Menu
Recruiting NCT06294028

International Multicenter Project Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Implantable Defibrillator After Well-tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease With Minimally Impaired Ejection Fraction

No phase Interventional Ischemic Heart Disease Ventricular Tachycardia

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Adverse events collection, Quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L, Medical-economic evaluation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Ischemic Heart Disease, Ventricular Tachycardia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 90 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
France
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Evidence for the usefulness of the defibrillator in cases of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia (without cardiocirculatory arrest or syncope) is lacking, as no previous trials have included such patients. Additionally, sudden death in this particular population is low compared to other subgroups of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. On the other hand, numerous recent retrospective data show that ablation of ventricular tachycardia can reduce mortality, and also clearly reduces the number of recurrences in prospective studies. Finally, a very low rate of sudden death was observed in a multicenter European retrospective study that we conducted, including patients with well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease with minimally impaired ejection fraction and benefiting from ablation without implantation of defibrillator.

Interventions

  • Other Adverse events collection
    Collection of deaths from any cause, hospitalizations or emergency consultations for any event related to ventricular arrhythmia or its treatment (recurrence of ventricular tachycardia or complication linked to the defibrillator or crossover from one group to another)
  • Other Quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L
    Questionnaire on the patient's quality of life and health in 6 questions: on mobility, the person's autonomy, current activities, pain, anxiety. Answers range from "no problem" to "unable" and 5 possible answers to each question. The last question concerns the patient's health, the patient must rate his or her health on a scale of 0 to 100
  • Other Medical-economic evaluation
    Collection of expenses incurred by the care of patients in each arm will be collected over a period of 36 months. Direct medical and non-medical costs as well as costs related to absences from the workplace will be included in the analysis. Healthcare consumption will be collected using the National Health Data System (SNDS).

Primary outcome measures

  • Monitoring for the occurrence of at least one serious event during the 36 months of follow-up [Time frame: 36 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • ischemic heart disease with history of infarction - LVEF> 35% (measured by MRI)
  • sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia - without history of syncope or cardiac arrest -
  • having signed informed consent
  • affiliated to a social security system

Exclusion criteria

  • transient regressive cause of ventricular tachycardia
  • recent myocardial infarction (<2 months)
  • ventricular tachycardia by reentry from branch to branch
  • serious conduction disturbances (with indication of stimulation)
  • contraindication to the implantation of a defibrillator or to the performance of an ablation (life expectancy <1 year, relevant comorbidities)
  • pregnancy
  • age <18 years
  • Patient under legal protection, guardianship or curatorship

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study locations

France · 1 center
  • Rangueil Hospital — Toulouse

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06294028 · RC31/21/0338

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗