelve months
  • 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • < 18 years old
  • Medical history of stomach surgery in which resection of antrum and/ or pylorus took place
  • Medical history of surgical or laparoscopic pyloromyotomy
  • Gastric bypass
  • Current opioid use
  • Pregnancy

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Crossover
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Netherlands · 1 center
  • Maastricht University Medical Center — Maastricht

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06372132 · NL85305.068.23

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗