Efficacy of Electroacupuncture Combined With Pregabalin in the Treatment of Trigeminal Herpetic Neuralgia: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Medication Group, EA Group, EA+Medication Group.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Trigeminal Herpetic Neuralgia. Basic parameters: 18 years — 85 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Overview
Trigeminal herpetic neuralgia is a common type of Zoster-associated Pain (ZAP), which troubles individuals in all ages and burdens society all over the world. Eleactroaupuncture (EA) is increasingly used in the treatment of ZAP due to its advantages such as low price, high safety, no adverse reactions, and high patient acceptance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of EA on ZAP and whether EA can be used as a substitute for pregabalin.
Detailed description
Trigeminal herpetic neuralgia is a common type of Zoster-associated Pain (ZAP), which troubles individuals in all ages and burdens society all over the world. Eleactroaupuncture (EA) is increasingly used in the treatment of ZAP due to its advantages such as low price, high safety, no adverse reactions, and high patient acceptance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of EA on ZAP and whether EA can be used as a substitute for pregabalin.
Interventions
- Other Medication Group
Participants in the medication group would take 150-mg pregabalin capsules (manufactured by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd) orally twice daily (total daily dose, 300 mg) for 4 weeks. - Other EA Group
Acupoints selection: Ashi acupoint, Sibai acupoint (ST2), Xiaguan acupoint (ST7), and Dicang acupoint (ST4) on the affected side. Acupoints for the diseased branches (all taken from the affected side): eye branch and Tongziliao point (GB1), the maxillary branch is taken from the Quanliao point (SI18), and the mandibular branch is taken from the Jiache point (ST6).Shenting point (DU24), Baihui point (DU20), Hegu point (LI4), Waiguan point (TE5), Yanglingquan point (GB34), and Taichong point (LR3) - Other EA+Medication Group
Participants in the EA+Medication group would receive both EA and medical treatement. The acupoints and their location, needles, the settings of the EA device are the same as EA Group's; in the meanwhile, the medication and its dosage is the same as Medication Group's.
Primary outcome measures
- Visual Analog Score change [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
- McGill Pain Questionnaire Short Form (SF-MPQ) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
- Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI-SF) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
- Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
- Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) [Time frame: Weeks 0 (baseline), Week 2 (Treatment), Week 4 (Treatment), Week 8 (Follow-up), and Week 16 (Follow-up)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- meet the aforementioned diagnostic criteria for trigeminal ZAP, with a disease duration of 1 to 3 months;
- have a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 4 points ≤ VAS ≤ 7 points;
- be between 18 and 85 years old, regardless of gender;
- have clear consciousness, the ability to distinguish pain, and complete basic communication;
- voluntarily participate in the study, sign a written informed consent form, and fully understand the plan.
Exclusion criteria
- do not meet the above-mentioned inclusion criteria;
- have concomitant herpes zoster on the trunk or extremities, or other special types of herpes zoster like meningeal herpes zoster or visceral herpes zoster;
- are pregnant or lactating patients;
- are allergic to pregabalin or acupuncture stimulation;
- have severe organ damage, cognitive dysfunction, mental disorder, aphasia, or other serious diseases that hinder cooperation with treatment;
- have severe skin diseases;
- have a pacemaker;
- have been or are currently participating in other clinical studies within the past 3 months.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
China · 1 center
- The Hangzhou Third People's Hospital — Hangzhou
Publications
- Werner RN, Nikkels AF, Marinovic B, Schafer M, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Agius AM, Bata-Csorgo Z, Breuer J, Girolomoni G, Gross GE, Langan S, Lapid-Gortzak R, Lesser TH, Pleyer U, Sellner J, Verjans GM, Wutzler P, Dressler C, Erdmann R, Rosumeck S, Nast A. European consensus-based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster - guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the PMID 27579792
- Johnson RW, Rice AS. Clinical practice. Postherpetic neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1526-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1403062. No abstract available. PMID 25317872
- Wood M. Understanding pain in herpes zoster: an essential for optimizing treatment. J Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 15;186 Suppl 1:S78-82. doi: 10.1086/342958. PMID 12353191
- Kawai K, Gebremeskel BG, Acosta CJ. Systematic review of incidence and complications of herpes zoster: towards a global perspective. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 10;4(6):e004833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004833. PMID 24916088
- Gan EY, Tian EA, Tey HL. Management of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Apr;14(2):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s40257-013-0011-2. PMID 23456596
- Oster G, Harding G, Dukes E, Edelsberg J, Cleary PD. Pain, medication use, and health-related quality of life in older persons with postherpetic neuralgia: results from a population-based survey. J Pain. 2005 Jun;6(6):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.359. PMID 15943957
- Dubinsky RM, Kabbani H, El-Chami Z, Boutwell C, Ali H; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter: treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: an evidence-based report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2004 Sep 28;63(6):959-65. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000140708.62856.72. PMID 15452284
- Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Kent J, Mackey SC, Raja SN, Stacey BR, Levy RM, Backonja M, Baron R, Harke H, Loeser JD, Treede RD, Turk DC, Wells CD. Interventional management of neuropathic pain: NeuPSIG recommendations. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2249-2261. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jun 6. PMID 23748119
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06261801 · GZY-ZJ-KJ-23088