Menu
Recruiting NCT06243848

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Injection With Median Nerve Decompression Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

No phase Interventional Musculoskeletal Diseases Median Nerve Disease Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Ultrasound-Guided Injection

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Minimal Incision Surgery for median nerve decompression, Ultrasound-guided perineural injection with 5 cc 5% Dextrose.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Musculoskeletal Diseases, Median Nerve Disease, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Ultrasound-Guided Injection. Basic parameters: 18 years — 75 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Turkey (Türkiye)
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Injection With Traditional Median Nerve Decompression Surgery in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Study

Overview

The aim of this study is to compare ultrasound-guided perineural injection of the median nerve with classic minimal incision surgical technique for median nerve decompression in patients diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe carpal tunnel syndrome.

Detailed description

Carpal tunnel syndrome represents the most prevalent type of entrapment neuropathy. Anatomically, the carpal tunnel is formed by the carpal bones and lies beneath the transverse carpal ligament, housing nine tendon sheaths of the forearm flexors along with the median nerve. From a clinical perspective, individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome typically experience sensory symptoms such as paresthesia and hypoesthesia, as well as motor impairments and pain within the region supplied by the median nerve, all resulting from mechanical compression and localized ischemia.

In the classification of CTS, participants are diagnosed with mild, moderate, or severe CTS, and various treatment options are available for each category. Treatment options aimed at alleviating symptoms include physical therapy, splinting, wrist injections, and surgical procedures Ultrasound-guided injections of peripheral nerves are typically more advantageous than blind injections because minimize the risk of damaging crucial vascular structures in the adjacent tissue alongside the nerves and decrease the likelihood of intraneural injections.

CTS can also be treated surgically, although the literature has not provided sufficient evidence to establish the superiority of one surgical technique over another. However, these procedures are known to be effective by reducing the volume of the carpal tunnel, thereby relieving pressure on the median nerve. In CTS surgery, following a mini-incision, the dissection proceeds through fat and fascial tissue until the flexor retinaculum is reached, ensuring decompression of the median nerve. The advantages of the mini-incision technique include the preservation of neurovascular structures, a low risk of complications, and a high level of patient satisfaction, making it a prominent surgical approach.

The aim of this study is to compare ultrasound-guided perineural injection of the median nerve with the classic minimal incision surgical technique for median nerve decompression in participants diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe carpal tunnel syndrome.

Interventions

  • Procedure Minimal Incision Surgery for median nerve decompression
    Classic minimal incision surgical technique for median nerve decompression in patients diagnosed with mild, moderate, and severe carpal tunnel syndrome.
  • Procedure Ultrasound-guided perineural injection with 5 cc 5% Dextrose
    The median nerve will be identified using ultrasound at the proximal entrance of the carpal tunnel. Using an ulnar approach with the in-plane technique, it was planned to inject 5 cc of 5% dextrose around the median nerve.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change from baseline visual analog scale (VAS) wrist pain at 4th and 12th week [Time frame: baseline and 12th week]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Change from baseline Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) at 4th and 12th week [Time frame: baseline and 12th week]
  • Change from baseline Cross-sectional area of the Median Nerve (CSA) at 4th and 12th week [Time frame: baseline and 12th week]
  • Change from baseline Electrophysiological Evaluation at 4th and 12th week [Time frame: baseline and 12th week]
  • Change from baseline Hand Grip Strength Assessment at 4th and 12th week [Time frame: baseline and 12th week]
  • Change from baseline Finger Grip Strength Assessment at 4th and 12th week [Time frame: baseline and 12th week]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • The presence of symptoms such as nocturnal, posture-related, or movement-related paresthesias, along with possible pain, in the area supplied by the median nerve in the hand, lasting for more than 3 months.
  • Confirmation of mild, moderate or severe CTS through electrophysiological testing.
  • Numbness and loss of sensation in the hand's regions innervated by the median nerve, as well as weakness in the thenar muscles innervated by the median nerve.
  • Positive results on either the Phalen test and/or Tinel sign.

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals who may exhibit symptoms mimicking carpal tunnel syndrome, such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, or thoracic outlet syndrome.
  • Patients who have received a previous injection into the carpal tunnel within the past 6 months.
  • Thenar muscle atrophy.
  • A history of prior carpal tunnel surgery.
  • Regular usage of systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids.
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, gout, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, or polymyositis.
  • Malignancy.
  • Active infections

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Turkey (Türkiye) · 1 center
  • Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University — Afyonkarahisar

Publications

  • Lam KHS, Wu YT, Reeves KD, Galluccio F, Allam AE, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-Guided Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;13(6):1138. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061138. PMID 36980446
  • Lin MT, Liu IC, Syu WT, Kuo PL, Wu CH. Effect of Perineural Injection with Different Dextrose Volumes on Median Nerve Size, Elasticity and Mobility in Hands with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 9;11(5):849. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050849. PMID 34065073
  • Pace V, Marzano F, Placella G. Update on surgical procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome: What is the current evidence and practice? What are the future research directions? World J Orthop. 2023 Jan 18;14(1):6-12. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i1.6. eCollection 2023 Jan 18. PMID 36686281

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06243848 · CTSHDvsOP

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗