Menu
Recruiting NCT06034080

Interventions to De-implement Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescribing for Children With Ear Infections

No phase Interventional Acute Otitis Media Ear Infection Pediatric Infectious Disease

For patients and families

In plain language

An automatic summary of structured registry data. It is an orientation aid, not a substitute for the official protocol or a physician assessment.

What is being studied
The protocol lists: Changes to the electronic health record (EHR), Individualized audit and feedback reporting for clinicians, Clinician education sessions, Use of a shared decision-making (SDM) aide.
Who it may be relevant to
Registry conditions: Acute Otitis Media, Ear Infection, Pediatric Infectious Disease. Basic parameters: 6 months — 17 years · All.
What needs checking
Age, condition and sex are only basic indicators. Prior treatment, laboratory values and other mandatory requirements appear in the eligibility criteria below.
Where it takes place
United States
Next step
Save the trial, show it to the treating physician, and confirm current recruitment with the study center. Costs, documents and travel →
Official title

DISAPEAR Trial: Interventions to De-implement Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescribing for Children With Ear Infections

Overview

This study aims to improve care and reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for children with ear infections. The study will compare the effectiveness of a "gold standard" to a hybrid intervention combined with this gold standard, in order to identify steps to increase parent satisfaction for child ear infection care. The "gold standard" approach is a Health System Level Intervention. On its own, it involves clinician education, tools in electronic medical records, and audit and feedback reports for clinician prescribing habits. The hybrid intervention includes the elements of the health systems level intervention in addition to a Shared Decision-Making component, which allows for both an increase in the role parents play in their child's care, as well as clinician education for how to use this method. The goals of this work are to increase parent satisfaction, reduce antibiotics taken for childhood ear infections, align medical care with the current national guidelines, and evaluate differences in the two intervention groups. Both groups will be evaluated for implementation outcomes to improve dissemination and scalability for future use of these models in antibiotic prescribing for children with ear infections. This study will recruit a diverse group of patients and clinicians to complete surveys, parents to participate in focus groups, and clinicians and administrators to be interviewed in order to meet study aims and receive sufficient feedback on the interventions performed. There are two hypotheses for this research: 1. The Hybrid Intervention will have higher parent satisfaction and reduced antibiotic use compared to the Health-System Level Intervention and 2. The Hybrid Intervention will be more challenging to implement than the Health-System Level Intervention, but will be preferred by parents, clinicians, and administrators.

Detailed description

Acute otitis media (AOM), commonly referred to as an ear infection, is the most common reason children are prescribed antibiotics, affecting 5 million children and resulting in 10 million antibiotic prescriptions annually. By 3 years of age over 60% of children will have had AOM. Though 84% of AOM episodes resolve without antibiotics, antibiotics are prescribed to \>95% of children. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that most children with AOM do not receive an immediate antibiotic (an antibiotic to take right away) and instead be managed with watchful waiting, where an antibiotic is used only if the child worsens or does not improve. In clinical trials watchful waiting reduced antibiotic use by over 62% and did not result in increased complications, reduced parent satisfaction, or increased symptoms. Unfortunately, despite these trials \<5% of children with AOM are managed with watchful waiting. The use of antibiotics when not needed contributes to the development of antibiotic resistant organisms, which makes future infections more difficult to treat. Additionally, unnecessary antibiotics reduce pediatric quality of life and over 26% of children who take an antibiotic experience an adverse drug event (ADE). Thus, for every 100 children with AOM who take an antibiotic at least 26 children experience harm; whereas only 5 children have symptomatic benefit.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two pragmatic interventions to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce unnecessary antibiotics taken for AOM. Interventions will be conducted at 33 community-based clinics and/or urgent care centers across three distinct geographic regions in the United States. Randomization will occur at the clinic center level to either the gold standard approach or the hybrid intervention. The Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) will be used to guide implementation and the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework will be used to evaluate outcomes. A mixed-methods approach will be used in the pre-implementation and evaluation phases and will utilize quantitative analyses, semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and surveys.

Interventions

  • Other Changes to the electronic health record (EHR)
    EHR changes will include minor changes to prescription fields to make it easier for clinicians to order "wait and see" antibiotics to be filled only if the child worsens or does not improve rather than antibiotics to take immediately.
  • Other Individualized audit and feedback reporting for clinicians
    Automated audit and feedback reports detailing participating clinicians' antibiotic prescribing habits for AOM both individually and in comparison to their peers will be shared with clinicians on a quarterly basis throughout the intervention period.
  • Other Clinician education sessions
    Virtual education sessions will be held for clinicians to learn more about national guidelines for antibiotic prescribing for AOM, etc. The sessions will be recorded and distributed to clinicians who were unable to attend. Attendance of these sessions will apply toward continuing medical education credits for participants.
  • Other Use of a shared decision-making (SDM) aide
    A previously validated SDM aide for AOM will be used by clinicians during visits with children with AOM. The aide will be available online and in paper form.
  • Other Shared decision-making (SDM) education
    Clinicians will receive education on SDM and how to use the aid via virtual, recorded sessions.

Primary outcome measures

  • Increase in Parent Satisfaction [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
  • Percentage of Patients Taking an Antibiotic for AOM [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
Secondary outcome measures (8)
  • Shared Decision-Making [Time frame: At time of clinic visit for ear infection (0 Days)]
  • Pediatric Quality of Life [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
  • Symptom and Severity Duration [Time frame: 0 and 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
  • Missed Work/School/Daycare [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
  • Adverse Drug Events [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
  • Treatment Failure [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]
  • Management Strategy [Time frame: At time of clinic visit for ear infection (0 Days)]
  • Antibiotic Prescription Filled [Time frame: 10 days after clinic visit for ear infection]

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

A. Implementation of Interventions 1. Clinic at a participating organization 2. Provides care to children with AOM 3. Administrative or local approval for participation

B. Secondary Electronic Health Record Data

  • Aged 6 months-17-years-old (inclusive)
  • Diagnosis of AOM by ICD10 code

C. Video recordings or direct observation of the use of a shared decision aid

Parent participation:

  • Child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive)
  • Diagnosed with AOM by clinician
  • Parent or legal guardian is present and is >=18 years or older

Clinician Participation:

  • Licensed clinician and not a medical trainee
  • Age 18 >= years or older

D. Pre-implementation interviews of clinicians and administrators

  • Licensed clinician (physician or advanced practice clinician) that cares for children with AOM at a participating organization or an administrator/manager at a participating organization.
  • Aged >=18 years-no maximum

E. Pre-implementation focus groups of parents

  • Parent or legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive) that has had AOM diagnosed at a participating organization.
  • 18 years of age or older and able/willing to consent

F. Parents enrolled for surveys

1\. Parent or legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive) that has had AOM diagnosed at a participating organization. 2. Willing to participate and able to complete electronic surveys at enrollment and 10 days after enrollment. 3. Working phone 4. Age >=18 years of age

G. Post-intervention focus groups of parents

  • Parent or legal guardian of a child aged 6 months-17 years (inclusive) that has had AOM diagnosed at a participating organization.
  • 18 years of age or older and able/willing to consent

H. Post-intervention surveys of clinicians and administrators

  • Licensed clinician (physician or advanced practice clinician) that cares for children with AOM at a participating organization or an administrator/manager at a participating organization.
  • Aged >=18 years-no maximum

Exclusion criteria

A. Implementation of Interventions

1\. Clinics that exclusively provide telehealth

B. Secondary Electronic Health Record Data

1\. None

C. Video recordings or direct observation of the use of a shared decision aid

Parent participation:

1\. None

Clinician Participation:

1\. None

D. Pre-implementation interviews of clinicians and administrators 1. Medical trainee (student, resident, fellow, etc.)

E. Pre-implementation focus groups of parents

1\. None

F. Parents enrolled for surveys 1. Complicated or recurrent AOM as determined by the study team

G. Post-intervention focus groups of parents 1. None

H. Post-intervention surveys of clinicians and administrators

1\. Medical trainee (student, resident, fellow, etc.)

Criteria are shown verbatim from the registry (in English). Final eligibility is always assessed by the study center.

Healthy volunteers: No

Study design

Allocation
Randomized
Model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Open label
Primary purpose
Health services research

Study locations

United States · 3 centers
  • Denver Health and Hospital Authority — Denver
  • AllianceChicago — Chicago
  • Intermountain Health — Murray

Publications

  • Rinehart DJ, Gilbert A, Andersen LM, Gray TW, O'Leary S, Frost HM; DISAPEAR Study Group. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Watchful Waiting for Pediatric Acute Otitis Media. J Pediatr. 2026 Feb;289:114904. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114904. Epub 2025 Nov 13. PMID 41241139
  • Jenkins TC, Keith A, Stein AB, Hersh AL, Narayan R, Eggleston A, Rinehart DJ, Patel PK, Walter E, Hargraves IG, Frost HM; DISAPEAR Study Group. Interventions to de-implement unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for ear infections (DISAPEAR Trial): protocol for a cluster-randomized trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08960-z. PMID 38267837

Identifiers

NCT: NCT06034080 · 23-1096 · IHS-2022C2-28005

Primary sources (government registries)

View this study on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗