1HP Versus 3HR in the Treatment of Tuberculosis Infection in Vietnam
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: Isoniazid, Rifapentine, Rifampicin.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: Tuberculosis Infection. Basic parameters: from 18 years · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- Vietnam
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
An Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial of the New One-month Regimen Versus the Current Three-month Regimen for the Treatment of Tuberculosis Infection in Vietnam
Overview
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) infection is a key driver of the TB pandemic, with over 10.6 million people fell ill with TB disease in 2022. About one-quarter of the global population is estimated to be infected with TB bacteria. Around 5-10% of people with TB infection will develop active and contagious TB disease, which could be largely avoided if TB infection is identified and given effective preventative treatment, before progression to active disease. The long treatment of TB infection with regimens lasting from three to nine months is a significant barrier to treatment completion in individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of TB infection. Adapting a shorter regimen than the current regimens could lead to a higher treatment completion rate and increased uptake of preventative therapy for TB, as well as reduced side effects. Methods and analysis: An open-label, randomized clinical trial (1:1) will be performed in two study sites in Ha Noi, Vietnam (Vietnam National Lung Hospital and Ha Noi Lung Hospital). Adult household contacts (n=350) of people with new, bacteriologically-confirmed, pulmonary, drug-susceptible TB who initiate treatment will be invited to participate. Aim: To compare the TB preventive therapy completion rates and adverse event incidence between a new one-month regimen (1HP) versus the current three-month regimen (3HR)\*. \*1HP= one month of daily isoniazid (H/INH) and rifapentine (P/RPT) 3HR= three months of daily isoniazid (H/INH) and rifampicin (R/RIF)
Detailed description
Latent TB infection, hereafter referred to as TB infection, is a key driver of the TB pandemic. Over 10.6 million people developed active TB in 2022 and about one-quarter of the global population is estimated to be infected with TB bacteria, meaning approximately two billion people are affected worldwide. On average, 5-10% of people with TB infection will develop active TB, usually within the first five years after their initial TB infection. Therefore, preventative treatment is a fundamental component of a comprehensive strategy to end TB.
The current duration of TB Prevention Treatment (TPT), which lasts from three to nine months, is a significant barrier resulting in the low uptake of the TPT.
A one-month TPT regimen using two drugs (isoniazid and rifapentine, 1HP) was proven effective and had higher completion rates for people living with HIV; however, the initial demonstration trial was not performed in a cohort of people without HIV. The use of a shorter TPT regimen than the current three-month TPT regimen could lead to higher completion rates and increased uptake among a large number of individuals in need of TPT. Moreover, it may potentially reduce adverse events as well as decrease the medical and non-medical costs associated with the TPT.
Therefore, the investigators propose a comprehensive study of shortened TPT for TB infection in Vietnam, a low HIV burden setting.
An open-label, randomized controlled trial (TBIshort) of the new one-month TPT regimen versus the current three-month regimen for the treatment of TB infection in Vietnam will be performed and funded by Stop TB Partnership's TB REACH initiative to compare treatment completion rate and safety between the two regimens. Households will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the two arms using cluster randomization. All participants from the same household will be allocated to the same treatment regimen arm. The proposed study will address key knowledge gaps, and provide objective evidence to guide decision-making for the use of the 1HP regimen for the treatment of TB infection in a low HIV burden setting.
Aims
1. Main objective:
Objective 1: Compare the treatment adherence and safety of the 1HP regimen and the standard 3HR regimen for TB infection treatment 2. Specific objectives:
Objective 2: Compare the treatment completion rates for TB infection between 1HP and 3HR regimens.
Objective 3: Compare adverse events incidence for 1HP and 3HR regimens during three months from treatment start.
Interventions
- Drug Isoniazid
This randomized control trial will compare the treatment adherence and safety of the 1HP (Arm B) regimen and standard 3HR (Arm A) regimens for TB infection treatment - Drug Rifapentine
This randomized control trial will compare the treatment adherence and safety of the 1HP (Arm B) regimen and standard 3HR (Arm A) regimens for TB infection treatment - Drug Rifampicin
This randomized control trial will compare the treatment adherence and safety of the 1HP (Arm B) regimen and standard 3HR (Arm A) regimens for TB infection treatment
Primary outcome measures
- 1. % Adequate adherence in each arm [Time frame: From study entry at Week 0 through up to 16 weeks of 3HR (Arm A), or up to 6 weeks of 1HP (Arm B), to be reported at the end of the trial.]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- The incidence rate of severe adverse events among two arms. [Time frame: From study entry at Week 0 through up to 16 weeks of 3HR (Arm A), or up to 6 weeks of 1HP (Arm B)]
- Comparison of adherence measured as the proportion of treatment taken in the regimens (1HP vs 3HR). [Time frame: From study entry at Week 0 through up to 16 weeks of 3HR (Arm A), or up to 6 weeks of 1HP (Arm B)]
- The incidence rate of a targeted event of grade 3,4 or 5*** and one grade increase from the baseline among two arms. [Time frame: From study entry at Week 0 through up to 16 weeks of 3HR (Arm A), or up to 6 weeks of 1HP (Arm B)]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Household contacts of people with new, bacteriologically-confirmed, pulmonary, drug-susceptible TB who initiated treatment with residence in the intervention areas;
- Positive QFT-Plus or TST results (TST induration of at least 5mm)
- Agree to remain in contact and provide updated information as necessary, and have no current plans to relocate outside the designed area for the duration of the study;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Capable of providing signed informed consent;
- Willing to participate in the study visits and procedures
Exclusion criteria
- Indeterminate results on QFT-Plus;
- Clinical or radiographic suspicions or history of previous active TB;
- Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any components of the regimens;
- Weight \<30kg;
- Acute or chronic liver failure with elevated liver enzymes or evidence of liver dysfunction such as jaundice or a history of liver failure caused by isoniazid or rifampicin; History of liver cirrhosis at any time before study entry;
- Infection with suspected or confirmed tuberculosis strains resistant to isoniazid or rifampicin;
- Porphyria- Porphyrin metabolism disorder;
- Polyneuropathy (self-reported/ confirmed);
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant within 120 days of enrollment;
- Any other severe underlying condition that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or outcome in the trial;
- Participation in other clinical intervention trials or research protocols (participation in other studies that do not involve an intervention may be allowed, but this must be discussed and approved by the Chief Investigator).
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: No
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Parallel assignment
- Masking
- Open label
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Study locations
Vietnam · 2 centers
- Vietnam National Lung Hospital — Hanoi
- Ha Noi Lung Hospital — Hà Nội
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06191692 · TBIshort