Multicenter Clinical Translational Study of "ICU-NO CRBSI" Based on Improvement Science
For patients and families
In plain language
An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.
- What is being studied
- The protocol lists: evidence-based intervention Plan for the Prevention of CRBSI in ICU patients.
- Who it may be relevant to
- Registry conditions: CRBSI - Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection, Evidence-based Nursing Practice, Central Venous Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection, Central Venous Catheter Associated Bloodstream Infection. Basic parameters: No limits · All.
- What needs checking
- Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
- Where it takes place
- China
- Next step
- Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Unsure about the terms? Read our patient guide →
Official title
A Multicenter Clinical Translational Study of "ICU-NO CRBSI" Based on Improvement Science in China
Overview
The goal of this type of study is to construct the continuous quality promotion project "ICU-NO CRBSI(Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection , CRBSI)" based on improvement science, and to verify its effect in the prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and continuous quality improvement in ICU ( Intensive Care Unit , ICU) through multi-center implementation and two rounds of improvement. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: What is the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in the ICU of participating units? How compliant are health care providers in the ICU with evidence-based sensory control practices for the prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infection? Participants will be provided with the hospital's routine CVC (Central Venous Catheter ,CVC) care practices and CVC quality improvement measures based on evidence-based guidelines What technical and cultural support is needed to implement quality and safety improvement measures?
Detailed description
A multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted to verify the effect of the intervention scheme and the improvement strategy.
A continuous sample was taken based on subjects that met the inclusion criteria. This study was a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial involving 23 research centers/medical institutions, including the Evidence-Based Nursing Center of Fudan University and Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University. Co-led by the Pediatric Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, a total of 23,000 catheter days (about 8050 people) were included, and each center planned to include 1,000 catheter days (about 350 people). Patients admitted to ICU from October to December 2023 were taken as baseline study objects, and ICU patients from January to March 2024 were entered into the control phase of the study experiment. ICU patients from April 2024 to June 2024 were included in the continuous observation group, and from July 2024 to September 2024 were included in the continuous observation period.
According to the study design characteristics, the intervention will be performed on the control group after the randomized controlled trial phase and the sustainability of the initial intervention group after 3 months will be assessed. The intervention group started in January 2024, implemented the validated intervention protocol and quality promotion implementation strategy, and entered the second phase three months later (April 2024), and the control group became the second intervention group after the intervention in April 2024. In Phase I (the randomized controlled trial phase, January 2024 to March 2024), the effect of the intervention and the improvement strategy was examined by comparing the change in BSI at baseline between the two groups. The control group started the intervention (January 2024) and began reporting bloodstream infection data. In the second phase (April 2024 to June 2024), both groups received the intervention and were followed up until September 2024. Therefore, it is possible to observe the first intervention group for 9 months and also to verify whether the results of the second intervention group (the phase I control group) can be replicated.
Control group: According to hospital catheterization, maintenance and central venous catheter extraction routine care.
Intervention group: On the basis of routine care, the "evidence-based intervention Program for the Prevention of Catheter Related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in ICU patients" was implemented for intervention.
Primary outcome: incidence of CRBSI, ratio of CRBSI incidence (quarterly comparison) Secondary outcome :length of stay in ICU, BSI-related mortality in ICU, hospitalization cost in ICU, knowledge and practice score of adherence to evidence-based sensory control in ICU, adherence to evidence-based practice of central venous catheter placement, maintenance and extubation.
Interventions
- Behavioral evidence-based intervention Plan for the Prevention of CRBSI in ICU patients
On the basis of routine nursing, the "evidence-based intervention Plan for the Prevention of CRBSI in ICU patients" was implemented for intervention.
Primary outcome measures
- Incidence of CRBSI [Time frame: 1year]
- CRBSI incidence ratio [Time frame: 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
- Length of ICU stay [Time frame: 1 year]
- Related Mortality [Time frame: 1 year]
- ICU hospitalization cost [Time frame: 1 year]
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- ICU stay over 48 hours
- CVC was placed for more than 24 hours
Exclusion criteria
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with a history of CRBSI infection
- Patients with central venous catheterization were brought in from other hospitals
Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
Study locations
China · 1 center
- ZhongShan Hospital Affilicated to Fudan University — Shanghai
Publications
- Peng S, Lu Y. Clinical epidemiology of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit in China. J Crit Care. 2013 Jun;28(3):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Dec 21. PMID 23265289
- Lindgren S, Pikwer A, Ricksten SE, Akeson J. Survey of central venous catheterisation practice in Sweden. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Nov;57(10):1237-44. doi: 10.1111/aas.12190. Epub 2013 Sep 16. PMID 24102163
- Govindan S, Jobe A, O'Malley ME, Flanders SA, Chopra V. To PICC or not to PICC? A cross-sectional survey of vascular access practices in the ICU. J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 20. PMID 33652363
- Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, Marque S, Thuong M, Pottier V, Ramakers M, Savary B, Seguin A, Valette X, Terzi N, Sauneuf B, Cattoir V, Mermel LA, du Cheyron D; 3SITES Study Group. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1220-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500964. PMID 26398070
- O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):e162-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257. Epub 2011 Apr 1. No abstract availab PMID 21460264
- Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Mehta Y, Leblebicioglu H, Memish ZA, Al-Mousa HH, Balkhy H, Hu B, Alvarez-Moreno C, Medeiros EA, Apisarnthanarak A, Raka L, Cuellar LE, Ahmed A, Navoa-Ng JA, El-Kholy AA, Kanj SS, Bat-Erdene I, Duszynska W, Van Truong N, Pazmino LN, See-Lum LC, Fernandez-Hidalgo R, Di-Silvestre G, Zand F, Hlinkova S, Belskiy V, Al-Rahma H, Luque-Torres MT, Bayraktar N, Mitrev Z, Gurskis V, F PMID 25179325
- Granger BB. Science of Improvement Versus Science of Implementation: Integrating Both Into Clinical Inquiry. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2018 Summer;29(2):208-212. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2018757. No abstract available. PMID 29875118
- Koczwara B, Stover AM, Davies L, Davis MM, Fleisher L, Ramanadhan S, Schroeck FR, Zullig LL, Chambers DA, Proctor E. Harnessing the Synergy Between Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer: A Call to Action. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Jun;14(6):335-340. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00083. Epub 2018 May 14. No abstract available. PMID 29750579
Identifiers
NCT: NCT06085690 · B2023-212R