Menu
Recruiting NCT06141187

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Vs. Sham for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Focusing on Pain and Economy.

No phase Interventional Osteoporotic Fractures Vertebral Fracture

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Vertebroplasty, Sham Vertebroplasty.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Osteoporotic Fractures, Vertebral Fracture. Basic parameters: from 50 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Denmark
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Vs. Sham for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Focusing on Pain and Economy: a Single-center, Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview

The purpose of this randomized double-blind clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in relieving severe pain in patients with MRI-verified acute or sub-acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) compared to sham as well as examine the socio-economic implications associated with performing vertebroplasty. The primary outcome is improvement of pain intensity as measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0 to100) 12 weeks after treatment. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported back-related disability, patient-reported quality of life, spinal sagittal balance, complications associated with the procedure, incidence of new OVCFs and socioeconomic costs.

Detailed description

The study design is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial where patients are stratified into either involvement of 1-2 vertebral levels or 3-4 levels and randomized to either vertebroplasty or a sham operation. The trial is designed in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines.

Patients will be examined in the outpatient clinic at the Center for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark. MRI scans and X-ray images will be performed at the radiology department at the hospital. Experienced neuro-radiologists carry out image analyses.

Spine surgeons who are experienced in PVP will perform the surgical procedures. Anaesthesiologists and spine surgeons are present at the facility in case of complications, following recommendations by the National Health Authority and have the capacity/capability to decompress the spinal canal in case of cement leakage.

Study subjects will be recruited from patients diagnosed with painful x-ray verified vertebral compression fractures in the Region of southern Denmark. The patients will be identified and referred to the trial site by the patients' general practitioner, chiropractor, physiotherapist, or from hospital inpatient and emergency departments in the region of Southern Denmark.

Subjects will initially be stratified into two groups based on the number of OVCFs into 1-2 levels or 3-4 levels. Within each of these two groups, randomization sheets in varying blocks of 8 with an equal number of PVP and sham patients in each block will be generated using software (www.randomizer.org) and will be placed in numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Treatment group assignment will be performed by a scrub nurse in the surgical theatre after the patient is draped but prior to skin incision. Throughout the trial, only the surgeon and the OR-nurse will have knowledge of the treatment assignment. The patient and all assessors remain blinded to the treatment group throughout the study.

During hospitalization, perioperative data on operation time, theater time and complications will be collected from the operating room staff during surgery. Upon discharge, length of stay will be recorded for each patient. After discharge, all visits to the outpatient clinic, either to the surgeon, nurse or physiotherapist as well as phone calls with questions regarding their procedure to the surgical nurse and time spent will be recorded.

Patients will be seen in the clinic for evaluation at 4, 12, and 52 weeks after treatment. MRI and full-standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs will be taken at the 12-week follow-up time point. This will allow for identification of any healing at the index level as well as any new-onset OVCFs.

Treatment effectiveness analyses of the randomized trial data will performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Enrolled patients and outcome assessors will remain blinded for the duration of the trial. The 12-week follow-up will be the primary endpoint.

Interventions

  • Procedure Vertebroplasty
    PVP
  • Procedure Sham Vertebroplasty
    Sham PVP

Primary outcome measures

  • Pain intensity using the 100-point VAS [Time frame: VAS will be recorded at time of randomization and after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 days, and after 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks, and finally at 12 months and 24 months post-randomization]
Secondary outcome measures (5)
  • Patient-reported disability. [Time frame: Recorded at enrolment and at 4 and 12 weeks, 12 and 24 months post-randomization]
  • Health-related quality of life. [Time frame: Recorded at enrolment and at 4 and 12 weeks, 12 and 24 months post-randomization]
  • Global Perceived Effect scale [Time frame: Recorded at 4 and 12 weeks, 12 and 24 months post-randomization]
  • Sagittal balance [Time frame: Recorded at enrolment and 12 months post-randomization]
  • Societal costs of treatment [Time frame: Recorded 1 day at discharge and 12 months post-randomization]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 50+ and diagnosed with symptomatic osteoporotic spinal compression fractures between T6 and L5 (incl).
  • Focal tenderness on the level of the vertebral fracture.
  • Fractures verified with oedema of the relevant vertebra on the MRI STIR sequence
  • Osteoporotic Fractures type 1-4.
  • Fracture involves no more than 4 vertebral body levels.
  • PVP can be done in one session.
  • Back pain score measured on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0 to 100) ≥ 60.
  • Able to understand and read Danish.
  • Written informed consent.
  • Relevant pain started ≤ 3 months prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

  • \- Contra-indications for spine surgery.
  • Platelets < 30 mia/l.
  • Osteoporotic Fractures type 5 and Pincer-type.
  • Complete collapse of the vertebral body precluding insertion of needle.
  • Presence of neurologic deficit.
  • Contraindications for MRI scanning.
  • Psychological or psychiatric disorder that is expected to interfere with compliance.
  • Active malignancy.
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) test score below 24.
  • History of chronic back pain requiring ongoing opiate use.
  • Systemic or local infection of the spine.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Denmark · 1 center
  • Rygcenter Syddanmark — Middelfart

Publications

  • Andersen MO, Andresen AK, Hartvigsen J, Hermann AP, Sorensen J, Carreon LY. Vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a protocol for a single-center doubled-blind randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. VOPE2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 30;19(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05301-x. PMID 39614265

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06141187 · MS/KIR 012/2023

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗