Comparison Between Combined ALLR With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction, Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Taiwan
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Clinical Comparison and Motion Analysis of Sports Function Between Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Overview
The goal of this clinical trial is to test and compare different surgical techniques in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What are the optimal criteria for selecting between single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction? * How do these two surgical techniques compare in terms of post-operative knee stability, functional outcomes, and reducing re-tear rates? Participants will: * Undergo pre-operative MRI imaging, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis evaluations * Be randomly assigned to either: * Single-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction * Double-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction * Receive the assigned surgical procedure * Participate in post-operative follow-ups, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis at 6 months and 1 year Researchers will compare the single-bundle ACL + ALL group and the double-bundle ACL + ALL group to see if one technique demonstrates superior knee stability, functional outcomes (e.g. return to sport ability), and lower ACL re-tear rates.
Detailed description
Anterolateral ligament(ALL) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction(ACL) has become more and more popular in recent years, as ALL could protect the ACL graft in tibial internal rotation, and prevent the ACL graft from rupture. Cottet et al. proposed a minimal invasive method with Y-figure construct of ALL, without acquiring additional graft from the patient. Their data showed significant lower graft re-rupture rate and faster return-to-sport(RTS). There are many different techniques of ACL combined ALL reconstruction. While these methods mostly are single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction. Previous cadaver studies told that the anterior cruciate ligament is composed of anteromedial and posterolateral bundle. It had been debated between single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction for years. As a result, it is meaningful to compare the clinical outcomes between ALL combined with single bundle or double bundle ACL reconstruction. Our studies included MRI image, arthrometer measurement and optical motion capture system. We hope to compare the clinical outcomes and sports function between A: single bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction and B: double bundle ACL combined ALL reconstruction.
Interventions
- Procedure Single-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
Single-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique. In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material. The single ACL bundle is typically positioned to replicate the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using - Procedure Double-bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
Double-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL\'s anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material. The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL\'s complex anatomic footprint and bundles\' tens
Primary outcome measures
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) [Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year]
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) [Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year]
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) [Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year]
- Knee ligament stability: [Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year]
- Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation [Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year]
- Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation [Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year]
- Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation [Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year]
- Functional performance and return to sport [Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year]
- Functional performance and return to sport [Time frame: Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year]
- Imaging [Time frame: Preoperative, 1 year]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Patients plan to receive ACL surgery
- at least 18 years old
Exclusion criteria
- Presented history of the injured leg or congenital abnormality
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Non-randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Taiwan · 1 center
- Chang Gung memorial hospital — Taoyuan
Publications
- Cameron KL, Peck KY, Davi SM, Owens CRBD, Svoboda CRSJ, DiStefano LJ, Marshall SW, de la Motte SJ, Beutler CRAI, Padua DA. Association Between Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Items and the Incidence Rate of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):23259671221100790. doi: 10.1177/23259671221100790. eCollection 2022 Jun. PMID 35706554
- Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M. Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 17. PMID 27324971
- Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4. PMID 25740835
- Batty LM, Firth A, Moatshe G, Bryant DM, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, Peterson DC, Bardana D, MacDonald PB, Verdonk PCM, Spalding T, Getgood AMJ; STABILITY Study Group; Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Wanlin S, Firth A, Pinto R, Martindale A, O'Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Pritchett R, Payne K, Fan B, Mohan B, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, S PMID 33889648
- Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, Monaco E, de Padua VBC, Thaunat M, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Zijl J, Claes S. Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jun;18(2):91-106. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0449-8. PMID 28220268
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06341192 · ChangGungMH ALL SB DB