Menu
Recruiting NCT06037694

Effectiveness of Meshed Free Gingival Graft for Widening of Keratinized Tissues

No phase Interventional Gingiva Atrophy

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Conventional Free Gingival Graft, 'Mesh Free Gingival Graft.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Gingiva Atrophy. Basic parameters: 18 years — 70 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United Arab Emirates
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

Widening of Keratinized Tissues With an Expanded Meshed Free Gingival Graft: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Overview

The overall objective of this project is to evaluate, over a period of 1 year, the outcomes of either conventional free gingival graft (FGG) or mesh-FGG to increase the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) at implant sites.

Detailed description

The importance of the width of keratinized mucosa (KM) at implant sites remains a subject of ongoing debate. Reduced dimensions of KM (width \<2 mm) are associated with mucosal recession, biofilm accumulation, soft-tissue inflammation, marginal bone loss, peri-implantitis and patient discomfort. Surgical options to increase the width of KM include an apically positioned flap, either alone or in combination with an autogenous graft or a xenogeneic collagen matrix. The free gingival graft (FGG) is a well-established technique with a history of successful clinical use. The harvesting procedure for autogenous graft from the palatal mucosa, however, is usually associated with significant patient morbidity, especially when there is a need to graft extensive mucosal areas. To overcome this problem, various graft modifications have been proposed to limit the need for large-area autografts. Examples include the accordion technique, the strip gingival autograft technique, and a vertical modification of the strip gingival graft. The expanded mesh graft, another graft modification, has been used in the field of plastic surgery, especially in the treatment of large burn wounds. Recently, De Greef, Carcuac, De Mars et al. proposed this technique to be used in periodontal plastic surgery, more specifically, in the widening of KM at implant sites by means of a meshed free gingival graft (mesh-FGG). In this case series, initially inadequate width of KM in edentulous areas could be successfully increased prior to implant installation, without the need for any extensive autograft harvesting. Data from trials comparing mesh-FGG to conventional FGG and assessing the long-term efficacy of this novel technique, however, are missing.

The investigators hypothesize that the mesh-FGG technique will demonstrate similar clinical results (non-inferiority: increase in KM width) but improved patient-reported outcomes (superiority: post-surgical morbidity) compared to the FGG.

Interventions

  • Procedure Conventional Free Gingival Graft
    Implant site with insufficient dimensions of KM will be covered by a conventional free gingival graft.
  • Procedure 'Mesh Free Gingival Graft
    Implant site with insufficient dimensions of KM will be covered by a expanded meshed free gingival graft.

Primary outcome measures

  • Changes of Keratinized Mucosa width (KMW) [Time frame: up to 1 year]
Secondary outcome measures (3)
  • Changes of Keratinized Mucosa Thickness (KMT) [Time frame: up to 1 year]
  • Patient Morbidity [Time frame: up to 2 weeks]
  • Patient Satisfaction [Time frame: up to 1 year]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age,
  • systemically healthy,
  • presence of ≥2 adjacent implants in both sides of the mandibles showing <2 mm of KM on the buccal aspects,
  • subjects have to present with discomfort from brushing and/or difficulties in maintaining proper home care due to inadequate dimension of KM
  • Full-Mouth Plaque Score (FMPS) <20%,
  • Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS) <20%.

Exclusion criteria

  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • tobacco smoking,
  • uncontrolled medical condition,
  • medication that can affect gingival conditions.

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple blind
Primary purpose
Treatment

Study locations

United Arab Emirates · 1 center
  • ConfiDent ® Dental Surgery Clinic, Dubai Palm Jumeirah — Dubai

Publications

  • Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, Wang HL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S246-S266. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12954. PMID 29926484
  • Sanz M, Schwarz F, Herrera D, McClain P, Figuero E, Molina A, Monje A, Montero E, Pascual A, Ramanauskaite A, Renouard F, Sader R, Schiegnitz E, Urban I, Heitz-Mayfield L. Importance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: Consensus report of group 1 of the DGI/SEPA/Osteology Workshop. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23:47-55. doi: 10.1111/clr.13956. PMID 35763021
  • Lim HC, An SC, Lee DW. A retrospective comparison of three modalities for vestibuloplasty in the posterior mandible: apically positioned flap only vs. free gingival graft vs. collagen matrix. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jun;22(5):2121-2128. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2320-y. Epub 2017 Dec 23. PMID 29275490
  • Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2021 Jan;92(1):21-44. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0716. Epub 2020 Aug 9. PMID 32710810
  • Singh M, Nuutila K, Collins KC, Huang A. Evolution of skin grafting for treatment of burns: Reverdin pinch grafting to Tanner mesh grafting and beyond. Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1149-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 30. PMID 28153583
  • De Greef A, Carcuac O, De Mars G, Stankov V, Cortasse B, Giordani G, Van Dooren E. The expanded mesh free gingival graft: A novel approach to increase the width of keratinized mucosa. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024 Sep;14(3):157-164. doi: 10.1002/cap.10264. Epub 2023 Aug 16. PMID 37551510
  • Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, Sanz-Sanchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32-49. doi: 10.1111/clr.13114. PMID 29498129

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06037694 · OCarcuac-meshFGG

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗