Syncope-Asystole Latency Time in Tilt Table Test: The SALT-TILT Study
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Tilt Table Test.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Syncope, Pacemaker, Asystole, Neurally Mediated Syncope. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Italy
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
NeuroArrhythmias Area Registry of AIAC (NAARA) Syncope-Asystole Latency Time in Tilt Table Test (SALT-TILT) Study
Overview
Syncope is a common presenting condition. Pacemaker implantation can significantly reduce syncope recurrences in reflex syncope. However, despite careful selection, a substantial proportion of patients treated with pacemakers suffer recurrences of syncope. It is thought that a pronounced vasodepressor component may hinder the efficacy of pacing in patients, preventing adequate cerebral perfusion during the reflex, thus relativizing the anti-bradycardia function of the pacemaker to prevent syncope. It is hypothesised that the time elapsed from the actual loss of consciousness to the asystole recorded on the ECG during Tilt Table Test may be predictive in terms of response to pacemaker therapy, so this parameter becomes the subject of the present study.
Detailed description
Syncope is a common leading affection and is responsible for 1-3% of the presentations in emergency departments and up to 3% of inpatient admissions. Syncope poses often a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the attending physician and is often misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed. Patients can be treated with pacemaker implantation when the syncope cause is a cardioinhibition with documented asystole during the syncopal event. When accurately selected, patients benefit from pacemaker therapy with a significant reduction of syncope recurrence in the follow up. However, a substantial portion of the patients (approx. 25%) experience recurrence of syncope despite optimal pacemaker therapy. The underlying mechanism is not well understood and object of the current study.
The main target of the study is to evaluate the time elapsed between the T-LOC during Video Tilt Table Testing and the asystole at the ECG using a registry and to assess its predictive value in patients undergoing invasive treatment. The hypothesis is that a vasodepressive component could lessen the effect of pacing in a patient, leading to cerebral hypoperfusion and syncope despite maintaining a stable rhythm.
This is a prospective, multi-center observational study with 2 year follow-up of patients. Patients eligible for invasive treatment of reflex syncope are included.
If after guideline-directed implantable loop recorder insertion no cardioinhibition has been recorded, the patient is included automatically in the registry.
Interventions
- Diagnostic test Tilt Table Test
The main goal of the study is to evaluate the time elapsed between the T-LOC during Video Tilt Table Testing and the asystole at the ECG using a national registry and to assess its predictive value in patients undergoing invasive treatment. The hypothesis is that a vasodepressive component could lessen the effect of pacing in a patient, leading to cerebral hypoperfusion and syncope despite maintaining a stable rhythm.
Primary outcome measures
- SALT (Syncope-Asystole Latency Time) [Time frame: From enrollment to end of treatment 2 weeks]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
- Recurrence of syncope [Time frame: From enrollment to treatment end 24 months]
- Recurrence of syncope [Time frame: 24 months]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients eligible for invasive treatment according to the ESC Guidelines for pacing 2021
- Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Other condition which explains syncope cause other than reflex syncope
- Structural heart disease (valvular, ischaemic, cardiomyopathies)
- Pregnancy
- Patient denial to be recorded on video during tilt table test
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
Study locations
Italy · 1 center
- Azienda Sanitaria di Bolzano — Bolzano
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06356207 · 113-2023