Menu
Recruiting NCT06320665

Assessment of Vertical Pattern in Correlation With Third Molar Inclusion : A 3D CBCT Analysis

Observational Impacted Third Molar Tooth

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Radiographic measurement.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Impacted Third Molar Tooth. Basic parameters: from 15 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Assessment of Vertical Pattern in Correlation With Third Molar Inclusion : a 3D CBCT Analysis

Overview

The objective is to compare the sagittal and vertical skeletal parameters of patients with an impacted third molar. Patients will be analyzed according to their skeletal characteristics: skeletal class (sagittal direction) and facial skeletal typology (vertical direction). The inclusion characteristics of third molars will also be analyzed, to see the links between typology and inclusion. The principal hypothesis is no significant difference in third molar inclusion patterns in relation to skeletal divergence.

Detailed description

The study is a non-interventional (observational) research involving the human person, research on existing data (retrospective study) and samples dealing with dentofacial orthopedics.

This study analyzes third molar inclusion patterns in relation with the skeletal characteristics, sagittal and vertical typology.

This is a comparative retrospective study of radiographs in three dimensions before any orthodontic treatment. The patients studied are at Bacchetti CS stage 5 (adults), and the third molar must be at least at Nolla stage 6 of formation.

There is no control group but there are subgroups depending of the skeletal characterics.

Interventions

  • Other Radiographic measurement
    Measurements taken on 3D radiographs, to assess third molar inclusion and skeletal typology (vertical and sagittal)

Primary outcome measures

  • Distance between the occlusal plane and the second molar [Time frame: One day]
  • Angle of the third molar [Time frame: One day]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • CMV stage 5 on lateral radiography (end of growth)
  • at least one impacted third molar at minimum Nolla stage 6 development

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous maxillofacial trauma
  • Growing patients
  • Missing permanent tooth or early avulsion
  • Dysplasia
  • Dentofacial deformities
  • Endocrinological pathologies with implications for maxillofacial growth
  • Syndromes
  • History of maxillofacial or orthognathic surgery
  • History of orthodontic treatment
  • Incomplete data

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Observational model
Other

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Département d'Orthopédie dento-faciale — Nancy

Publications

  • Idris AM, Al-Mashraqi AA, Abidi NH, Vani NV, Elamin EI, Khubrani YH, Sh Alhazmi A, Alamir AH, Fageeh HN, Meshni AA, Mashyakhy MH, Makrami AM, Gareeb Alla Abdalla A, Jafer M. Third molar impaction in the Jazan Region: Evaluation of the prevalence and clinical presentation. Saudi Dent J. 2021 May;33(4):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 4. PMID 34025081
  • Costa MG, Pazzini CA, Pantuzo MC, Jorge ML, Marques LS. Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2013 Mar-Apr;27(2):183-8. PMID 23538430
  • Hounsome J, Pilkington G, Mahon J, Boland A, Beale S, Kotas E, Renton T, Dickson R. Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(30):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta24300. PMID 32589125
  • Tassoker M, Kok H, Sener S. Is There a Possible Association between Skeletal Face Types and Third Molar Impaction? A Retrospective Radiographic Study. Med Princ Pract. 2019;28(1):70-74. doi: 10.1159/000495005. Epub 2018 Oct 31. PMID 30380552
  • Legovic M, Legovic I, Brumini G, Vandura I, Cabov T, Ovesnik M, Mestrovic S, Slaj M, Skrinjaric A. Correlation between the pattern of facial growth and the position of the mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;66(6):1218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.013. PMID 18486787
  • Aoun Y, Husseini B, Younes R, Ghosn N, Bouserhal J. Assessment of lower third molar space: A comparative radiographic study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Jul 1;51(5):20220049. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220049. Epub 2022 May 4. PMID 35466682
  • Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e678-88. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17721. PMID 22322503
  • Li C, Teixeira H, Tanna N, Zheng Z, Chen SHY, Zou M, Chung CH. The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;11(12):2292. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122292. PMID 34943528

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06320665 · 2024PI003

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗