Early Pancreatic Stent Placement for Preventing PEP
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: early pancreatic stent placement (EPSP).
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Rretrograde, Post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
Early Versus Late Pancreatic Stent Placement for Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: a Multicentre, Randomised Trial
Overview
Our aim is to compare early versus late pancreatic stent placement in preventing PEP among patients with naive papilla. The EVL trial will provide essential answers regarding the optimal timing of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in PEP prevention.All patients with difficult biliary cannulation undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique for biliary access will be told about the opportunity to participate in EVL research. In total, 768 patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to two arms: (1) early pancreatic stent placement (EPSP) (a pancreatic stent will be placed immediately after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST)) and (2) late pancreatic stent placement (LPSP) (a pancreatic stent will be placed after all completion of therapeutic biliary procedures, e.g. biliary stone removal or drainage).The primary outcome is the rate and severity of PEP. The secondary outcomes are hyperamylasemia, the rate of stenting success, and other ERCP-related adverse events (AEs).
Detailed description
Patients with challenging biliary access using pancreatic guidewire-assisted method will be enrolled in the study. Recruitment will take place among individuals referred to the four participating centers for therapeutic biliary procedures. After obtaining signed consent forms, participants who meet all the inclusion criteria and have no exclusion criteria will be randomly grouped (with a 1:1 ratio) into EPSP and LPSP
Interventions
- Device early pancreatic stent placement (EPSP)
In the EPSP group, a single pig-tail pancreatic stent (5Fr) will be inserted instantly after ERC or EST, and subsequent biliary procedures will proceed as planned. In contrast, in the LPSP group, while keeping the PD guidewire in place, a single pig-tail PD stent (5Fr) will be ultimately placed after all completion of therapeutic biliary procedures, e.g. biliary stone removal or drainage.
Primary outcome measures
- The incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis [Time frame: up to 1 months]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- the incidence of hyperamylasemia [Time frame: up to 1 months]
- the rate of stenting success [Time frame: Intra-procedure]
- the incidence of other ERCP-related adverse events [Time frame: within 30 days after ERCP]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Participants who fulfill all the below criteria will be enrolled: 1. with naive papilla; 2. over 18 years; 3. undergoing ERCP with pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique for biliary access; 4. providing a signed, written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded: 1. unreachable main papillae; 2. surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy; 3. concurrent acute pancreatitis; 4. biliary cannulation over pancreatic duct stent after precut sphincterotomy or wire-guided method (native early attribute); 5. failed biliary cannulation; 6. severe active cardiopulmonary disease; 7. breastfeeding or pregnancy; 8. ampullary tumour.
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
China · 2 centers
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University — Hefei
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University — Hefei
Publications
- Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available. PMID 20189503
- Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G, Kozaka K, Endo I, Deziel DJ, Miura F, Okamoto K, Hwang TL, Huang WS, Ker CG, Chen MF, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Noguchi Y, Shikata S, Ukai T, Higuchi R, Gabata T, Mori Y, Iwashita Y, Hibi T, Jagannath P, Jonas E, Liau KH, Dervenis C, Gouma DJ, Cherqui D, Belli G, Garden OJ, Gimenez ME, de Santibanes E, Suzuki K, Umezawa A, PMID 29032636
- Hakuta R, Hamada T, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Kogure H, Takahara N, Mizuno S, Yagioka H, Togawa O, Matsubara S, Ito Y, Yamamoto N, Tada M, Koike K. Early pancreatic stent placement in wire-guided biliary cannulation: A multicenter retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;34(6):1116-1122. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14453. Epub 2018 Sep 19. PMID 30152138
- Arain MA, Freeman ML. Pharmacologic prophylaxis alone is not adequate to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;109(6):910-2. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.123. PMID 24896759
- Sasahira N, Kawakami H, Isayama H, Uchino R, Nakai Y, Ito Y, Matsubara S, Ishiwatari H, Uebayashi M, Yagioka H, Togawa O, Toda N, Sakamoto N, Kato J, Koike K. Early use of double-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: the multicenter randomized controlled EDUCATION trial. Endoscopy. 2015 May;47(5):421-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391228. Epub 2015 Jan 15. PMID 25590186
- Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, Ren X, Lu NH, Fan ZN, Huang Q, Zhang X, He LP, Sun WS, Zhao Q, Shi RH, Tian ZB, Li YQ, Li W, Zhi FC. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan;104(1):31-40. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.5. PMID 19098846
- Buxbaum JL, Freeman M, Amateau SK, Chalhoub JM, Coelho-Prabhu N, Desai M, Elhanafi SE, Forbes N, Fujii-Lau LL, Kohli DR, Kwon RS, Machicado JD, Marya NB, Pawa S, Ruan WH, Sheth SG, Thiruvengadam NR, Thosani NC, Qumseya BJ; (ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair). American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: summary and recommendati PMID 36517310
- ASGE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE COMMITTEE; Buxbaum JL, Freeman M, Amateau SK, Chalhoub JM, Chowdhury A, Coelho-Prabhu N, Das R, Desai M, Elhanafi SE, Forbes N, Fujii-Lau LL, Kohli DR, Kwon RS, Machicado JD, Marya NB, Pawa S, Ruan WH, Sadik J, Sheth SG, Thiruvengadam NR, Thosani NC, Zhou S, Qumseya BJ; (ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair). American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelin PMID 36517309
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06250803 · PJ 2023-14-12