Menu
Recruiting NCT06368323

Effect of Community Choir Singing in People With Chronic Post-stroke Aphasia

No phase Interventional Aphasia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Choir singing, Usual care.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Aphasia. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States, Canada
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The goal of this randomized controled trial is to test the effects of assigning people with chronic post-stroke aphasia to 12 weekly choir sessions, compared to usual care. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the assignment to a choir singing program causes a beneficial effect on functional communication and language recovery as well as psychosocial outcomes compared to usual care in the rehabilitation of people with chronic post-stroke aphasia? Participants will have: 12 in-person choir-singing sessions (1 session/week, 1,5 h/session, total 18h) conducted by a choir master, and home singing training (3 x 30-minutes-sessions/week, total 18h)

Detailed description

Description of study population Additional information: Participants with chronic aphasia due to stroke will be recruited from four participating centers in Canada and the United States.

Study design Additional information: A parallel group randomized trial design with a secondary crossover extension was chosen for this study to offer the intervention to all participants. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two study arms (AB/BA, A = 12 weekly choir sessions and home singing training, B = usual care) stratified for aphasia severity (according to the Quick Aphasia Battery overall score), age, time since last stroke and their interest in music (according to the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire). Measures at the "macro" level will be collected at Baseline, Completion and 2-months Follow-up time points for each group. At the "micro" level (i.e., at choir sessions 2, 6, 10 and 12) data will be collected during as well as pre and post choir-singing.

Intervention Additional information: The repertoire in the comunity choir activity will consist of popular songs in English or French. Half of the songs will be pre-determined and half will be chosen by the choir members from a list, based on a vote during the first week of the intervention. Eligible songs will remain within the range of an octave and include a variety of tempi (but fast tempi will be slowed down if needed to facilitate word production). Depending on the group's abilities, the Choir Director will decide in which keys the songs will be performed, and whether they will be sung in unison or with simple harmonies. Songs in canon will be included in the predetermined repertoire to easily create harmonies. Each session will include (in this order): 15 minutes for vocal warm-up; 25 minutes of work on the song repertoire; 20 minutes for a social break with refreshments.

For the home training, participants will be instructed to sing at home with a video guide on an online platform. Each home training session will include (in this order): 10 minutes for vocal warm-up; and 20 minutes sing-along using songs of the repertoire. Song lyrics will be displayed on the video.

To monitor the usual care, each participant (and/or caregiver) will complete a form and/or have a weekly 5-15-minute phone/Zoom call with a research assistant to collect the usual care data including type and time spent in social activities and rehabilitation services, as well as adverse events.

Randomization and concealment For randomization, an online system will be used by a researcher not involved in data collection.

Each participant will be assigned an identification number upon inclusion in the study. After completion of the baseline assessments, the independent researcher will receive the list of participants' IDs with their stratification data (age, time post-stoke, aphasia severity, level of interest in music) to perform the randomization.

Blinding:

Outcomes will be measured by blinded assessors where possible, based on video or audio recordings.

Planned analyses:

Primary hypothesis:

Participants assigned to the choir intervention over 12 weeks will demonstrate a significantly larger improvement in macro-level measures compared to those receiving usual care.

Secondary hypothesis:

Participants who completed the choir intervention with 80% adherence over 12 weeks will demonstrate a larger improvement in macro-level measures compared to those receiving usual care.

The gains will be maintained for the participants with 80% adherence.

There will be immediate changes in micro-level measures after a choir session (Session 6).

There will be differences in pre-post-session variations of micro-level measures between Session 2, 6 and 10.

There will be differences in pre-post-session variations between the usual rehearsal (Session 10) and the Concert (Session 12).

Interventions

  • Behavioral Choir singing
    The 12-week intervention will consist of 12 in-person choir-singing sessions (1 session/week, 1,5 h/session, total 18h) conducted by a choir master in addition to home training (3 x 30-minutes-sessions/week, total 18h). In total, participants will undergo the intervention for 3 hours/week for 12 weeks (i.e., 36 hours).
  • Other Usual care
    Rehabilitation services received by patients and social activities will be monitored and documented.

Primary outcome measures

  • Communication Index [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
Secondary outcome measures (10)
  • Level of confidence in communication [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Aphasia severity index [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Speech and language in functional communication [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Apraxia of speech severity [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Health related quality of life assessed by the the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39) [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Emotional wellbeing [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Social participation [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Generic measure of health [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Appetence to music [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]
  • Singing voice abilities [Time frame: T1 (baseline, week 1), T2 (week 15), T3 (week 16), T4 (week 30), T5 (week 31)]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • People with chronic aphasia following stroke
  • English or French as language of daily use
  • Last stroke must have occurred at least 6 months before the start of the first assessments in the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

  • Regular music making in the past 6 months
  • Visual deficit that cannot be corrected and might impair testing
  • Hearing deficit that cannot be corrected and might impair testing
  • Presence of neurological/psychiatric co-morbidity or substance abuse
  • No ability to produce vocal sound through singing/humming
  • Legally considered unable to make decisions for oneself

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Canada · 3 centers
  • University of Ottawa — Ottawa
  • Toronto Metropolitan University — Toronto
  • Université de Montréal — Montreal
United States · 1 center
  • University of South Florida — Tampa

Publications

  • Siponkoski ST, Pitkaniemi A, Laitinen S, Sarkamo ER, Pentikainen E, Eloranta H, Tuomiranta L, Melkas S, Schlaug G, Sihvonen AJ, Sarkamo T. Efficacy of a multicomponent singing intervention on communication and psychosocial functioning in chronic aphasia: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Brain Commun. 2022 Dec 27;5(1):fcac337. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac337. eCollection 2023. PMID 36687394
  • Anna Zumbansen, Isabelle Peretz, Carole Anglade, Josée Bilodeau, Suzanne Généreux, Michelyne Hubert & Sylvie Hébert (2017) Effect of choir activity in the rehabilitation of aphasia: a blind, randomised, controlled pilot study, Aphasiology, 31:8, 879-900, DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1227424

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06368323 · H-01-24-9931

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗