Menu
Recruiting NCT06238063

Implementing a Nurse-led Advance Care Planning (ACP) Intervention in Residential Care Homes

No phase Interventional Advanced Care Planning

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Nurse-led Advance Care Planning (ACP) Intervention.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Advanced Care Planning. Basic parameters: from 65 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Hong Kong
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Implementing a Nurse-led Advance Care Planning (ACP) Intervention to Improve ACP Uptake in Residential Care Homes: An Implementation Science and Mixed Methods Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

The goal of this cluster randomized controlled trial is to examine the effectiveness of a nurse-led advance care planning (ACP) intervention on improving ACP discussion uptake in residential care homes (RCHs). The main question it aims to answer is: The effectiveness of nurse-led advance care planning (ACP) interventions implemented on eligible residents in residential care homes on improving ACP discussion uptake in this population. Compared to participants in the control group who will only receive usual care with no ACP intervention, residents and their family members in the intervention group will be invited to attend the ICP meeting with ACP discussion. The ACP discussion will be guided by the established protocol, which was developed by the expert panel and delivered by trained nurses.

Detailed description

Targeted issue: The lack of ACP discussion and poor dyadic congruence pose challenges to the provision of good EOL care in Hong Kong RCHs.

Population: RCHs in Hong Kong with nurse-to-resident ratios ≥1:3 will be targeted to ensure adequate staffing to carry out ACP. Eligible participants have to be age 65 or older and be able to communicate in Cantonese or Mandarin. Participants will also be invited to identify family members involved in making decisions about their care to participate in the intervention.

Intervention: a nurse-led advance care planning (ACP) intervention

Main study aim: To implement a nurse-led ACP intervention for improving ACP uptake in RCH residents in Hong Kong to bridge the evidence-practice gap.

Study method: This implementation science study will use a mixed methods approach, including a pair-matched cluster-RCT and qualitative interviews, and relevant outcomes will be followed for up to 2 years. RCHs will be randomized into two groups: a nurse-led ACP intervention group and a control group with usual care only.The ACP documentation (i.e., new documentation related to ACP and EOL care) in medical records of all RCH residents in the intervention and control groups will be audited by the research team at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1; after the ACP intervention), 1-year follow-up (T2; 1 year after the launch of the ACP intervention at the RCH), and 2-year follow-up (T3; 2 years after the launch of the ACP intervention at the RCH).

Interventions

  • Behavioral Nurse-led Advance Care Planning (ACP) Intervention
    An ACP discussion between the participating resident, family members, and the trained nurse will be incorporated into the annual review. The proposed ACP intervention will be divided into three parts (three weekly sessions, 1.5 hours each): 1) preparatory, 2) discussion, and 3) follow-up sessions.

Primary outcome measures

  • Change from Baseline in Chart review at post-intervention [Time frame: baseline and immediately after the intervention]
  • Change from Baseline in Chart review at 1-year follow-up time point. [Time frame: 1-year follow-up (i.e., 1 year after the launch of the ACP intervention)]
  • Change from Baseline in Chart review at 2-year follow-up time point. [Time frame: 2-year follow-up (i.e., 2 years after the launch of the ACP intervention at the RCH).]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligible participants have to be age 65 or older and be able to communicate in Cantonese or Mandarin.
  • Participants will also be invited to identify family members involved in making decisions about their care to participate in the intervention. For residents who have moderate or severe cognitive impairment (as determined by a score of less than 19 in the Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment), the participation of family members is mandatory.

Exclusion criteria

  • They have a moderate or severe significant cognitive impairment but do not have family members, or
  • They have prior ACP experience (e.g., AD completed).

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Supportive care

Study locations

Hong Kong · 1 center
  • The University of Hong Kong — Hong Kong

Publications

  • Wang T, Cheung DST, Chu C, Chen J, Lin CC. Evaluation of a train-the-trainer implementation strategy on providers' competency, opportunity and motivation for advance care planning in residential care homes: a mixed-methods study. BMC Geriatr. 2026 Jan 3;26(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06898-2. PMID 41484702

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06238063 · UW 22-021

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗