Menu
Recruiting NCT06152406

Ablate and Pace HIS Study

No phase Interventional HIS Bundle Pacing Atrial Fibrillation

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Ablation and Pacemaker Implantation.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: HIS Bundle Pacing, Atrial Fibrillation. Basic parameters: 18 years — 100 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Kingdom
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Safety and Efficacy of Distal His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing AV Node Ablation With Evidence of Heart Failure, a Randomised Control Study

Overview

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and estimates suggest its prevalence is increasing. Despite the advances in AF ablation strategies, the outcome of ablation procedures in persistent AF is still unsatisfactory. In addition, many patients are not candidates for ablation due to advanced age, comorbidities and previous failed ablation procedures. It is well known that there is no mortality benefit from rhythm versus rate control strategy in AF, therefore the increased number of AV node ablation and pacemaker insertion for patients with symptomatic AF with uncontrolled heart rate. Following AV node ablation, it is understandable that these patients will be paced 100% of the time where the value of physiological pacing will be at its most. The current standard practice is to pace the right ventricle for this cohort of patients unless they have severe LV systolic dysfunction when a biventricular pacing might be recommended. Previous data showed that RV pacing only can lead to deterioration of LV function, worsening of heart failure symptoms and increased mortality. HIS bundle pacing is a novel technique of pacing through placing the pacemaker lead on the junction box between the top and bottom chamber of the heart. This will allow the utilisation of the normal/intrinsic HIS Purkinjie (eclectic cables) to stimulate the ventricles. This can offer a physiological pacing modality and reduce pacing induced cardiomyopathy specially in pacing dependent pacing. The Ablate and Pace HIS Study proposes that the new method of HIS pacing is safe, effective and superior to the existing method of RV pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation who demonstrate signs of heart failure.

Detailed description

The Ablate and Pace HIS Study is a single-centre, prospective randomised single-blinded study, recruiting a sub-population of patients with AF who are deemed not fit for rhythm control strategy. These patients have been referred for a pacemaker implant and AVN node ablation as a symptomatic rate control option.

The study aims to randomise a total of 100 participants into either the RV only pacing arm or the HBP arm. All patients will be implanted with a pacemaker device with one lead positioned in the right ventricle, and only in the HBP arm will an additional lead be positioned on the distal HIS bundle in order to obtain direct HIS-bundle capture. The RV lead will be only be used as a back-up option for the HBP arm if needed.

Participants will undergo AVN ablation either at the same setting or 4-6 weeks later according to clinical indication and operator preference. A double-blinded design will then be employed to investigate the effect of HIS pacing. Endpoint measurements will be taken at Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post randomisation. Treatment allocation will be blinded to the patients and endpoint assessor. All participants will be informed of their allocated treatment arm at the end of their 12 month follow up visit.

Funding has been provided by Medtronic. The study Sponsor is University Hospitals of Leicester.

Interventions

  • Procedure Ablation and Pacemaker Implantation
    All patients will be implanted with a pacemaker device with one lead positioned in right ventricle (control arm only) and an additional lead will be positioned on the distal (ventricular) HIS bundle if in intervention arm. All patients will undergo ablation.

Primary outcome measures

  • Number of participants with 20% improvement in 6 minutes-walk distance, AFEQT questionnaire score, and number of steps and distance walked per day assessed by a Fitbit smart watch [Time frame: 12 months]
Secondary outcome measures (6)
  • Improvement of LV function, LVESV assessed by echocardiogram [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Change in NT-ProBNP level [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Incidence of hospitalisation for heart failure, need for device upgrade to biventricular pacemaker or mortality [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Pacing parameters [Time frame: 12 months]
  • Fluoroscopy time during the device insertion [Time frame: During device insertion]
  • Safety consideration: rate of infection, lead failure, displacement or the need for a repeat procedure [Time frame: 12 months]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 or above
  • Symptomatic AF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV
  • Willing to consent for the study
  • AF regardless type, deemed not suitable for rhythm control strategy that has been referred for AVN ablation with one of the following:
  • Impaired LV function, EF <50 %. And or
  • Raised N-Terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide ( NT-ProBNP) >365 ng/L

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient who has already got a pacemaker in situ
  • Known severe LVSD when biventricular device is the thought to be the preferred pacing modality
  • Females in child bearing period
  • Lack of capacity to consent
  • Other serious medical condition with life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Less than 18 years
  • Unwilling to consent for the study

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United Kingdom · 1 center
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust — Leicester

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06152406 · 153856

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗