Multisite Implementation of COMPRENDO

Official title

Multisite Implementation of COMPRENDO (ChildhOod Malignancy Peer REsearch NavigatiOn) to Improve Participation of Hispanic Children in Cancer Clinical Trials

Overview

COMPRENDO (ChildhOod Malignancy Peer Research NavigatiOn) is a multi-site randomized clinical trial (RCT) that uses a Hybrid Type 1 design, to test the effects of a clinical intervention on patient-level outcomes, while exploring multilevel implementation factors that can inform real-world setting implementation. This study will test the impact of COMPRENDO, a peer-navigation intervention, vs. usual care on accrual to childhood cancer therapeutic clinical trials and parental informed consent outcomes. COMPRENDO will be delivered by trained peer navigators in 4 visits. A mixed methods (surveys, individual interviews) implementation evaluation will examine implementation factors that can inform the use of peer navigation in clinical practice, integrating data from clinicians, navigators, administrators, and parents pre and post the RCT.

Detailed description

Aim 1:

Test the effectiveness of COMPRENDO vs. usual care to increase clinical trial accrual in a multisite RCT.

Aim 2:

Determine the impact of COMPRENDO vs. usual care on parental outcomes (informed consent, comprehension, voluntariness, decision-making self-efficacy, satisfaction with informed consent and decisional regret).

Aim 3:

Evaluate multisite implementation of COMPRENDO, focusing on acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity. We will use mixed methods with a minimum of 50 stakeholders: 22 clinicians, (17 oncologists, 3 psychologists, 2 social workers), 4 navigators, 4 administrators and 20 parents to identify implementation factors.

Within each site, eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention vs. usual care (informed consent discussion with the oncologist only), resulting in ≈200 participants randomized to each arm.

Interventions

• Other COMPRENDO Peer Navigation Intervention
  Parents randomized to the intervention, COMPRENDO, will receive culture, language, and health literacy-concordant pre-accrual, accrual, and post-accrual activities in person led by a peer navigator for up to 4 weeks. Visit 1 (V1) will provide anticipatory guidance and education on a) general concepts of pediatric cancer research (standard of care, clinical trials, randomization); b) informed consent/assent, research affiliations (e.g., Children's Oncology Group); c) clinical trial types (therape

Primary outcome measures

• Accrual [Time frame: 12 weeks]

Secondary outcome measures (6)

• Informed Consent Comprehension [Time frame: 12 weeks]
• Voluntariness [Time frame: 12 weeks]
• Decision-Making Self-Efficacy [Time frame: 12 weeks]
• Decisional Regret [Time frame: 12 weeks]
• Satisfaction with informed consent [Time frame: 12 weeks]
• Trust in Research [Time frame: 12 Weeks]

Eligibility criteria

Non-Stakeholder/Stakeholder Parent Eligibility criteria: A parent/legal guardian who has a Hispanic child aged 0 to 17y with a new diagnosis of cancer, has a child who is eligible for a therapeutic cancer clinical trial, will participate in an informed consent discussion for the therapeutic clinical trial, understands written and spoken English or Spanish, and has signed the consent form for the proposed COMPRENDO study. Participants will not be eligible if their child has second malignancy/relapse, was diagnosed at an outside institution, has potential transfer of care, was previously on a clinical trial

Stakeholder Clinician/Navigator/Administrator Clinicians, navigators and administrators who work at each site, are involved in treating pediatric patients and who are involved in the informed consent conference for clinical trials.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: Yes

Study design

Allocation

Randomized

Model

Parallel assignment

Masking

Open label

Primary purpose

Supportive care

Study locations

United States · 4 centers

• Children's of Alabama/University of Alabama at Birmingham — Birmingham
• Rady Children's Hospital San Diego/University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center — San Diego
• University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospitals — San Francisco
• Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Boston Children's Hospital — Boston

Publications

• Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. PMID 22310560
• Palinkas LA, Mendon SJ, Hamilton AB. Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:423-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215. Epub 2019 Jan 11. PMID 30633710
• Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Rabin B, Aarons GA. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 5;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6. PMID 30611302
• Freeman HP. Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities. J Urban Health. 2006 Mar;83(2):139-41. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9030-0. No abstract available. PMID 16736361

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06055296 · 808092 · 1R01CA279945-01

Primary sources (government registries)

• ClinicalTrials.gov (US NIH)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗