Menu
Recruiting NCT06162767

Cancer of Esophagogastric Junction: Optimized Sweet Versus Ivor-Lewis

No phase Interventional Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Esophagectomy by Ivor-Lewis Procedure, Esophagectomy by Optimized Sweet Procedure.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
China
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized Controlled Study of Optimized Sweet Procedure Versus Ivor-Lewis Procedure Esophagectomy in Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction

Overview

This study is being done to see whether Optimized Sweet Procedure is superior than the Ivor-Lewis Procedure Esophagectomy with better long-term outcome and acceptable postoperative short-term outcome or not.

Detailed description

Esophagogastric junction carcinoma is a prevalent malignancy within the human digestive system, ranking as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Current national and international guidelines advocate for a comprehensive approach primarily centered around surgical intervention for the management of esophagogastric junction carcinoma. This preference stems from the fact that lymph node metastasis in such patients can occur simultaneously in the abdominal region and the lower mediastinum. Consequently, conventional options like the Ivor Lewis and Sweet procedures are routinely recommended due to their capability to encompass tumor resection, margin clearance, and lymph node dissection. However, traditional Sweet procedures are associated with higher surgical trauma and increased postoperative complications. With the evolution of single-incision thoracoscopy, we have leveraged the advantages of minimally invasive techniques and innovatively devised an Optimized "totally thoracoscopic Sweet procedure".In this study, a randomized controlled trial will enroll 240 patients diagnosed with esophagogastric junction carcinoma to compare the therapeutic efficacy between the Optimized Sweet Procedure and the Ivor-Lewis Procedure. Postoperative follow-ups will be conducted to analyze pre-discharge indicators and five-year postoperative outcomes, examining the correlation between the two surgical procedures in terms of postoperative quality of life, mortality rates, and survival rates, aiming to explore whether the Optimized Sweet Procedure is superior to the Ivor-Lewis Procedure Esophagectomy.

Interventions

  • Procedure Esophagectomy by Ivor-Lewis Procedure
    Esophagectomy was conducted by Ivor-Lewis Procedure.
  • Procedure Esophagectomy by Optimized Sweet Procedure
    Esophagectomy was conducted by Optimized Sweet Procedure.

Primary outcome measures

  • Disease Free Survival [Time frame: 5 years]
Secondary outcome measures (4)
  • Overall survival [Time frame: 5 years]
  • Postoperative morbidity [Time frame: 3 years]
  • Postoperative mortality [Time frame: 3 years]
  • locoregional recurrence [Time frame: 5 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Preoperative diagnosis confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy showing an Esophagogastric junction mass, with histopathological confirmation of malignancy, specifically Siewert Type II;
  • Preoperative blood pressure controlled below 160/100 mmHg, blood glucose levels within 5.6 to 11.2 mmol/L, and normal functioning of major organs such as heart, lungs, liver, and kidneys. Main criteria include a Goldman cardiac risk index of grade 1 or 2; pulmonary function tests indicating predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) > 40%, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) ≥ 40%; total bilirubin < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal; Alanine amioTransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Transaminase (AST) < 2.5 times the upper limit of normal; creatinine ≤ 1.25 times the upper limit of normal and creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min;
  • Enhanced thin-slice CT scan of the thorax and abdomen showing a tumor with a maximum diameter not exceeding 5 cm, and lymph nodes in the thorax and abdomen with a short diameter not exceeding 1 cm, clinically staged as CT1-2N0-1M0 (8th edition JACC staging);
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of 0-1;
  • All relevant examinations completed within 14 days before surgery;
  • Patients capable of understanding the study and providing informed consent by signing the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who have undergone prior anti-tumor therapy (such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, etc.) before surgery; individuals with a history of other malignancies; patients presenting with secondary primary cancer at the time of enrollment; those with a history of prior unilateral thoracic or abdominal major surgeries; pregnant or lactating women; individuals with interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, or severe emphysema; uncontrolled infections; severe mental illness; and those with a history of severe heart disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or angina attacks within the last six months.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

China · 1 center
  • Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School — Nanjing

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06162767 · 2023-186-02

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗