Menu
Recruiting NCT06095440

A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes in Patients With Hepatorenal Syndrome at Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Observational Hepatorenal Syndrome

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Hepatorenal Syndrome outcome in Patients at Methodist Health systems.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Hepatorenal Syndrome. Basic parameters: 18 years — 85 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →

Overview

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with liver disease \[1\]. Increased activity and presence of vasodilators such as nitric oxide in cirrhotic patients leads to vasodilation, especially in the splanchnic circulation, resulting in hemodynamic changes that precipitate renal injury \[1\]. Patients may present with elevated serum creatinine (Cr), benign urine sediment, and low urine sodium \[1\].

Detailed description

There are two main classifications of HRS: HRS-AKI (previously known as type 1 HRS) and diuretic-resistant ascites (previously known as type 2 HRS) \[1\].

The ultimate treatment for patients with HRS is to improve hepatic function via treatment of underlying etiology or liver transplantation; however, this is not always immediately possible due to the high demand for liver transplantation among other factors \[1\]. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can also be considered, especially in patients with severe electrolyte derangements such as hypokalemia or pulmonary edema, that are not responding to medical therapy \[1\]. Often, CRRT is used as a bridging therapy to stabilize patients until they are optimized for receiving a liver transplant \[1, 2\]. CRRT, however, comes with its own risks and disadvantages such as hypotension and increased risk of cardiac adverse events \[2\]. In certain cases, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) can benefit patients with HRS by reducing portal pressure resulting in increase in renal perfusion \[1\].

Interventions

  • Other Hepatorenal Syndrome outcome in Patients at Methodist Health systems
    1.2.1. To perform a retrospective analysis of patients with HRS with the aim of comparing various treatment modalities such as vasoconstrictors, albumin, CRRT, Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS), and TIPS.

Primary outcome measures

  • Primary Outcome for HRS-AKI patients [Time frame: 4 years]
Secondary outcome measures (1)
  • post transplant mortality rates [Time frame: 4 years]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients >18 years old that were hospitalized between April 1st 2019 and April 1st 2023 who either presented with HRS-AKI or developed a diagnosis of HRS during the hospital course. HRS-AKI will be defined based on the ICA criteria, described below:
  • Presence of cirrhosis, acute liver failure, or acute-on-chronic liver failure
  • An increase in serum Cr of ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or ≥50% from baseline value and/or urinary output ≤0.5 mL/kg of body weight for ≥6 hours (requires use of a urinary catheter)
  • No full or partial response for ≥2 days of diuretic withdrawal and volume expansion with albumin (dosed at 1 g/kg of body weight/day)
  • Absence of shock
  • No current or recent treatment with nephrotoxic drugs
  • Absence of parenchymal renal disease
  • Suggestion of renal vasoconstriction based on FENa <0.2%

Exclusion criteria

  • 1\. HRS-AKI patients <18 years of age 2. All patients hospitalized between April 1st 2019 and April 1st 2023 without a diagnosis of HRS-AKI.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Observational model
Cohort

Study locations

United States · 1 center
  • Liver Institute of Methodist Dallas Medical Center — Dallas

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06095440 · 020.HEP.2023.D

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗