Menu
Not yet recruiting NCT06366737

En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances

No phase Interventional Maxillary Prognathism

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: KILBON Appliance, CAT appliance.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Maxillary Prognathism. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Egypt
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →

Official title

Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In En-mass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment In Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

en-mass retraction by lingual retractor versus clear alighner therapy

Detailed description

Comparative Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion Treated By Upper First Premolars Extraction And Enmass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment Using Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrews :A Randomized Clinical Trial

Interventions

  • Device KILBON Appliance
    palatal TAD assissted lingual appliance for en-mass retraction
  • Device CAT appliance
    palatal TAD assissted clear aligner

Primary outcome measures

  • Patient satisfaction during & after phase I treatment. [Time frame: 6 months]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • inclination of upper anterior teeth [Time frame: 6 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with mild crowding

Exclusion criteria

  • \- adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with moderate to severe crowding

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Egypt · 1 center
  • Faculty of Dentistry — Cairo

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06366737 · CEBD-CU-2024-03-02

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗