Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06369038

Children's Drawing as a Projective Tool to Assess Dental Anxiety

Observational Dental Anxiety

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: observation of level of dental anxiety in children.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Dental Anxiety. Basic parameters: 6 years — 12 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Assessment of Dental Anxiety After Children's Drawing as a Projective Tool During Dental Extraction Under Local Anesthesia - A Diagnostic Accuracy Test Study.

Overview

The aim in this study is to compare the results of anxiety measurement of the child using the CD:H scale with the long-used Face,Legs,Activity,Cry and Consolability scale (FLACC scale) , Frankl behaviour rating scale and pulse oximeter reading, to see if the drawing alone can be a reliable tool to predict the child's behaviour before the dental procedure.

Detailed description

Dental anxiety is one of the major problems facing us in pediatric dentistry, the new experience that the child has to go through together with the difficulty for the child to express his exact cause of fear increases the problem.

Research has shown that healthcare providers spend more time communicating with parents than pediatric patients. In a typical medical care visit, less than 20% of the communication engaged pediatric patients, regardless of age. Most decision-making and treatment planning are done by dentists and parents.

Even when the dentist tries to engage the child in the conversation it usually includes the social aspect "his favourite hobby, toys, school topics, etc…" rather than the medical history or treatment decisions so the child is unaccustomed to discussing his dental fears and complaints to the dentist, hence we lose a lot of the child\'s trust.

Drawing has been used in literature as a psychological method to express one\'s thoughts and fears and can be analyzed by the healthcare provider to know the deeper thoughts of the child.

Thus, the current study aims to deeply understand the children\'s point of view towards dental treatment and use the drawings as a projective tool to assess the dental anxiety in those children by simple index and defined scores that every dentist could learn and apply.

Interventions

  • Behavioral observation of level of dental anxiety in children
    analysis of children's drawings using CD:H index

Primary outcome measures

  • FLAAC behavioral scale [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged from 6 to 12 years.
  • Children with past dental experience.
  • One or more primary teeth indicated for simple extraction procedure.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients lacking cooperative behavior (very young age and patients with certain medical or psychological disorders) according to Wright's classification.
  • Refusal of participation.
  • Lack of informed consent by the child's parents.
  • If the child shows any signs of disinterest in drawing.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

Center list to be confirmed — check the primary protocol.

Publications

  • Cianetti S, Lombardo G, Lupatelli E, Pagano S, Abraha I, Montedori A, Caruso S, Gatto R, De Giorgio S, Salvato R. Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jun;18(2):121-130. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.07. PMID 28598183
  • Facco E, Zanette G, Favero L, Bacci C, Sivolella S, Cavallin F, Manani G. Toward the validation of visual analogue scale for anxiety. Anesth Prog. 2011 Spring;58(1):8-13. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-58.1.8. PMID 21410359
  • Clatworthy S, Simon K, Tiedeman ME. Child drawing: hospital--an instrument designed to measure the emotional status of hospitalized school-aged children. J Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Feb;14(1):2-9. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80054-2. PMID 10063243
  • Voepel-Lewis T, Zanotti J, Dammeyer JA, Merkel S. Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624. PMID 20045849

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06369038 · CUP3222024

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗