Menu
Recruiting NCT06339320

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) for the Treatment of Obesity

No phase Interventional Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Obesity

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, Obesity. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

The purpose of this study is to evaluate endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) for the treatment of obesity. The ESG procedure is an U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved procedure for the treatment of obesity - patients with a body mass index (BMI) 30-50 kg/m2. This procedure is FDA approved; however, Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-Accredited centers (such as Houston Methodist Hospital) must receive approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) in order to perform primary procedures, such as ESG, that are not endorsed by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS).

Detailed description

Obesity has become an epidemic on a national and international scale with immense burden of disease. Approximately one out of every three United States (U.S.) adults are characterized as having obesity with the global prevalence having nearly tripled over the last four decades to include over 650 million people. Although diet and exercise are essential, these interventions alone typically result in only 1-3% total weight loss. Pharmacotherapy is effective but has side effects and carries the risk of weight recurrence once discontinued. While bariatric surgery is the most robust treatment option, only 1% of eligible patients undergo surgery, leaving a tremendous need for effective and safe therapies.

Helping to bridge this gap in available treatments, the endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) procedure provides a way to improve access to validated, efficacious, and safe anti-obesity treatments. ESG is an endoscopic weight loss procedure. The procedure uses an endoscopic suturing device, which has received FDA authorization as a minimally invasive procedure to facilitate weight loss for adults with obesity (BMI 30-50 kg/m2) who have been unable to lose weight or maintain weight loss through more conservative measures such as diet and exercise. This procedure involves endoscopic suturing to reduce the volume of the stomach endoscopically by approximately 70% to 80% its original size. Following the procedure, the new stomach appears similar to the surgical sleeve stomach, although the procedure is considered less invasive with fewer complications compared to a surgical sleeve procedure.

This study aims to perform ESG for patients with obesity, defined as a BMI 30-50 kg/m2. Additionally, data collection of relevant weight-related and metabolic outcomes, including comorbidity resolution will be collected retrospectively from the study to assess efficacy and safety of the ESG procedure. Data collection for the MBSAQIP registry will be recorded on a monthly basis.

Interventions

  • Procedure Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG)
    The ESG procedure uses the Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device, which has received FDA authorization as a minimally invasive procedure to facilitate weight loss for adults with who have been unable to lose weight or maintain weight loss through more conservative measures such as diet and exercise. This procedure involves endoscopic suturing to reduce the volume of the stomach endoscopically by approximately 70% to 80% its original size. Using the Apollo OverStitch or APOLLO ESG and ESG
  • Device Apollo OverStitch endoscopic suturing device
    Apollo ESG is the first and only device to be authorized by the FDA to perform the ESG procedure to facilitate weight loss in patients with obesity (BMI 30 to 50 kg/m2). The FDA identifies this generic type of device as an Endoscopic suturing device for altering gastric anatomy for weight loss.

Primary outcome measures

  • Number of participants with technically successful completion of the ESG procedure [Time frame: Procedural completion over 10 year period]
  • Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 [Time frame: 30 days post-procedure]
Secondary outcome measures (2)
  • Change in body mass index (BMI) measured by kg/m2 [Time frame: BMI (kg/m2) measured day of procedure, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 month intervals]
  • Change in hemoglobin A1C (%) [Time frame: A1C measured pre-procedure, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 month intervals]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with BMI 30 to 50 kg/m2
  • Patients that have been unable able to lose weight, or maintain weight loss, through more conservative measures (i.e., lifestyle interventions including diet and exercise) per the FDA approval for the Apollo ESG device. Lifestyle interventions may include traditional diet and anaerobic or aerobic exercise, including resistance training.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are actively pregnant
  • Active tobacco use (defined as tobacco within 4 weeks prior to the procedure)
  • Active gastric mucosal lesions
  • Active bleeding or potential bleeding gastric lesions (i.e., ulcers, erosive gastritis, varices, or vascular malformations)
  • Neoplastic lesions (i.e., esophageal, gastric, or small bowel cancer)
  • Hiatal hernia >5 cm
  • Severe coagulopathy and antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy that cannot be corrected
  • Psychiatric disorders not assessed or cleared by a psychologist or psychiatrist actively participating in that patient's care (i.e., affective disorders not under medical supervision or refractory to medical therapy and all eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder, specified feeding and eating disorders, avoidant restrictive food intake, and rumination)
  • Patients with endoscopic interventions that are contraindicated

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
N/A
Model
Single group
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United States · 2 centers
  • Houston Methodist Hospital — Houston
  • Houston Methodist Hospital - Sugarland — Sugar Land

Publications

  • Abu Dayyeh BK, Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, Sharaiha RZ, Thompson CC, Thaemert BC, Teixeira AF, Chapman CG, Kumbhari V, Ujiki MB, Ahrens J, Day C; MERIT Study Group; Galvao Neto M, Zundel N, Wilson EB. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):441-451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01280-6. Ep PMID 35908555
  • Sharaiha RZ, Kumta NA, Saumoy M, Desai AP, Sarkisian AM, Benevenuto A, Tyberg A, Kumar R, Igel L, Verna EC, Schwartz R, Frissora C, Shukla A, Aronne LJ, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Significantly Reduces Body Mass Index and Metabolic Complications in Obese Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-510. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 23. PMID 28017845
  • Alqahtani A, Al-Darwish A, Mahmoud AE, Alqahtani YA, Elahmedi M. Short-term outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in 1000 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1132-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 19. PMID 30578757
  • Singh S, Hourneaux de Moura DT, Khan A, Bilal M, Ryan MB, Thompson CC. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty worldwide for treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Feb;16(2):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PMID 31932205
  • Novikov AA, Afaneh C, Saumoy M, Parra V, Shukla A, Dakin GF, Pomp A, Dawod E, Shah S, Aronne LJ, Sharaiha RZ. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Laparoscopic Band for Weight Loss: How Do They Compare? J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Feb;22(2):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3615-7. Epub 2017 Nov 6. PMID 29110192
  • Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi M, Aldarwish A, Abdurabu HY, Alqahtani S. Endoscopic gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a noninferiority propensity score-matched comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.050. Epub 2022 Mar 3. PMID 35248571

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06339320 · PRO00037835

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗