Menu
Recruiting NCT06075004

Total Periarticular Infiltration Vs Posterior Periarticular Infiltration Plus PENG Block for Hip Analgesia

No phase Interventional Hip Osteoarthritis Postoperative Pain

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration, Posterior Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration plus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Hip Osteoarthritis, Postoperative Pain. Basic parameters: 18 years — 80 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
Chile
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

A Randomized Comparison Between Total Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration and Partial Posterior Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration Plus Low Volume Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Total Hip Replacement Analgesia

Overview

In a recent study, direct periarticular local anesthetic infiltration (PAI) showed a greater incidence of early quadriceps weakness (33% at 3 hours and 13% at 6 hours) than pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) but, in turn, demonstrated a statistically significant better pain control. Additionally, PENGB could not completely circumvent motor compromise either, particularly at 3 hours (20% incidence), probably secondary to an injectate migration towards the femoral nerve. Posteriorly to this publication, a cadaveric trial looking into the maximum effective volume that spared the femoral nerve resulted in 13.2 mL. This newer evidence led to the design of a strategy that combines both interventions, aiming to obtain the best of them and have a solid alternative for those cases where very early mobilization is pursued. Thus, it is hypothesized that posterior PAI added to a low-volume PENGB (10mL) represents a superior alternative to PAI in terms of strength preservation and provides effective analgesia during the first 24 postoperative hours after THA.

Detailed description

Patients who agree to participate in the protocol will be assigned to one group or another (PAI or posterior PAI+PENGB) through computationally generated block randomization. Outcome assessors blinded to randomization will perform all measurements.

All trial interventions (PAI or posterior PAI+PENGB) will be performed (or supervised) by one of the co-authors, an expert orthopedic surgeon anesthesiologist. Both interventions will be executed in the operating room, on the surgical table, under sedation, and with the barrier that separates the surgical field from the cranial area of the patient to keep the latter blind to the technique received.

All patients will undergo spinal anesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine (10mg) plus 20 μg of fentanyl. Both groups will also receive tranexamic acid 1g intravenous (IV), ketoprofen 100mg IV, and acetaminophen 1gr IV. Propofol sedation guided with a targeted controlled infusion (TCI) model will be administered in order to obtain an adequate level of sedation.

All surgeries will be conducted by the same team of surgeons, performing a posterior approach technique in the lateral decubitus position.

In the recovery room, all patients will receive patient-controlled analgesia (morphine bolus = 1 mg; lockout interval = 8 minutes). On the surgical ward, all subjects will continue to receive acetaminophen (1 g per os every 6 hours), ketoprofen (100 mg per os every 8 hours) as well and patient-controlled analgesia (morphine bolus = 1 mg IV; lockout interval = 8 minutes).

Interventions

  • Procedure Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration
    Sixty milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine + 5ug/mL epinephrine and ketorolac 30 mg will be deposited by the orthopedic surgeon at the periarticular level under direct vision during surgery. Fascia, subcutaneous tissues, and skin will also be infiltrated with part of the solution before wound closure.
  • Procedure Posterior Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration plus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block
    From a total of forty-five milliliters of 0.25% bupivacaine + 5ug/mL epinephrine and ketorolac 30 mg, 15mL will be deposited by the orthopedic surgeon at the posterior periarticular level under direct vision during surgery. Fascia, subcutaneous tissues, and skin will also be infiltrated with part of the solution before wound closure with the remaining 30mL. After wound closure, an ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block will be performed by an anesthesiologist by injecting 10mL of 0.5%

Primary outcome measures

  • Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis) [Time frame: 3 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival]
Secondary outcome measures (12)
  • Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis) [Time frame: 6 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival]
  • Presence of quadriceps motor block (defined as paralysis or paresis) [Time frame: 24 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival]
  • Hip adduction strength [Time frame: 3 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival]
  • Hip adduction strength [Time frame: 6 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival]
  • Hip adduction strength [Time frame: 24 hours after post anesthesia care unit (PACU) arrival]
  • Postoperative morphine consumption [Time frame: 24 hours after PACU arrival]
  • Postoperative morphine consumption [Time frame: 48 hours after PACU arrival]
  • Time until first morphine demand [Time frame: 48 hours after PACU arrival]
  • Static and dynamic pain [Time frame: 3 hours after PACU arrival]
  • Static and dynamic pain [Time frame: 6 hours after PACU arrival]
  • Static and dynamic pain [Time frame: 12 hours after PACU arrival]
  • Static and dynamic pain [Time frame: 18 hours after PACU arrival]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
  • Body mass index between 20 and 35 (kg/m2)

Exclusion criteria

  • Adults who are unable to give their own consent
  • Pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
  • Coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work-up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
  • Renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work-up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
  • Hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work-up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
  • Allergy to local anesthetics (LAs) or morphine
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior surgery in the inguinal area corresponding surgical side
  • Chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

Chile · 1 center
  • Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile — Santiago

Publications

  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222. PMID 17403800
  • Wainwright TW, Gill M, McDonald DA, Middleton RG, Reed M, Sahota O, Yates P, Ljungqvist O. Consensus statement for perioperative care in total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):3-19. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1683790. Epub 2019 Oct 30. PMID 31663402
  • Giron-Arango L, Peng PWH, Chin KJ, Brull R, Perlas A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Nov;43(8):859-863. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000847. PMID 30063657
  • Kuchalik J, Magnuson A, Lundin A, Gupta A. Local infiltration analgesia or femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind study. Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 1. PMID 28850408
  • Bravo D, Aliste J, Layera S, Fernandez D, Erpel H, Aguilera G, Arancibia H, Barrientos C, Wulf R, Leon S, Branes J, Finlayson RJ, Tran Q. Randomized clinical trial comparing pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Oct;48(10):520-521. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104487. Epub 2023 Mar 22. No abstract avail PMID 36948525
  • Leurcharusmee P, Kantakam P, Intasuwan P, Malatong Y, Maikong N, Navic P, Kitcharanant N, Mahakkanukrauh P, Tran Q. Cadaveric study investigating the femoral nerve-sparing volume for pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Nov;48(11):549-552. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104419. Epub 2023 Apr 7. PMID 37028817

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06075004 · OAIC 1379/23

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗